Twin LNB with one cable s.einen HD S2 Technisat DigiCorder
Frage von Klaus Wagner: Juli 2020
Hello,
as already described in the subject:
Ichmöchte a receiver that has 2 inputs, s.einem Twin LNB ?. I have only one cable.
Is this possible?
Maybe with what restrictions?
Ich hab 'me the eye ausgekoogelt :-) but always find highly sophisticated solutions with quad LNBs and a highly Switching matrix. Can anyone here by chance a link that explains where is?
Many greetings Klaus
Antwort von Bernd Nomi:
Klaus Wagner wrote: > Hello, > > As already described in the subject: > > Ichmöchte a receiver that has 2 inputs, s.einem Twin LNB >?. I have only one cable. > > Is this possible? No, each receiver needs its own line. Even if it possible, both with a run, you can take advantage TWIN receiver is not an advantage because it is always both either horizontal or vertical only able to receive broadcast channels.
> I've got me eyes ausgekoogelt :-) but always find > Highly complex solutions with quad LNBs and a highly > Switching matrix. Can anyone here by chance a link that explains where is?
Multiple LNBs are anything but complicated, with switching matrix is which is more expensive. Simple unscrew LNB, a good, multi - LNB mount, cable lay-fertich.
-- ><(((°> ><(((*<><(((°> ><(((*< If the environment is a bank, it would have saved it long ago www.foodwatch.dewww.regenwald.org
Antwort von Klaus Wagner:
Hello Bernd,
"Bernd Nomi" wrote in news post Re: Twin LNB with one cable s.einen HD S2 Technisat DigiCorder # # # > Klaus Wagner wrote: >> Hello, >> >> As already described in the subject: >> >> Ichmöchte a receiver that has 2 inputs, s.einem Twin LNB >>?. I have only one cable. >> >> Is this possible? > No, each receiver needs its own line. Even if it is possible > Is, both with a run can the benefits of a TWIN > Receiver does not exploit because it is always either both horizontal > Vertical or only able to receive broadcast channels. > >> I've got me eyes ausgekoogelt :-) but always find >> Highly complex solutions with quad LNBs and a highly >> Switching matrix. Can anyone here by chance a link that explains where is? > > Multi-LNBs are anything but complicated, with the switching matrix is > Is more expensive. Simple unscrew LNB, a good, multi-LNB > Mount
That would be no problem
> Line-fertich embarrassed.
And in my case is not technically feasible.
Greeting Klaus
---
www.wagner-mem.de
Antwort von Bernd Nomi:
Klaus Wagner wrote:
>> Pipe-laying fertich. > > And in my case is not technically feasible.
Hello then you can use the Twin-receiver does not exploit. There is no other Solution
Antwort von Helmut Schulte:
Klaus Wagner wrote:
> Ichmöchte a receiver that has 2 inputs, s.einem Twin LNB >?. I have only one cable. > > Is this possible?
I do not know whether it dirhilft, have little idea, but just in furnished me the following:
From the roof, a pipe, which hangs off LNB as I do not know. When I hang a cable s.dem a Topfield TF4000 PVR Pros * * with hard drive on it, has twin tuners.
- Tuner-1 by looping with tuner-2 connected - Cable s.Tuner -1 - Data of on-1 tuner tuner-2 copied
I can now, for example * The first record * and * look * ZDF, Any other Transmitter combination synonymous, when the signals of a transponder to and in the same IF level.
-- Greetings Helmut
Antwort von Klaus Wagner:
"Helmut Schulte" wrote in news post Re: Twin LNB with one cable s.einen HD S2 Technisat DigiCorder # # # > Klaus Wagner wrote: > >> Ichmöchte a receiver that has 2 inputs, s.einem Twin LNB >>?. I have only one cable. >> >> Is this possible? > > I do not know whether it dirhilft, have little idea, but just in > I set up the following: > > From the roof, a pipe, which hangs off LNB as I do not know. > When I hang a cable s.dem a Topfield TF4000 PVR Pros * * with > Hard drive on it, has twin tuners. > > - Tuner-1 by looping with tuner-2 connected > - Cable s.Tuner -1 > - Data of on-1 tuner tuner-2 copied > > I can now, for example * The first record * and * look * ZDF, Any other > Synonymous transmitter combination, if the signals of a transponder to > And in the same IF level.
Sounds logical, transmitter of the same polarization should then receive be. > > -- > Greetings Helmut
Greeting Klaus
---
www.wagner-mem.de
Antwort von Bernd Nomi:
Klaus Wagner wrote:
> Sounds logical, transmitter of the same polarization should then receive > Be.
Jau and exactly what makes a twin receiver to joke
Antwort von Wolfgang Ottenweller:
Hello,
Bernd Nomi wrote: > Klaus Wagner wrote: > >> Sounds logical, transmitter of the same polarization should then receive >> Be. > > Jau and exactly what makes a twin receiver to joke
why? One can thus significantly more channels than with use of combinations _einem_ tuner. With _einem_ tuner, you can (if the receiver allows) several transmitters _eines_ transponder simultaneously record with _zwei_ Tuners can _zweier_ Channel Transponder combine if they are contained in the same group (H / V _und_ high / low identical) lie.
In the current transponders (which of course may change) cover a large part of the German station in the same group.
Gruß, Wolfgang
Antwort von Wilfried Anders:
Klaus Wagner wrote: > Hello, > > As already described in the subject: > > Ichmöchte a receiver that has 2 inputs, s.einem Twin LNB >?. I have only one cable. > > Is this possible?
If you are lucky is that, for instance, with such a Stacker / Destacker like this:
http://www.reichelt.de/?;ARTICLE€375
> Maybe with what restrictions? > [...]
The signal of the second LNB is with his intermediate frequency in the frequency range above the upper end of the ZF-frame of the first LNB postponed. The cable must then signals with frequencies up to 4GHz , while not normally transmit signals over 2GHz be. The damping as an LNB IF signal on the cable learns is a function of frequency, higher frequencies are more damped than low, according to you have a good chance in the the range of 2-4GHz shifted signals of the second of the LNBs s.Ende Cable no longer enough for the satellite receiver arrives.
If you are lucky and your coaxial cable is capable of it not too long synonymous and the connection boxes do not cause problems, then it maybe. The manufacturer claims its Stacker / Destacker works up to 30m cable length, more than a rule of thumb is not. I it would be just the thing to try and return if necessary.
Gruß Willi
Antwort von Bernd Nomi:
Wolfgang Ottendorf Weller wrote: > Hello, > > Bernd Nomi wrote: >> Klaus Wagner wrote: >> >>> Sounds logical, transmitter of the same polarization should then receive >>> Be. >> >> Jau and exactly what makes a twin receiver to joke > > Why? One can thus significantly more channels than with use of combinations > _einem_ Tuner.
jaja and a car in which a wheel is still missing as a better Bicycle synonymous when only curves in one direction can drive;)
Antwort von Thomas Einzel:
Wolfgang Ottendorf Weller wrote s.21.06.2009 00:10: > Hello, > > Bernd Nomi wrote: >> Klaus Wagner wrote: >> >>> Sounds logical, transmitter of the same polarization should then be >>> Be received. >> >> Jau and exactly what makes a twin receiver to joke > > Why? One can thus significantly more channels than with use of combinations > _einem_ Tuner. With _einem_ tuner, you can (if the receiver allows) > More _eines_ transponder transmitter simultaneously record with _zwei_ > Tuner transmitter, you can combine _zweier_ transponder, provided in this > Of the same group (H / V _und_ high / low identical) lie.
Yes, if the twin receiver with a connection cable with two s.einer Tuners in the configuration permits, the relative comfortable, clear and komplikationsarm. I've a time long s.den 2 satellite connections s.meinem an AV rack and a dbox2 Humax PDR9700 parallel, there remained for only a Humax Line. True, he set the example, blinded by a HDD Recording is currently not possible channels through ausgrauen "from the menu.
It is, however, with the above restrictions. Without configuring the Twin receivers on a Satleitung IMO but it is actually quite "pointless", especially if by a switch to the other Polarization (or, IF level), the recording could be corrupt.
Thomas
Antwort von Wolfgang Hauser:
Klaus Wagner wrote:
>> Pipe-laying fertich. > > And in my case is not technically feasible.
Cable is not synonymous? There are specially designed for narrow Installation thin twin cable.
Antwort von Gerd Schweizer:
Klaus Wagner wrote: > > Ichmöchte a receiver that has 2 inputs, s.einem Twin LNB >?. I have only one cable. > > Is this possible? > With the additions is that, Klaus. With the Set of Johannson. Need but s.der side dish a power supply. In the LNB under very Faq below, it is briefly described. http://www.techno-com.de/shop/start.php?satanlagen_komplett_sat-_einkabelsysteme_johansson_konverter.php -- Liebe Grüße, Gerd FAQ satellite, PC Tips, Cats, Mopped, Garden, DIY: http://www.satgerd.de/
Antwort von Klaus Wagner:
Hello,
thank you for all the answers and hints. The version of the Stacker with Gerd De-Stacker and would be at least worth a test.
Many greetings Klaus
---
www.wagner-mem.de
Antwort von Thomas Einzel:
Gerd Schweizer s.21.06.2009 14:43 wrote: > Klaus Wagner wrote: >> >> Ichmöchte a receiver that has 2 inputs, s.einem Twin LNB >>?. I have only one cable. >> >> Is this possible? >> > With the additions is that, Klaus. With the Set of Johannson. Need but > S.der bowl side power supply. In the LNB under very Faq > Below, it is briefly described. > http://www.techno-com.de/shop/start.php?satanlagen_komplett_sat-_einkabelsysteme_johansson_konverter.php
Could you please indicate your experience with cable type and length of as a response to post in this thread?
Reinhartshausen arithmetically adjust the bandwidth, but well with 3.5 GHz normal satellite cable (which is not easy for you to exchange it, otherwise everything would be simple) could be sporty - there would be me Experience technically interested.
Thomas
Antwort von Klaus Wagner:
Hello Thomas,
"Thomas Special" wrote in news post news: h1m1oj $ 1E2 $ 03 $ 1@news.t-online.com ... > Gerd Schweizer s.21.06.2009 14:43 wrote: >> Klaus Wagner wrote: >>> >>> Ichmöchte a receiver that has 2 inputs, s.einem Twin LNB >>>?. I have only one cable. >>> >>> Is this possible? >>> >> With the additions is that, Klaus. With the Set of Johannson. Need but >> S.der bowl side power supply. In the FAQ at the bottom LNB >> It is described briefly. >> http://www.techno-com.de/shop/start.php?satanlagen_komplett_sat-_einkabelsysteme_johansson_konverter.php > > "The signals are stored Frequenzmäßig in a row." > > Inputs: 1x 5-2150 MHz 950-2150 MHz 1x > Outputs: 6-3550 MHz " > > Could you please indicate your experience with cable type and length of > As a reply in this thread to post?
That could be a few more months, but here earlier will. > > Reinhartshausen arithmetically adjust the bandwidth, but good 3.5 GHz with normal > Sat cable (which is not easy for you to exchange it, otherwise everything would be > Simple) could be sporty - since my experience would technically > Interested.
I think the 3 GHz is not soo difficult, I have ever a 30m cable in the absence of an F-coupling of soldered by further 5m extended. (Not this cable)
Greeting Klaus
---
www.wagner.mem.de
Antwort von Gerd Schweizer:
Individual Thomas wrote: >> http://www.techno-com.de/shop/start.php?satanlagen_komplett_sat-_einkabelsysteme_johansson_konverter.php > > > "The signals are stored Frequenzmäßig in a row." > > Inputs: 1x 5-2150 MHz 950-2150 MHz 1x > Outputs: 6-3550 MHz " > > Could you please indicate your experience with cable type and length of > As a reply in this thread to post? > Thomas, fortunately, I have no experience with the kit. Posted I have only because I had heard.
> "Thomas Special" wrote ... >> Outputs: 6-3550 MHz " >> >> Could you please indicate your experience with cable type and length of >> As a reply in this thread to post? ... >> Rein arithmetically adjust the bandwidth, but good 3.5 GHz with normal >> Sat cable (which is not easy for you to exchange it, otherwise everything would be >> Simple) could be sporty - since my experience would technically >> Interested. > > I think the 3 GHz is not soo difficult
it is synonymous not only to 3GHz, but a 3.55 Ghz, which are not peanuts
> I have ever > A 30m cable in the absence of an F-coupling of soldered by further 5m > Extended
With over 3.5 GHz or the "normal" 2.15 Ghz? I have two lines with several connectors> 40m (Hirschmann) and>> 50m (could even be> 60m his, of which about 50m underground cables) s.Switch, but only the synonymous High Volume usual to 2.15 Ghz. No problems, everything that is totally in the green Range.
I asked and asked only of interest to a feedback and with cable length.
Thomas
Antwort von Bernd Daene:
Gerd Schweizer wrote: > ... Need side dish but s.der a power supply.
In this way, must be set only Destacker s.die outlet he supplies the stacker then sat on the line: http://www.reichelt.de/?;ACTION=7;INDEX=0;FILENAMEñ00/Instructions-Stacker.pdf
(And the declared frequency range goes up to 3.85 GHz.)
Bernd
Antwort von Gerd Schweizer:
Bernd Daens wrote: > Gerd Schweizer wrote: >> ... Need side dish but s.der a power supply. > > In this way, must be set only Destacker s.die outlet > It provides the stacker then sat on the line: > http://www.reichelt.de/?;ACTION=7;INDEX=0;FILENAMEñ00/Instructions-Stacker.pdf > > > (And the declared frequency range goes up to 3.85 GHz.) > Thanks, Bernd, this is even considered. -- Liebe Grüße, Gerd FAQ satellite, PC Tips, Cats, Mopped, Garden, DIY: http://www.satgerd.de/
