Frage von Tobias:Hello,
Here is a short film from the horror genre: "Fresh"
The film has received in other forums (like the VFX-Forum) good reviews. Hopefully it will be here as well.
The link:
Hiqh quality version: www.tg-studio.de/download/fresh.php (50 MB)
Low-quality version: www.tg-studio.de/download/freshlow.php (25 MB)
About criticisms, I would be very happy. I am particularly pleased synonymous when reviews are posted in my forum www.tg-studio.de/forum (registration not required)
Thanks and love greetings
Tobias
www.tg-studio.de
Antwort von mint400:
The VFX at 00:45 I find not so great, this would have been less is more. (The burning car wreck would justifiable, but the scattered corpses really are not the hammer)
Otherwise, I have liked your project.
Antwort von Tobias:
I thank you mint400. Is there anyone else like to say of his mind?
Antwort von KArz:
Lustiger of past and effectively Splatter!
THX!
Antwort von Axel:
Fun. Winking grades as constructive criticism wanted?
Idea: 2; cut (timing): 3; Camera: 3-4; Cast: 4, FX (digital): 3-4; FX () Props: 1-2; Sound: 2; Music: 2 (not very spectacular but fitting) Production Design (arenas) Costumes: 4
The less good scores allowed themselves with more care and planning to improve slightly.
Antwort von Tobias:
Hello,
Karz thank you :-)
@ Axel
Well, you're a very critical ;-) That is not meant negatively. For once, of course, a heartfelt Thank you really go into all aspects of film.
Could you justify again the actors Note (4)?
Comic fashion, all notes that are bad for you (with the exception of the digital effects) of other well-judged. Especially the camera work and the actors performance.
Would be nice if you were once again slightly more accurate to say :-)
In any case: Thanks!
Antwort von Axel:
That's why I wrote "wink". The evaluation standard is a bit hard for a no-budget film.
@ Editing: A breathless flight? Rather an aimless wanderings. If it could be shortened and finetune. Too few hard cuts (Total> Close up), had brought the tempo.
@ Camera: If I show as narrator to the audience something or my hand-held camera takes the panic view of the hero? What took you
so for
me, once chosen
as one and pulls it completely out of the trance. If you had you imagined the scene as if in a dream and tried to translate the 1-1 draw in a storyboard, you would have the better hingekriegt. Okay, many C-Pictures make the same mistake, and it makes a parody, but for me it's does not work as intended.
@ Cast: Panik to play is very difficult. Overacting is almost mandatory. The shocked exclamations and moans certainly seem like a anime cartoon and as unconvincing. A vastly exaggerated crying, panting, with-the-arms-waving and eye-of-the-caves entry would have been appropriate, and certainly the horror of "More".
@ Production Design: The scenes are okay, well, what with the Digi-FX was obviously meant. You may have trusted too much that you were
on the right track. Through better planning would you have with Camera, Lighting and simply cut
more out. Be happy that it pleases you, and others. You have something on his feet. The next time your claim will be s.euch increased. Peace & fun continues in this mad media.