Frage von Bockhorst:
Hello,
I have some questions about the above programs ... would be nice if I could help someone ...
I want to buy me one of the two, and thus largely Avi Files
later converted to MPEG2 for DVD authoring
Question 1:
Can you run the multiplex TMPEnc 2.5, the files "on-the-fly without running after this step umständlicherweise or manual compression of the MPEG Tools ... If Yes, How?
In the version of TMPGEnc 3.0 Xpress, this does seem to go to ...
Question 2:
In both programs, it seems indeed to be a way to batch-encoding run ... in which the input of the jobs work faster?
Question 3:
I had prepared myself (in TMPGEnc 2.5 Pros) a profile (*. mcf file) in which I have saved the settings for the Koprimierung but when I upload a new file I have to re Reload this profile ... the somewhat annoying ... you can save it as the Defalut ... If so, how?
Question 4:
I have encoded with the trial version of TMPGEnc 2.5 some files ... I may use them as commercial? Can it be any basis of the finished Mpg's trace with which program (trial or trial) that were created? ... want to stop after the purchase did not need to re-encode everything ....
Question 5: it is worth you think are the $ 11 more for the Xpress version 3.0 if I really want to convert AVI's mainly a lot in MPEG2 but otherwise no Knick Knacks need?
Thank you in advance!
MfG
Bockhorst
Antwort von Bockhorst:
Wanted bescheidgeben only time this has done is question 1 ... Although I found no way with the TMPGEnc 2.5 but with the command line tool
"mplex1" goes the script beautifully with a one-line command line.
Would be nice if someone else had an idea to the questions 2-5 ... answering every single question would help me have something!
Thank you!
Bockhorst
Antwort von MiXMaster:
Unfortunately, I realized that only in the WinDVD with mplex1 files muxed properly run ... when I play in Media Player, they jump like crazy and are completed in a short time ... If I have the same Files
With TMPGEnc 2.5 muxe not happen
Question 1 is therefore still interesting again!
Because of the problem mplex1 nen I'm going to open new thread because this thread has actually nothing to do with it.
