Frage von Heike:
Hello, I would like to buy a new television - and have no idea.
I'm thinking particularly the DVB-S. If I have understood correctly, is about the satellite. Since I live rurally, we have no cable but a satellite dish. The receiver is at least 8 years old and is connected with a scart cable. Is this analogy, or what?
In what I now have to look for when purchase, so I get a viable television, DVB-T, DVB-C or DVB-S?
Must have the television (in my case) DVB-S? Furthermore, I would be interested if I replace the receiver in order to get the new television to work, or I can synonymous the scart cable in these HDMI connector affixed.
When I read that, I realize that I really have no idea. I hope you understand what I mean. Thank schonmal.
Antwort von deti:
Guckst du mal hier: http://forum.digitalfernsehen.de/forum/
Deti
Antwort von frm:
Generally you ought to pay attention to not only do not you buy a new digital receiver because the receiver may be synonymous s.der dish (LNB) must be digital. If it is 8 years old as the receiver then it need not necessarily be digital.
In explanation of DVB (Digital Video Broadcast) T = terrestrial, S = satellite, C = cable.
Ichhabe is not a new plasma as synonymous LCD Television with a built-in receiver for satellite views, and this may well be the case.
For Television:
I am a big fan of Panasonic Plasma devices in Full HD Resolution. But that must each decide for themselves.
http://www.panasonic.de/html/de_DE/Produkte/Flachbildfernseher/Plasma+Technologie/27855/index.html#anker_27855
A suitable receiver you gotta buy this yet. It is to be considered synonymous to you whether you are buying an HDTV capable receiver as well but still rather expensive and currently the station selection is very small.
I hope I'll able to help einwenig.
Good luck
Florian
Antwort von deti:
I am a big fan of Panasonic Plasma devices in Full HD Resolution. But that must each decide for themselves. I am a big fan of Samsung LCD models in full HD. That must really decide for themselves. But the forum here is certainly not the right one for your inquiry.
Deti
Antwort von nicecam:
When I read that, I realize that I really have no idea. Funny :-) formulated
Some of your questions are already answered here so competently. Much more I can not tell you about this synonymous.
Let us remark that
... if you you buy an HDTV capable receiver as well with still more expensive and currently the new channel selection is very small. Since then have behind the DVB-S or a "2" are - ie DVB-S2.
Antwort von Heike:
Thank you, that you have replied to me so promptly.
I do not feel Thy presence a television buy that has a built-in receiver - maybe I expressed myself wrong. My concern is simply a question on what I must respect. The old receiver goes, but it fits this device s.den new Television? When in advertising DVB-T, DVB-C stands, then I mean it has no way connect him s.einen satellites as the receiver this is missing, eg. SonyKDL-40Z4500 (not specified here over DVB-S) or am I thinking too complicated.
The dish is much older, and whatnot that LNB? is not guaranteed digitally, so that would mean the LNB to be replaced or the whole dish, or one must also first in the future?
Greeting Heike
Antwort von frm:
to my knowledge next year analog television will be switched off via satellite, so you need defentiv soon switch to digital. The mirror need not be changed, it is imperative that he is too small. He should be at least 75cm in size!
Hg
Florian
Antwort von deti:
to my knowledge next year analog television will be switched off via satellite, so you need defentiv soon switch to digital. The mirror need not be changed, it is imperative that he is too small. He should be at least 75cm in size! Analogue of the public transportation system will be sent until 30.04.2012: http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/ARD-and-ZDF-legen-sich-auf-Datum-fuer-Abschaltung-des-Analog-TV-fest-Update-828098.html
A 60cm antenna is enough: http://www.astra.de/Empfang/footprints/index.php
The LNB has to support only two tapes. If in doubt, a new antenna with LNB costs about 30 ¬.
http://www.pollin.de/shop/dt/ODUxOTI0OTk-/Antennentechnik/SAT_Technik/LNBs/Universal_Quad_LNB.html
http://www.pollin.de/shop/t/NDU5OTA5OTk-/Antennentechnik/SAT_Technik/Spiegel/Satelliten_Offsetantennen.html
As a receiver I would take sowas eg http://www.pollin.de/shop/dt/NzA5ODI0OTk-/Antennentechnik/SAT_Technik/Receiver/DVB_S_HDTV_Receiver_SL100HD_PVRready.html
As sowas TV: http://www.guenstiger.de/gt/main.asp?produkt=966987
Power together approximately 700 ¬ - Any questions?
Deti
Antwort von Heike:
Hey, you are but what kind of service and fast!
1. The Pana. TXP50GW10 or TXP42V10E would suit me. Here are synonymous, I think the evidence over DVB-S, unfortunately, nothing about viewing angle and power, I would have been important.
2. Deti So, I'm speechless. Quick response and very ausführlich.Vielen thanks. The television, I looked at synonymous. But again, no DVB-S, I notice (I think your statements did not understand or you would not to me) recommend. But I've read that I need a plasma, because of the high viewing angle.
Antwort von deti:
Forget plasma - almost all Manufacturers have withdrawn from the market. The theme is by - synonymous when there is still a few enthusiasts. Plasma displays are expensive to buy, need much current, usually have no full-HD Resolutionund a very low color depth. The viewing angle of LCDs is the current plasma after barely. There are also a wider color range, and a significantly lower power consumption.
You purchase an external set-top box. Television with built-in satellite receivers are getting rare, and especially not offer the capabilities of external devices. example to me of the recommended set-top box the ability to record to hard drive.
Deti
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
And internal Receiver does not get replaced as soon as the next big thing anrollt can start with the contemporary Receiver nothing ... Ich finds synonymous annoying to have such a thing extra in the closet, but there are worse!
Antwort von Bespi:
Forget plasma - almost all Manufacturers have withdrawn from the market. The theme is by - synonymous when there is still a few enthusiasts. Plasma displays are expensive to buy, need much current, usually have no full-HD Resolutionund a very low color depth. The viewing angle of LCDs is the current plasma after barely. There are also a wider color range, and a significantly lower power consumption.
Deti Each PDP has Full HD. And the power consumption was reduced significantly when the new Panasonic synonymous. In addition, a plasma is cheaper to purchase than an LCD.
This one has already built an HD satellite tuner (without hard drive) http://www.panasonic.de/html/de_DE/Produkte/TV-Ger%C3%A4te/Viera+Plasma+TV/TX-P42GW10/%C3%9Cbersicht/2203957/index.html
Antwort von deti:
So an average consumption of 200W, and 350W maximum even then built-in fans, the roar heard. I'm not convinced. The device costs 1100 ¬ - cheap is not synonymous in this class.
Deti
Antwort von Bespi:
So an average consumption of 200W, and 350W maximum even then built-in fans, the roar heard. I'm not convinced. The device costs 1100 ¬ - cheap is not synonymous in this class.
Deti In return you get so synonymous a contrast of 2 million to 1, a reaction time of 0.001 MS and 600Hz Intelligent Frame Creation and all of a recognized brand company and not of Samsung and LG. Which LCD television is sowas offer for this price? None!
In an approved test of this device, incidentally got the best mark in terms of picture.
