Frage von De_Majus:
Dear forum members,
I bekommne an inquiry from a famous sports club to shoot a film about its history. The content is mainly (80%) of recordings from the years 1920-1933 (synonymous photos) and above all of 1960-present. In particular, the material from the post-war years, dozens of times already run on television, on all possible channels.
For me, the question arises, as I was coming s.solche photographs of what it costs and get some historical footage and especially how it looks with the use rights.
I am 'use of other material "in the field again, so really have no idea how to behave there, I s.wen contact me there must note what I need, etc.
Does anyone have an idea?
I look forward to your contributions!
Best regards,
DM
Antwort von Numquam:
It depends s.Wer the author of the material. This is where the limits of copyright law.
This means the Rechtte of the author are subject to temporal and substantive limitations. The limits of copyright and neighboring rights are the expression of meaning and purpose of the de copyright.
This applies, inter alia, the time limit:
The protection of the rights of the copyright expires 70 years after the death of the author. After that works in the public domain. All exploitation rights and legal positions of moral rights expire. In the time to death and then 70 years later the heirs of the author.
Does that mean in your case, you should first verify the origin of any material. If this was 71 years dead, you can use the material at will.
1960 until today more difficult! As will probably live all copyrights to happiness. ;-)
The material of 1920 and it will also be difficult.
Whether the material has already been shown in TV programs is irrelevant, since they usually have distribution rights and rights of use and for the material on the basis of a written permission to have this agreement has.
Greetz
Antwort von Pianist:
Whether the material has already been shown in TV programs is irrelevant, since they usually have distribution rights and rights of use and for the material on the basis of a written permission to have this agreement has. But that's an advantage because he can ask there and receive precise information, of whom is the material. This simplifies the process. If this is a sports club and he negotiated well, it seems quite possible to get such material at affordable prices. But it is important to use only material in which the legal situation is clear. Or if an archive says: "This is from the 20's, unclear legal situation, which we have already given out 100 times and has never complained to anyone," then I would use synonymous.
Matthias
Antwort von Numquam:
Whether the material has already been shown in TV programs is irrelevant, since they usually have distribution rights and rights of use and for the material on the basis of a written permission to have this agreement has.
But that's an advantage because he can ask there and receive precise information, of whom is the material. This simplifies the process. If this is a sports club and he negotiated well, it seems quite possible to get such material at affordable prices. But it is important to use only material in which the legal situation is clear. Or if an archive says: "This is from the 20's, unclear legal situation, which we have already given out 100 times and has never complained to anyone," then I would use synonymous.
Matthias Yes certainly clear this is a start to search, I have not criticized synonymous ;-) But WATCH OUT!
Well, a sports club, I think, not be as liquid material to be able to buy from the 20's that can easily cost several times synonymous thousand euros. Whether it's photos, or the like.
The law is always first of all clear by the end, the theory of transfer. You can always clarify what is phase. If the author has been dead 71 years, the law is also clear.
Antwort von De_Majus:
Hi,
many thanks for the quick replies, yes it went really fast!
Current status:
I just phoned with a (public service) transmitter. s.Telefon The Lord told me that they could hand over the recordings in principle. I call in my request a mail shots to me synonymous able to provide concrete information. I asked about the copyright, then I can be called synonymous focal points (though I've decided for recordings), I can contact s.die me. So far seems a lot easier than I thought.
I would still like to know with what I reckon there must be: How much does all the fun? I need material for about 10 minutes to fill. Does anyone schonmal made such an action and can tell me how long does something like this (dubbing, possibly encoding etc.). containing it time and Money, which I must include in the calculation ...
Greetings!
Antwort von Numquam:
Hi,
many thanks for the quick replies, yes it went really fast!
Current status:
I just phoned with a (public service) transmitter. s.Telefon The Lord told me that they could hand over the recordings in principle. I call in my request a mail shots to me synonymous able to provide concrete information. I asked about the copyright, then I can be called synonymous focal points (though I've decided for recordings), I can contact s.die me. So far seems a lot easier than I thought.
I would still like to know with what I reckon there must be: How much does all the fun? I need material for about 10 minutes to fill. Does anyone schonmal made such an action and can tell me how long does something like this (dubbing, possibly encoding etc.). containing it time and Money, which I must include in the calculation ...
Greetings! This can tell no one! The DU must make clear to the people with the rights of exploitation s.den plants possess these synonymous give you information on the Height of the cost.
YOU may have a contract signed with the author.
The fact that this is "only" a Zehnminüter has absolutely nothing to do with the Height of the cost of the material.
It is ansich on the material. Did anything else you never done before? I assume that this is not the case.
It depends s.wie fast you work, say how many hours you need. Moreover, this material is what do YOU have been digitized, as it already as you say umpteen times on TV to see was.
Then YOU need it only in the right format for you convert. And since it comes back to the complexity of the material.
In general, calculations are always with buffers versehen.Puffer items that are variable.
Get your information first of the transmitters and then make your calculation.
Underestimate but not the 10 minutes. Sounds little of, but can take a very long time. ;-)
It seems easier for you right now, it seems ....... ;-)
Quite so simple is not.
Greetz
[/ B]
Antwort von De_Majus:
Hi,
10 minutes did not in the little, it shows again and again, with every production =)
This is my first with such complexity, I was that involved more of the "rotary cutting SpezialFX-Finish productions, as I was before that clearly state what is and what does not.
I will be your suggestion to heart and the variable included in the calculation, just as you have recommended.
I am still waiting for response from the station, I'm curious what comes.
At this point I would like to thank you for having found my blue-eyed questions =)
Antwort von Numquam:
They were not naive ;-) Man can and must above all do not know anything and everything can not synonymous.
On that note: Good luck!
Greetz
Antwort von Pianist:
I would still like to know with what I reckon there must be: How much does all the fun? I need material for about 10 minutes to fill. At best, it manages you, get the required 10 minutes for free legally, if they support the rights holders do your Project. May come together some 100 EUR for technical costs. If it is, but to material of a commercially operated Archives, then you can go about of 500 to 1,000 EUR per minute, which is synonymous to the extent of the proposed use. It may be true that they cost ten minutes 5000-10000 EUR. Why ten minutes? How long will the film be? Usually you do something short and yet crisp ...
You know the exact cost but really only when you have all the offers of the copyright holders. It may be the way, that prepayment is required, so you should be able to pre-something.
Matthias
