Frage von Reinhard S:
Hi,
Short version: after a long abstinence from (; holiday) DV editing hobby - I've got here much sooner with mixed - I'm thinking to revive the hobby again, or switch to HD. Since I am not up to date, there's a lot of questions:
[list = * [1: baf4775068]: baf4775068] If I make a SonyXR520VE wrong with what - or there's alternatives? [*: would baf4775068] How to take in the new DV editing PC to cut as with Edius HD movies ( ; what mobo, which Prozzi ,...)?[*: baf4775068] What you will get your finished film on the plasma TV? That is, there's plug-in cards for PCs with HDMI output - or have the same Blue-ray-Brenner/Player ago? [*: Baf4775068] Does something about it, stay with Edius to get here and be an update? [*: Baf4775068] Is it otherwise still stumbling blocks? [/ list: o: baf4775068] Thx
Reinhard
Supplement / Long: I've started with video films and-cut, when DV came out, only with a PC-7E, then PC-100E, VX-1000 and - because I received the occasional dropouts on my nerves - with a PD 150 in the DVCAM format. Sliced I have with Media Studio, Premiere and Edius. The last cam was somehow a bad investment - fürn leave too big, too conspicuous, too cumbersome. The children have become grown up and camera-shy - the hobby fell asleep and the PD is 150 with very few hours in the closet
In retrospect, I must say that I had with the VX-1000 the most pleasure - she was straightforward, the size of her fürn leave just yet suitable and audiomäßig unproblematic - even the onboard Micro was useful.
Meanwhile, I've come to the conclusion that it is better for my needs, not to a grain quality, and to take a smaller cam for shooting in foreign countries not to attract attention (and I was often asked where, of which TV company I come ...). That is, rather a not so good in the box as a recording due to fussiness / unusual etc. are not made for great recording.
Add to my wish-Cam: I've already read that XR520VE is both good, but not much has manual settings - so you can live anyway? If the audio part is good and you pass through an external micro - despite automatic - good results, I would be sufficient. Or maybe the Panasonic HDC-HS300? Good sound without buzzing / chirping, manual setting of exposure, and less sensible lowlight capabilities *) would be important to me.
*) I've read 'already, that brings about more Sonyunter Lowlight - exactly where the weaknesses lie in the Panasonic (; because the manual from the 3CCD and opportunities but scores)? And brings you the manual through judicious intervention (control; At the VX-1000's manual was somewhat synonymous)?
Antwort von beiti:
1) If the price does not scare you, you do not do much wrong with the XR520VE. Only consideration would be whether you really want a model with hard drive, or prefer a more modern, the only recording to memory cards (; as insensitive and down).
2) If you benutzst in the Edius HQ codec, the requirements s.den Calculator (very small, with me the HD editing works smoothly with a 5 year old Athlon 3500 +). But you also can take almost any calculator. The main thing you have a lot of disk space for the large AVIs HQ (; s.besten) as eSATA disks.
3) The best solution is presently a small player like the
WD-TV 4) If you want to work with HQ codec is nothing wrong. Disadvantages of HQ codec are the large space requirements and the fact that you have to convert the files before editing.
If you want to cut native AVCHD, Sony Vegas to Edius would be the better choice; synonymous Calculator would be an incredibly fast due.
5) Always. ;)
Antwort von Reinhard S:
Hi beit,
> Or prefer a more modern, the only recording to memory cards (; as insensitive and down).
Did you then the Panasonic HDC-HS300? I'm going assume that can write to SD / SDHC not just photos, but synonymous video. Furthermore, I assume, that turns off the HDD (-> no buzz) when you want to write to SDHC. Right?
> ... HQ Codec benutzst, the requirements are very low ... s.den Calculator
Because you make me hope that it does cut my old computer - 3.4GHz Intel, 2GB RAM - with HQ codec yet. Two fat HDDs (; SATA) and it was purely - provisionally - fit (; with the fact that you have to convert). Right?
> If you want to cut native AVCHD, Sony Vegas to Edius would be the better choice; synonymous Calculator would be an incredibly fast due.
What can Vegas better, which justifies (an acclimation and purchase a full version, in contrast to the Edius update)?
Thx
Reinhard
Antwort von beiti:
I'm going assume that can write to SD / SDHC not just photos, but synonymous video. Furthermore, I assume, that turns off the HDD (-> no buzz) when you want to write to SDHC. Right? Whether the HDD then turn off, I do not know. That should answer anyone who has the part.
Because you make me hope that it does cut my old computer - 3.4GHz Intel, 2GB RAM - with HQ codec yet. Two fat HDDs (; SATA) and it was purely - provisionally - fit (; with the fact that you have to convert). Right? A single SATA HDD does it usually synonymous.
A bottleneck may be the reading speed of a single hard drive only if you need many tracks simultaneously, that would be an argument for RAID-0.
Clue: The HQ codec on-line quality you are coming at data rates between 12 and 16 MB / sec (and the data rate varies in the HQ codec) depending on the complexity of the content. In a recent terabyte hard drive so fit well over 15 hours of material, and the reading speed for 3 to 4 marks should always enough.
What can Vegas better, which justifies (an acclimation and purchase a full version, in contrast to the Edius update)?
Vegas can not play AVCHD liquid unshifted and even dominated Smart Rendering with AVCHD (; what I know, currently no other software). So Vegas is the first choice if you want to cut directly with AVCHD.
Virgin AVCHD editing (; is so) without converting the long term, the goal of all software vendors, and there Sonyderzeit a quality advantage over other companies have. With your 3.4-GHz Intel that will not work out anyway, so far you'd have to buy not just Vegas, but a new Calculator synonymous.
I think the intermediate cut of Edius today for the best solution, unless one wants to invest in the latest hardware. I use it myself so synonymous (; with Edius Neo).
It's amazing: My Calculator is too lame to AVCHD or HD video play back smoothly on YouTube. Not even HDV (; MPEG2) can be smoothly with editing my chest. With the HQ codec, but everything runs very smooth.
Another tip s.Rande:
Here
Antwort von Bidone:
I can recommend to you the WD-TV system, synonymous only.
Have it connected via HDMI s.meinem flat, very good image quality.
It has two USB inputs, s.einem I use a 1TB HDD s.den other input ggf a USB stick for a quick test.
VG Bidone
