Newsmeldung von slashCAM:Test: Test: Canon EOS 60D vs Panasonic GH2 vs Nikon D7000 Lowlightvergleich of rob - January 14, 2011 14:28:00 > We have here the night scenes, which we have produced with the Panasonic GH2, the Canon EOS 60D and the Nikon D7000, compiled for a lowlight Comparison and thus brings together the current three most interesting video DSLRs in direct lowlight Comparison.
full article
Antwort von pilskopf:
Tests quiet times the Nokton F0.95
Is really worth the time to test extensively. Even in direct Comparison with the 20mm pancake.
Antwort von handiro:
So you can guess from the commentary that are the respective lower parts of the frames to GH2? would be good to mention that in the article ...
Antwort von rob:
Hello Handiro,
just as it is - it got added in the article.
Regards
Rob
Antwort von handiro:
Thanks Rob.
The GH13 is as sharp ;-) Therefore: good test!
Antwort von ChristianG:
may be so great that GH2, so useful to me seems a test in which one uses the same optics. It is people looking into rates into the blue ... could be better, perhaps it is, presumably, you do not know really.
Antwort von cutty:
However, it is unlikely that both the Canon and the Nikon Optics synonymous Sun drown? As even more the camera will be the cause. Perhaps you have forgotten to focus because you? ;-)
Antwort von Filmo:
may be so great that GH2, so useful to me seems a test in which one uses the same optics. It is people looking into rates into the blue ... could be better, perhaps it is, presumably, you do not know really. Klaro, slashCAM should finally buy ne Optics, adjusts the cameras would s.alle, but laughed that then perhaps not Canon or Nikon in the lead, has not it? :-)))
Is apparently difficult to accept, such a result .....
Antwort von pilskopf:
You'll get even with 2000 ¬ lenses in the Canon no aliasing free Iso Chart to face. No matter what lens you used because the problem is the cause not the effect.
Antwort von ChristianG:
may be so great that GH2, so useful to me seems a test in which one uses the same optics. It is people looking into rates into the blue ... could be better, perhaps it is, presumably, you do not know really.
Klaro, slashCAM should finally buy ne Optics, adjusts the cameras would s.alle, but laughed that then perhaps not Canon or Nikon in the lead, has not it? :-)))
Is apparently difficult to accept, such a result ..... Why aggressive way? I think holding a Comparison of the image for difficult when a serious factor as the Optics is ignored completely. The fact that the GH2 better compression is beyond question, yet the kit lenses per se almost scrap and show no semblance of a synonymous with what the cameras.
Antwort von pilskopf:
The 14-42 of GH2 is really not particularly sharp all say. The old kit to 45 was sharper.
Antwort von Filmo:
may be so great that GH2, so useful to me seems a test in which one uses the same optics. It is people looking into rates into the blue ... could be better, perhaps it is, presumably, you do not know really.
Klaro, slashCAM should finally buy ne Optics, adjusts the cameras would s.alle, but laughed that then perhaps not Canon or Nikon in the lead, has not it? :-)))
Is apparently difficult to accept, such a result .....
Why aggressive way? I think holding a Comparison of the image for difficult when a serious factor as the Optics is ignored completely. The fact that the GH2 better compression is beyond question, yet the kit lenses per se almost scrap and show no semblance of a synonymous with what the cameras. This was not really aggressive;
What do you suggest, with what looks for slashCAM should perform the tests? Apart from the fact that one must take what one is sent?
Will always be a compromise, some will always be someone chosen Optics-synonymous and the test site at all in question.
Antwort von toxitobi:
With each use of the optics can take pictures dissolve much higher than 2.1 mp. Why then should the optics are not enough to synonymous NEN HDVideo aufzuehmen. I would almost say a little blurred pictures at the 550d for example through the Aperture 1.4 alla ising make less artifact than a wicked knack for sharp Optics Aperture 5.6. Standard lens or not, the sensor and the processor are just as responsible for a good picture. Unfortunately, each station everything was really sharp and well before mess.
Greeting Toxitobi
Antwort von AKED:
It is widely written that the GH2 video is the best DSLR camera. (I find synonymous, I have a GH13 and the GH2).
But you could not even against the GH2 the best camcorder for free to see, so where is the DSLR video technology in Comparison with the conventional Camncorde?
Namely in terms of results (Picture and sound) as synonymous to handling.
I would find very interesting times, a thrust Cross Country Comparison.
Antwort von cantsin:
It is widely written that the GH2 video is the best DSLR camera. (I find synonymous, I have a GH13 and the GH2). Hi, am curious to hear of your experiences with both cameras. Apart of some better comfort functions of GH2, there is a significant difference in image quality? - Provided the GH13 hack of course. Over here, little is resilient to find out.
Antwort von Angry_C:
Yes a Comparison between GH2 and prosumer camcorders would interest me synonymous. The image quality here, because that a camcorder has many benefits in handling, is anyway clear.
Antwort von Angry_C:
It is widely written that the GH2 video is the best DSLR camera. (I find synonymous, I have a GH13 and the GH2).
Hi, am curious to hear of your experiences with both cameras. Apart of some better comfort functions of GH2, there is a significant difference in image quality? - Provided the GH13 hack of course. Over here, little is resilient to find out. Have synonymous both cameras, ie, a GH13 and a GH2.
In 24p mode, the camera GH2 in my opinion provides for due to the progressive image the better picture quality, with no preference which Ptools settings. Good, you can set the GH13 24/25p synonymous, but then it can be in scenes with many details (lawn, trees, etc.) come to crashes. I have therefore not progressive filmed with the GH13.
In 50i mode turns the whole thing to. Here is the GH13 is way better than the 50i and the GH2 synonymous the tuned 720 p30 MJPEG mode of GH13 with 80-100 and 422 Mbit bedeutent better than the MJPEG mode of GH2.
the 720p50 mode so far I could compare it yet.
Antwort von schu:
I have recently made an interesting photo shop still rolling shutter Comparison: Let the GH2 and my Canon 5D MII and then run with my photo reingeblitzt clippers. The 5D had flashed up a little more than half a Picture, GH2 the other hand, usually a whole. Also in the crop (Digitel) mode. This means that the GH2 probably less inclined lines makes for panning and less jelly in hand-held camera. Was synonymous with the swinging test a similar feeling. One should repeat the test two more times under laboratory conditions.
Only in wild pans there were a few times in the desert artifacts GH2, not as bad as in the GH1 and regularly (I have my time again so sold), but very clear and flat. Unfortunately, I have not checked the data rate again. because someone has some experience?
Antwort von MarcTGFG:
Have synonymous both cameras, ie, a GH13 and a GH2.
...
In 50i mode turns the whole thing to. Here is the GH13 is way better than the 50i and the GH2 synonymous the tuned 720 p30 MJPEG mode of GH13 with 80-100 and 422 Mbit bedeutent better than the MJPEG mode of GH2.
I will not stand up so your statement to be false, but so far I've really only read in reviews that the GH2 provides a much better picture than the GH1 and indeed by far. Makes the higher data rate because of the hack so much from when sesnor but the weaknesses and the processor is simply overworked?
I would like to see as a Comparison under controlled conditions!
That said, I think data rates of 80-100 Mbit an imposition on the storage requirements. I will not have to buy every month an additional hard drive.
I alone have the handling advantages (continuous auto focus, more manual control, "clean" HDMI out, better LCD, 2xCineZoom, high-resolution photos without interrupting video recording, etc) is reason enough to prefer the GH2 GH1 with the hack.
Antwort von Angry_C:
Oh yes, the hack makes a lot.
The users screamed as the hack came out, "We have a new camera for Lau" get.
If you like the features of the new GH2 and the slightly better 24p mode twice the price are worth it but Panasonic has done everything right.
I've got me so synonymous, although I with the GH1 (3) was very satisfied synonymous.
A soon to leave me but I just does not know what :-)
Antwort von handiro:
I was again left the GH2. For my job, the GH13 is better, forever video (not 29.59 min), cheap Batteries, 40BPS 720p 50 without jello and codec crashes, etc. ...
Once the GH2 Vitaly crumbles I'm interested again.
Had no time to make a Comparison would be interesting times .... there are certain to dvxuser?
No matter: the GH2 gabs with the Grützglas 14-42 for 800, which almost half is what cost the GH1 in May 2009! It is even cheaper. And it makes great good videos!! (Good luck with your search for batteries)
