Infoseite // Test: FINAL CUT STUDIO 3 - PART 3/Motion 4 & Compressor 3.5 & Conclusion



Newsmeldung von slashCAM:


Test: test: FINAL CUT STUDIO 3 - PART 3/Motion 4 & & Compressor 3.5 Conclusion of rob - 1 oct 2009 17:41:00
Dedicate> In the last part of our Final Cut Studio 3 we review the new features of Motion 4 and Compressor 3.5 before we get to the total Conclusion of Final Cut Studio 3rd Motion 4 provides our opinion, the Final Cut Studio 3 software package with the most important innovations is ...

full article

Space


Antwort von 407621:

How they had to write: "Apple has apparently not necessary ..." That is very unfortunate that Apple does not flash Encodiermöglichkeit and an insufficient BluRay compromise offers. The 64-bit version could have been quietly implemented in the wake of 10.6 and 64. Because I would have gladly synonymous still 1 / 2 years or longer synonymous waited. Unfortunately, I have the impression that Apple was keeping tight spot in the Adobe and Avid somewhat oppose. Too bad!

Space



Antworten zu ähnlichen Fragen //


No transfer of Motion for Final Cut
slow motion in Final Cut
Worth doing Final Cut Studio for hobbyists?
New thoughts on Final Cut Studio 4
Final Cut Studio 3 -> XXX? -> Blu-Ray
Final Cut Studio 2 / 3
Mac Final Cut Studio / Adobe Master Collection, or at PC
Includes Final Cut Studio Quciktime pro?
News of Apple Final Cut Studio with over 100 new features
Final Cut Studio 2 installation
Final Cut Studio 2 Tour
Final Cut Studio or Final Cut HD which is better?




slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash