Frage von koji:
I'm looking for still such a camera lens immerdrauf synonymous but I would like to use for video. the tamron 17-270 / 3.5-6.3 course has a magnificent focal length coverage, but is good for the video at all? Of course, would be a tamron or sigma 70-200 with 2.8 better but such a 17-270 has been synonymous benefits (synonymous IS).
Unfortunately, this did nothing found on vimeo. synonymous little on youtube
Antwort von B.DeKid:
So I perso. dislike sollche Multi Zoom Lenses.
In Aperture, it cries out for extra lighting to make Good quality recordings.
A couple of guys I have so synonymous zoom (the Sigma makes good impression in the class nen)
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... the tamron 17-270 / 3.5-6.3 course has a magnificent focal length coverage, but is good for the video anyway? ... For video capability, I can not say anything, but what I've seen s.Testfotos was not so great that you want to buy it immediately. That should s.Tamron less than s.den physical laws are, because with such a massive focal range - actually the way s.18mm - now have great times compromises are made.
Although this Zoom has cut off some tests more thoroughly than we had feared, I would do it not to me only because of the low light intensity. And since it is not synonymous use s.Vollformatkameras to be installed in a possible subsequent rise of APS-C (which is) but more in-Stillimage than in the video area of concern.
Antwort von Jan:
Very dangerous Lens!
Set a F 6.3 lens, he simply views s.eine Nikon (D 90 or 5000 I had) in the test. In Live View mode, the camera is at the telephoto end specifically to focus almost never, or ever need much time. Who may live image, which has with these f 6.3 optics, he had time problems. Viewfinder friends will interfere less.
If the video is not so important though gibts (ja eh no autofocus with Nikon (if you have a Canon 500 D in the eye - they have even a "One Push Auto Focus during the video - I would test this on another jedenfall - whether with Canon F 6.3 lenses he will cope with it better than Nikon).
18-200 and 18-250 or 18-270 buy DSLR newcomers, Wechselfaule or Geringqualitätsansprüchler.
It now has nothing to do with Tamron, but goes next to the Canon 18-200, Sigma Mega 18er zooms or synonymous with the old Nikon 18-200. The new Nikon 18-200 II s.einer I still have not had a camera, but I can not imagine that Nikon has circumvented the basic physical laws.
Who has time then tested other optics s.seiner Camera, will see what (a better contrast, better resolution, especially in representing WW) can.
Ok, the optical advantages are especially important for the photo operation for video could be neglected.
I'm still not a fan of such optics.
VG
January
