Newsmeldung von slashCAM:The Lord of the Rings - The Return of the King Sunday 20:15 8. April 2007 / RTL Epic Fantasy Action in the goggle-box: The third part of the Rings trilogy with waits of three to s.Spezialeffekten quantity (in comparison to part one) and is the third film in history, with the eleven "Oscars" was (the others are " Ben Hur "and" Titanic ").
The final battle for Middle-earth is a breathtaking consuming and what eye candy for the heart, there's the bargain. Big words are curved like the naked swords, but thousands of Orcs, Trolls, Nazgul, Warg, Olifants and a whole army of dead will be thrown into the Waagshale to the fate of mankind to decide. Meanwhile, the great hope of Ring-bearer Frodo and Sam during their crucial mission to the aid of a schizophrenic jewelry fetishists instructed. It is true that the fine s.and an extensive film, loving post-production has enjoyed, you can see him easily. (The Lord Of The Rings - The Return Of The King, USA / New Zealand 2003)
/ JPR
Antwort von Max.3:
in the film is what struck me: it was in 16:9, although on my DVD cinemascope to see ...
why did the film in the reingezoomt ...?
mfg
Antwort von Max.3:
in the film is what struck me: it was in 16:9, although on my DVD cinemascope to see ...
why did the film in the reingezoomt ...?
mfg stimmt! I noticed synonymous!
Antwort von Axel:
RTL makes it almost always, the other individuals usually synonymous. Mir, it is unclear why someone is doing an about 3 hours long movie with all these commercial breaks to see. Perhaps the people have the feeling that the film is "live".
Antwort von Valentino:
RTL makes it almost always, the other individuals usually synonymous. Mir, it is unclear why someone is doing an about 3 hours long movie with all these commercial breaks to see. Perhaps the people have the feeling that the film is "live". Since I can only agree with Axel synonymous, I think it is a synonymous impertinence a Cinemascope film to bring to 16:9, while in the U.S. even a 4:3 full version of lord of the rings there.
What I do not synonymous quite understand it for such films of the owners or creators but certain requirements must be right?
So far the times I have read the cameraman, has a directors verglagt a private broadcaster, since this advertising without his consent in his film is displayed.
As far as I know the judges have it right, because the transmitter is the "art" film verlezt and had been synonymous in the contract, the group of commercials during the movie was not mentioned.
Somehow it fits me so synonymous, as if the film is again another Colorgrading of RTL missed one. For RTL something I can even imagine the sort to be in a position.
On yesterday I was somehow like a "cheap" fantasy series knitted and not like the version on DVD or in the movies, but you can switch the television or aussschalten ;-)
