Frage von ruessel:
Picture in the appendix.
Source: www.sonyhdvinfo.com
Finally a 20x lens ..... where all the controls of the FX1 is gone?
Antwort von Markus:
[fx1 -> fx7] ..... where all the controls of the FX1 is gone? Does seem the same as in HC1 -> HC3, which is less rather than more. ;-)
Antwort von Fenris:
Then Ingo was right :-)
http://forum.slashcam.de/viewtopic.php?p=157400 # 157,400
Antwort von wolfgang:
Even if the devices will be powerful - I wonder the same, sitting where the controls. They would have me as important. should go about only touchscreen that would be a ko-criterion for me.
But we wait and see.
Antwort von Ingo zitiert:
Sonyhat which have long been in the drawer ... but there was simply no competition for FX1/Z1 introduce synonymous therefore no reason for a successor.
After all, the FX1 since October 2004 is available in stores ......
The New called HDR-FX7 and will be equipped with 3 CMOS sensors (presumably Clearvid). Thus, the FX7 will be the brightest, which will then have to be affordable.
Moreover Sonyeine donated completely neugerechnete Optics and the camcorder is a little thinner (such as PDR-170).
So wait ..... For October, we know more
Antwort von 911:
Even if the devices will be powerful - I wonder the same, sitting where the controls. They would have me as important. should go about only touchscreen that would be a ko-criterion for me.
But we wait and see. Is it even still, the professional version of the FX7, the HVR-V1E.
Antwort von wolfgang:
Right. And provide an alternative wirds ja synonymous of Canon devices in this category.
Antwort von ruessel:
Meanwhile, I'm filming for 2 days with the FX7 a bit, this camera has even 3 Assign buttons more than Fx1, although hidden behind the LCD screen but still. From the handling ago, the FX7 does not hide behind the FX1 .... just the sound level has become worse, the Fx1 least still had an extra Einstellrädchen for it.
Antwort von wolfgang:
Which is synonymous urgently needed if we are to use an external microphone. I drive around with my Sennheiser MKE300 ever level in manual mode, and so regulated from the Einstellstufe 4 - simply because the MKE300 is so sensitive that otherwise the background noise is too high.
Too bad if you have planned for the FX7 not even a simple potentiometer of Sonyaus - because as I understand it now.
Antwort von Peter Friesen:
Dear People,
as you can see I'm new here, so with the request for a little indulgence.
Now my question: are there with the Sony FX 7 of problems when I work with a FX 7 of America (USA) in Germany. (PAL / NTSC) Or is this difference in HDV system is no longer relevant?
Thank you for your help
MfG
Peter Friesen
Antwort von Jan:
Hi Peter,
has been answered here many times before, the American FX 7 (if that's the name) 1080 / 60 i, our 1080 / 50i.
The top model of the rival (FX 1) of the Z 1 would be perfect for you.
If you can choose whether or not in the camera 50i oer 60i recording.
VG
Jan
Antwort von Videofilmer:
We have the Video Association of both the FX7 and the XH-A1 tested.
In the FX7 looks bad! The A1 is significantly sharper and more sensitive to light! In the latest issue of Computer Video CV from December, we found confirmed our findings. There are at least 7 points, which cuts off the A1 better. Curiously, the test results were VideoAktiv in the output of different ... The tester has obviously not paying attention during filming of the test charts. The next Stammtisch Video Cams because we have both, since anyone can even take a picture of it. Dates under www.videostammtisch.de
Incidentally, the majority of broadcasters are using the new HDV now synonymous Proficassette of Panasonic, the AY-DVM63AMQ.
Antwort von Frank B.:
Hello,
I have long between FX 1 and FX 7 wavered. On the FX 7 has irritated me the HDMI output. Ultimately, though, I opted for the FX1, because of the 1 / 3 inch chips. The FX 7 MUs is more of a throwback to the Bildqaualität - Theme depth of field.
Frank
Antwort von Jan:
I can not judge the A 1, because I only know of the reports, which will already be the truth.
But likely to have properly calibrated without the A 1 be the worse rather than in the Picture FX 1 & 7
Yes well the light sensitivity is already a trace in less than FX 7 VX 2100 & PD 170 do I have to recognize clearly, especially because I often just turn the area in lowlight.
Yes the FX 7 must be to the chagrin of the smaller 1 / 4 "chips to compensate for the depth stop by the larger zoom, which is not always easy.
Well, the very smearfreien CMOS images, 20x optical zoom can already get an advantage.
The Special FX 7 has not, as the FX 1 eg
-The level meter, even in auto mode
Peaking-enhanced (edge enhancement in red, yellow or white (FX 1))
In Auto-Focus with readjust the focus ring
LCD viewfinder and the same time - what I know of the PD 170, unfortunately, the viewfinder is in Color
- Zebra and Peaking at the same time
- FX 7 takes considerably less power
- The slow motion and 1 Megapixel photos (well)
- The quick entry for an HDV VX or PD filmmakers - Size and
Buttons (location) are very similar
- 6 keys provable vewendbar infinitely eg with Focus, Peaking, Spotlight, markers, etc or the respective selbsteingestellten Picture profiles
are not synonymous bad.
The Better by 5 mm wide, the level control outside of the camera, S-Video and the somewhat better lowlight Picture indicate clearly for the FX 1st
VG
Jan
Antwort von Ponticulus:
Where can I place in which the FX7 HDV 1440 x 1080/25p mode?
I have often searched for in the instructions after that - there's not that.
The part can now read and progressive record or not? Who knows what?
Greeting
Antwort von ruessel:
Where can I place in which the FX7 HDV 1440 x 1080/25p mode? Not at all, which can only "professional" version of the V1.
Antwort von Ponticulus:
Where can I place in which the FX7 HDV 1440 x 1080/25p mode?
Not at all, which can only "professional" version of the V1. Too bad - again only half-images and the trouble with it ...
Perhaps a slashCAM the appropriate entry could change the camcorder Test Page.
Thanks and greetings
Antwort von Eisbär:
All in all, one's decision is not made just so easy to price are the two not so far apart, but it has now spoiled for choice. After the clips at fxsupport.de I find the colors and the sharpness of the FX7 as much angehmer than the FX1. Is that with the smaller Wide Anglewirklich so bad? 20-fold Tele sounds very tempting, for underwater shots because of the size and weight, the FX7 is determined first choice for shooting with a device in this class.
Can it really be so hard? I'm not sure synonymous, but I would absolutely have one of the two, because I'll be two years in Australia.
Gruss
Eisbär
Antwort von Jan:
Hello,
hab mal kurz je 2 test pictures with the DSR 170 vs HDR FX 7 made, both in the DV mode. Shutter 1 / 50 sec, and WAG artificial light. Zoombedingt Aperture f 2.4 to f 2.8 (FX 7).
The clip is not quite the same, just like the position is not 100% - just short draufgehalten.
I must say that was the moment, in principle, almost no light in the hall, except a few small spots. It must be said, however, when the stage lighting is completely there, believe the FX synonymous 7th
I had little time, we have both cameras side by side so infrequently.
VG
Jan
Antwort von firlefanz:
hello in the round,
'm new here and have decided to fx7.
In my opinion in the "ready to race" superior to the mode s.haushoch. ask why I have to adjust everything to get a quality s.The fx7 in automatikmosud too?
With the sony binich clear immediately come tiefenschärfe? not really a problem.
the one hand, always wanted to cinema feeling, so no clinically Depth of the other video is here really criticized niveu the highest. hier gehts really about nuances. Wide angle is somewhat smaller advantage for me of, just then when we built up only smaller, and so has the disposal stage montages. Extra Credit, the s.ein time-consuming hobby, you can even adjust the numerous knöpferl with software, I gladly and voluntarily waived it.
my humble opinion-lg
Antwort von firlefanz:
Depth of? not really a problem. If just depends, which claims it has. On my Canon XM1 (1 / 4 inches) I was always annoyed that they did not hinbekam as good as my old Sony VX 1000 (1 / 3 inch). So I was very skeptical when I read the data from the FX 7. But I must say that I could never live a try. Could it be that the deficiency with its larger zoom range somewhat compensated, but I do not really trust the store. The XM-1 has been synonymous a technical opt 20th Zoom. Therefore prudent to me but I opted for the FX 1st With its picture quality, I am very happy and finally I can experiment a little once synonymous with the depth of field. For me this was an important criterion for choosing the camcorder. Similarly, as the most important parameter settings, just s.Gehäuse have. Also in the FX 7 is somewhat regressive. Well, smaller design calls for just a tribute. On the other hand, they would certainly be large enough to accommodate even more s.Gehäuse. One criticism s.der FX 1, which has struck me is the possibility of evidence Assign buttons. Here you can assign only few parameters (total 6), some of senseless (Aperture to white or black) or redundant (Bars / Color Bars - are once this button is above) below the viewfinder. Better I would have found some picture profiles that can be set via menu assign you to. This is not possible. Anyway, it is still failing me. Unfortunately I do not know how it is resolved s.der FX 7th Also, the adjustable "Shot Transitions are a great feature s.der FX 1st For an automatic shift in picture sharpness in different speeds is possible. Has the FX 7 synonymous?
All in all I have, I believe, made a right decision, although I have some features s.der FX gereitzt 7 synonymous. But you can not have it all.
I would obviously prefer to have the Canon A1, but 500, - Euro more, despite a lower list price, it gave me, unfortunately, not possible.
Gruß Frank
Antwort von Jan:
Yes the FX Shot transition is synonymous 7th
The LCD top the FX 1 s.Henkel synonymous has its appeal.
At the end a point and her superior ....
VG
Jan
Antwort von firlefanz:
Depth of? not really a problem.
With its picture quality, I am very happy and finally I can experiment a little once synonymous with the depth of field. For me this was an important criterion for choosing the camcorder. Similarly, as the most important parameter settings, just s.Gehäuse have.
.....
One criticism s.der FX 1, which has struck me is the possibility of evidence Assign buttons. Here you can assign only few parameters (total 6), some of senseless (Aperture to white or black) or redundant (Bars / Color Bars - are once this button is above) below the viewfinder. Better I would have found some picture profiles that can be set via menu assign you to. This is not possible. Anyway, it is still failing me. Unfortunately I do not know how it is resolved s.der FX 7th Also, the adjustable "Shot Transitions are a great feature s.der FX 1st For an automatic shift in picture sharpness in different speeds is possible. Has the FX 7 synonymous?
....
Gruß Frank ...
the absence of some meaningful parameters
in the allocation and assign zb. flicker red. bothers me synonymous
but the image profile can be assigntasten put on the 6
And the shot of course, synonymous with the transition gibts fx7 ..
gruß cj
Antwort von Frank B.:
J
At the end a point and her superior ....
I was so synonymous. But I think in these parts, there is not much, what could be wrong. One way or another.
Frank
Antwort von Elch_111:
servus frank
As stated before, we criticize then very high () semiprof niveu.
fx1 + fx7 sure TopCams.
what disk but here in the. often goes down: here are compared, although the 1/4coll the fx7 chips with 1 / 3 inch chips, however, does not discuss the fx7 the cmos has installed sensors. So I am thrilled to produce instantaneous lowlightmodus a commissioned film on vogelspinnen here gehts in regards to Case was already hunting prey speed etc, are there ccd `s rather a disadvantage. also had no flags, etc. for swivel
Finally, I was still convinced of the 6 assigntasten un 20X zoom. stately times what you want at the price more?
For me a lot of points mentioned above are more important than a pseudo25f.
video video will look if the movie is soo extremely crucial, then please s.zur leasing bank and then to the dealer a 35mm.
Such discussions, I have tonstudio in similar form in the area: I have a digital mixer please, but would welcome the warmth of an analogue desk, how goes it? ;-)))
until now I was absolutely convinced fx7.
has the fx1 or synonymous s.den quick record mode? synonymous for me as very important.
If my project is finished I put a link to look clean.
lg thomas
Antwort von Frank B.:
Hello Thomas,
You certainly right that we must decide, depending on the application. So who is often filmed in low light (eg, animal observations), which is designed to meet the FX 7th For me it was in the 1 / 3 inch chips are not primarily concerned with the sensitivity to light, but more about the depth of field. I film quite rare in lowlight area, or had the opportunity in these cases to light. Personally I consider a somewhat larger synonymous Wide Anglewichtiger as more tele. A well-known has now synonymous the FX 7 to them, or maybe I have an opportunity now time to look at them closer to me.
The purchase of my FX1 but I have yet to repent.
Frank
Antwort von Elch_111:
what I lack in the tests is indicative
suitability to the everyday.
zb. if it is true that the s.im auto mode
not as good, and the viewfinder / display is too small
wirds outdoors without additional monitor well
difficult than with the fx1/fx7.
in the studio recordings under constant light conditions
With additional monitor is certainly the s.klar better ....
The tests show that even synonymous!
gruß cj
