Frage von MUK:
Hello friends GH2 and the tester the many hacks. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Since I have little time to hack my way through the web world on the net to google, \u003cbr /\u003e right now a PPAR a.euch questions. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e First Do I need for a hack (which always synonymous) again, the firmware 1.0, if so, where exactly can I download the original again? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Second How do I play one a hack? As the FW update? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Third The Hack Is it in the camera until I einspiele an original FW, or only on the map as Canon? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e 4th The crucial question. What is the hack you can now really recommend? \u003cbr /\u003e So what brings me a.meisten image quality at the lowest bit rate? \u003cbr /\u003e Because the bit I do not want to raise impossible to Kartenausfaelle to avoid spelling errors and of course, to save space. \u003cbr/> \u003cbr /\u003e 5th All the hacks Aufnahmedauerbeschraenkung be repealed? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e 6th How the camera behaves, after update to a hack? If you \u003cbr /\u003e unstable, thus depends on love? You get a temperature problem? I have to count with other disadvantages? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e 7th Where is the coveted invites a.sichersten hack down? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e 8th Can I hack the bitrate beleibig every high place, so \u003cbr /\u003e even try to work with BR which I want, or are \u003cbr /\u003e the fixed values? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e 9th How lets the material cut (Experience Premiere CS5)? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e 10th As for benefits, except for a windchill Schaerfegewinn, has your view even after your favorite hack? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e I look forward to your answers
 |
Antwort von philbird:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von gekkonier:
* Facepalm *
Antwort von domain:
I have not watched the entire hacker community and analyzed, but basically I need something other hand, and not only because of the time required. \u003cbr /\u003e Either the camera takes of the house of my properties to be DESIRED with or I will not. Fell me not in a dream, because what to download, test and, although I imagine even possible that this may lead to very intense experiences, similar to a Goldgraeberstimmung with the motto: doing a fairly inexpensive camera, a quasi-Alexa , everything is possible and nothing is impossible.
Antwort von WoWu:
@ MUK \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Wait, wait just a little while .....
Antwort von MUK:
\u003cspan style=\
Antwort von domain:
The situation is quite simple. Vitally, it should be one, or as the means successfully to demonstrate the Pana-house programmer, then will not splash out for long. Thus, even in the GH3 to be expected with an optimized firmware that can chop is also not so easy and it will hopefully put an end to the nightmare.
Antwort von WoWu:
@ MUK \u003cbr /\u003e ..... discovered until Stalin Brigade Vitallys Your Request and you make the victim. \u003cbr /\u003e And you can, with wise preparation, they now seem to forget everything that you ever learn about cameras, but after the brainwashing you do not need it anyway.
Antwort von MUK:
"Expect to have in the GH3 with an optimized firmware that can chop is also not so easy and so will hopefully have the nightmare to an end." \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e I think quite the opposite is the case. Due to the great success of the Panasonic GH1 Hacke has actually improved the GH2 only marginally. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e I think for this Panasonic is a great marketing and Hackerei no reason with a GH3 hack over a trump. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e I think it is synonymous for no coincidence that months after the introduction of the GH2 nohackbare FW and suddenly was in circulation after the first \u003cbr /\u003e Purchase a hackbare waves asleep on FW dips. Clever with the product strategy to stay in the conversation. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Also, I'm not quite sure what was your intention with the PanasonicFW followed the introduction of 1.1. In my opinion, both the 25p mode, which is curious as synonymous and the 01.01 he weaker 24p mode in the than in the FW 1.0. Did you assume evil, one could think that the Panasonic GH2 has deteriorated to deliberately not his next \u003cbr /\u003e Kanibalisieren to 101, which hung behind because of my opinion of the pure image quality, the GH2. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Be that as it is. For me is the Question, after I with the GH2 \u003cbr /\u003e 1.1 is no longer so happy, I'm going back to 1.0. If so, where can I get the original FW? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e My second possible alternative - a hack on it, but the should not come at the expense The Aufnahmestabilitaet and I think everything \u003cbr /\u003e what is more than 40 Mbps bit rate is absurd. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e What do you think
|
|
Antwort von wenzel chris:
And ... why are there no colors donated the gh2 hack the sound? ... that would not bring the bitrate particularly raise even more heat problems, but make the camera suitable for everyday use
Antwort von Frank B.:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von MUK:
" \u003cbr /\u003e ..... discovered until Stalin Brigade Vitallys Your Request and you make the victim. \u003cbr /\u003e And you can, with wise preparation, they now seem to forget everything that you ever learn about cameras, but after the brainwashing you do not need it anyway. " \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e What do you mean now? Is that sarcasm or do you want me to say that I will blow High Vitally hack?
Antwort von NEEL:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von WoWu:
@ MUK \u003cbr /\u003e No, him playing on it and make your own experiences. \u003cbr /\u003e I can turn was located, to see if you do something else a.Image and I have been playing the I-frame hack because we live synonymous of good pictures and use every opportunity to improve it. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e But it benefits me nothing, if now and again disappears and an image synonymous not know if I can recognize noverwertbare image enhancement. \u003cbr /\u003e Besides, None here and we are well placed to judge pictures. \u003cbr /\u003e But some people are already helping with a placebo. \u003cbr /\u003e The main thing is feels good after that .... So, make time.
Antwort von domain:
You were there, quite frankly, even into increased slightly in Wenceslas. \u003cbr /\u003e I now have several comparisons between the GH2 as synonymous and seen the newer Canons Native Instruments. Of course there is a difference in the primaries color representation, but is not the tragic and certainly not as dramatic as you try to portray him. \u003cbr /\u003e The very differences between the FX1 and XF100 are bigger, not to mention between XF100 and HX9V. \u003cbr /\u003e It concerns, however, only a few degrees in the primaries and color correction is already at least as compatible with everything that you can cut it together.
Antwort von Frank B.:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von WoWu:
@ Domain \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Chris is so right .... The Hack would have preferred to apply a service menu, with which it comes clean in the parameter (or a GUI, with which you can set a few) take such rubbish because there were plenty of potential for improvement.
Antwort von olja:
@ MUK \u003cbr /\u003e If you do not have the time, you gather up the pecking history, seek at least once, the results bring a hack Sun Possibly. would you convince me, then something synonymous aufzuspielen and I participate a.einem Manual. \u003cbr /\u003e I gave up and habs is in any case it still managed to anybody that I'm ready, my zuzurotzen SD's with Datennix. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Animal investing your scarce time left rather in film time, brings more ;-) \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e I collect coins ever, it starts the same .. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e @ Frank B. Yes, with FW 1.1
Antwort von domain:
The skin problem is that the optical filter AA yes on both counts entirely for the birds are. If they still allow nooptimale resolution and more in this video low-pass filters are simply too weak to Alias \u200b\u200b| Wavefront Maya | Wavefront to prevent Mayaing. \u003cbr /\u003e So it is not safe to go in the future, this is the death of filming, Native Instruments, for both should still be suitable as a synonymous for video equally well. \u003cbr /\u003e In the reason, it is only a computational problem, especially since Photoshop shows indeed that a class without downscaling Alias \u200b\u200b| Wavefront Maya | Wavefront Mayaing been a long time is possible, but it probably needs too much computer power.
Antwort von WoWu:
... and it is not moving in Photoshop. It is missing as a frequency. \u003cbr /\u003e But wait a minute from the R-OLPFs. \u003cbr /\u003e The sudden fit again for both applications and even ate in the action set yet. \u003cbr /\u003e Wait, wait just a little while ... :-)) \u003cbr /\u003e Greetings to Vienna. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e (Because Lavrenti is still not shown up? \u003cbr /\u003e -He is not going to be sick)?
Antwort von hubse:
Hi, \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e I had my time over synonymous sets ne buy GH2, and as I recall, many owners of very sharp on GH2 hacks (see for example here: http://www.slashcam.de/info/EOSHD-COM-veroeffentlicht-eigene GH2-hacks-533810.html). \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e So if I understand correctly, then bring the whole hack and nothing makes you look in the camera just broke? \u003cbr /\u003e Best regards, \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e hubse
Antwort von WoWu:
no, not broken. \u003cbr /\u003e You will not only get better. \u003cbr /\u003e But that's just like with all placebos ..... some of them help. \u003cbr /\u003e And that's synonymous something.
Antwort von domain:
Vitaly is the big "The Emperor's New Clothes" story teller. \u003cbr /\u003e But already there was a naive child and could not wear a veil noGaze and discover more about the initials of the Emperor and it was striking and was voiced cheeky. \u003cbr /\u003e But something synonymous to synonymous WoWu, you can not just armies of believers to be persuaded of their guru and Practicing.
Antwort von Natalie:
So apart of the larger files should undso it in a professional environment but give independent quality measurement means measure of subjective impression? Something like a Audio Precision Tone only for the video?
Antwort von WoWu:
Is it synonymous. \u003cbr /\u003e Only those who will make the Muehe, if you have not seen to want to measure something ... and most importantly, why? \u003cbr /\u003e The goal of us are better pictures ... if we do not see that our customers will not see them synonymous. \u003cbr /\u003e So why? \u003cbr /\u003e It was worth a try ... was nothing. \u003cbr /\u003e Or you take the patch 1.1er ..... My God, there's a tiny little thing, the gamma curve flatter .... and everyone cries, muddy images.
Antwort von pilskopf:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von wenzel chris:
would you improve the color, then this would be a real, visible, and above all sensible suggestions ... \u003cbr /\u003e iso 12800, longer than 30 minutes ... who needs the practice in the real?
Antwort von WoWu:
Show examples of times. \u003cbr /\u003e We have namely the well tested in 720 ... \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e So far, however, synonymous here in the forum yet emerged None was able to show the synonymous only a single example, which showed an improvement. \u003cbr /\u003e So, show her. \u003cbr /\u003e And then we can about the times we talk mechanisms by which uses the MPEG4 bitrate down.
Antwort von Axel:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von pilskopf:
I'm not a tester here, I would have done it earlier but not anymore, I do not itch synonymous if anyone thinks it does not, then he should not use it, but mine is totally no preference, I'm feeling about me, not to wenzel or you Wowu. If you are interested, it does make a test, not when there is no preference but anyway Weil you do not care. Wenzel asked what one does and ISO 12 800 I think, is my shit but no preference whether you have something like this as long as I have something like this. At home, I use something very much like that makes a brilliant grain, in S / P tends to be used in the color you need a Entrauscher the discolored grain, Neatvideo example, the grain and leaves a lot - it looks really cool from wobwei self in S / W find really smart. By the way is just days from night
Antwort von WoWu:
But it is nevertheless a step forward ... previously been told, the image would better, now it is not worse at least. \u003cbr /\u003e But, as I said ... every hack is synonymous than synonymous placebo and met Sun's purpose.
Antwort von Natalie:
I find the grains of S / W synonymous horny .. The Fuji S5 Pro is a photo notches that can really beautiful animal noise ... Unfortunately I'm not in the film this creative field, I'm talking to other :-)) \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e I found the HYPE about the hack at first synonymous somehow exciting ..
Antwort von pilskopf:
It can become worse the higher the bitrate, the more noise you get. So this idea so far it is not at all. I do not like these requirements should only ever be discarded six hours of his life so that we get to hear that the test values \u200b\u200band so can not judge it on Vimeo can not anyway. That's really pointless and not worth my time.
Antwort von WoWu:
Is synonymous gift comes out with nothing anyway and the thread starter to play the hack and see if he can use it. And if he feels it is better that he should leave him on it. \u003cbr /\u003e And good is ....
Antwort von pilskopf:
Well as I said, the hack is in addition to other advantages synonymous bit, just who does it. 720p60 is def. The biggest advantage of the hack.
Antwort von NEEL:
It is often the verrissenen Comparison, because youtube compressed: \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e
\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e In the left, shaded part of the picture (the Eiffel tower to the left candle) is the respective pecking sometimes cleaner than the ungehackte variant, but never vice versa. The visible differences are small and who is not just fixated on muscle women, the can with and without the GH2 hack probably use profit margins as good.
Antwort von WoWu:
The thing again. \u003cbr /\u003e You've already seen that the images are not exposed to the same. \u003cbr /\u003e Same crap with the 1.1er version ... difference in the gamma. \u003cbr /\u003e Of these, not to mention the uebertraegt codec only residual aberrations, in such a style of life so it is as, or so called not because he has to carry anything over. So you can screw it up to 500 Mbps. He uebertraegt no piece longer because the encoder receives the same input information. \u003cbr /\u003e And I bet you would change the exposures would any other version of the tap.
Antwort von philbird:
With the hack the image is objectively better. \u003cbr /\u003e Just because WoWu has not seen any evidence, would the gebuegen its requirements does not mean that people would like Philip Bloom, de etc EOSHD people of noah planning. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Whether you need it ne is quite another Question, but that "the hack does nothing at all about anyway ... blablabla .... placebo" is just noise to yourself only. I can say that improved the persoelich VanikkahAck Besispiel to buld the visible. \u003cbr /\u003e Hatersgonnahate
