Frage von Halim Sahin:
Hello,
I'm almost at the end!
Hopefully, the Council!
A dvb-c 2300 under linux with the latest drivers has a bad
receiving qualified in comparison to 2100er dvb-c.
Comical way in the net I found nothing about my inquiry and synonymous
on the linux-dvb list so far remained unanswered.
Because someone knows the problem or has a proposal for me, what I
could still try?
System: 2.6.13er suse kernel with the latest hg snapshot of the dvb drivers.
vdr-1.3.43.
Thank you for your help in advance.
Antwort von Christian Guhl:
Halim Sahin wrote:
> A 2300 dvb-c under linux with the latest drivers has a bad
> Receiving qualified in comparison to 2100er dvb-c.
How do you achieve this result? Do you have a worse objectively Picture
with the 2300er or refer you only to the quality of the display
Femon plugins? What does femon or femon plugin for VDR exactly?
Do you have there values> 0 in the BER?
@ vdr-portal there's times, attempting to budget for your cards
Reception quality to sort. That is failed, that any
Map data for the reception quality at its Gusto outputs (the
a%, the other in x of 255, etc.).
It seems only the values of femon supplied for BER for a
Comparison basis.
Regards
Christian
--
Every feature is a bug unless it can be turned off
Antwort von Halim Sahin:
Hi Christian,
The map shows czap if you have a bad signal and there is
suspensions in picture and sound (gluksende noises).
The comparison comes to a position:
Same time a cable box with dbc 2100 and thereafter on the same cable
umgesteckt the other box.
the 2300erhat dropouts without question.
Perhaps a ideeGruß
Halim
