Frage von Tuvok:
what is with macro? which sunscreens or surface mounted diaphragm as it is called I need an objective for that? which polfilter? as is the menu? I could see that with that of the white balance menu, so dumb symbols in my Nilkon standing inside, daily, art, sunlight and all I know. that's great.
number or with the iso, the iso images at 400 s.tag contrast to iso 100? or business in one, or what is with HDR, how does the process, you have macro photos, images you've already made mti 140 and 200 mm, as there is the difference of a tower from us.w
can you tell more?
as the G 2 in contrast to the Nex 5, one notices the smaller sensor compared to the Nex 5 of sony?
what is with The leica lenses are the better when looking at the adjusted bidler s.monitor looks or you realize that only when enlarged? s.welcher if so?
So some ask.
used or because of the example finder, why is the finder of G 10 as bad as what is so bad in contrast to the G 2? obvious from the touchscreen that you need him so much?
I have made some photos, quality program in Automatic, jpg fine, iso 400 is better than the same settings on my Nikon P 80 with iso 100 in the media market there with light. they are brighter and clearer but one thing is komsich, the color geäfllt with nikon me better, everything seems warmer in the G 2 yesterday everything was sterile, why?
worth it because in the purchase of expensive genuine?
579 for the camera, 899 for the objective, 2 x 90 ¬ for accurate, 30 ¬ for the bag which tapers conically as sharp, which is great, less tele, 140 instead of 210 mm as my Nikon P 80, then polfilter - 100 ¬, sun visor when I know what times - 100 ¬, macro - 500 ¬?
yes I get there at 2000 ¬ in contrast to the Nikon P 100 by 359 ¬
So eingie frange hope will answer.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
So there are definitely people with the symbols are clearly times you look here
http://verkehrszeichen.kfz-auskunft.de/verkehrszeichen_gefahrzeichen.html
...........................
ISO 100 is where the opportunity to draw to select it before.
...........................
be 140 mm or 200 mm kan no preference when you can shorten the distance to the object.
...........................
Nikon colors almost always with the best.
Otherwise, the only ne question of taste or is can be done mostly via Gradiations curves adjustment s.PC later.
..............................
Which of the two cams (Pana Nikon) is now no better plan.
Look at two times the Olympus PEN s.die is synonymous fine to use - can synonymous Leica or Voigtlander Lenses.
..................................
Leica is one of the top producers in terms of optics. Whether this really directly see, you can thus only be assessed once hard.
If I your pictures from the DSLR forum in memory call, I think the times you do not need a Leica.
Leica to buy if you really want to tickle the last drop out s.Quali.
........................................
Batteries you should behold if you get the replicas are so with 90, - / pc not exactly cheap.
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von Tuvok:
panasonic accurate replicas do not exist
what can we please get out lenses for leica choose?
the 1000 ¬ or more must indeed have meaningful?
and pay such a camera? since one is soon to 2000
a nikon p 100 costs 359
which synonymous macro
g 2 has not a macro or objectively? L
