Newsmeldung von slashCAM:Two new HDV camcorder of Sony - HDR-HC7E and HDR-HC5E of rudi - 8 Jan 2007 13:37:00 Already at the end of February will Sonyden HDR-HC1 and the HDR-HC3 with new models to replace:
The HDR-HC 7 for Euro 1499 has an optical Image Stabilization, Microphone and headphone jack and a 6-Mpix CMOS sensor (1 / 2, 9 inches) behind a Zeiss 10x Zoom Lens. New on the CMOS sensor is the xvColour technology, which clearly should produce more intense colors, because the sensor is a significantly larger color density. Compared to the sRGB color space will be almost 80 percent larger and nearly 100 percent of the natural color cover. To this, however, to see the display must be synonymous to the new xvYCC (eXtended Video YCC) color support, which today is still virtually no display can. Moreover, it remains to ask how these specific colors in the normal HDV-709-compatible color recorded. Finally, it is indeed a normal HDV camcorder.
To manually control promises Sonydie adjustment of sharpness, aperture, shutter speed and white balance on a typical wheel s.Lens.
Already for 1199 euros to get the HDR-HC5E only an optical stabilizer, and a 4 Mpix CMOS sensor with 1/3-Inch owns. Otherwise, the equipment seems to be similar. This has again Sonynun the best HDV camcorder on the market and through the first Manufacturer to clear 1,000 euros retail price threshold.
to news reporting
Antwort von ph_glitsch:
Is already Ok, if your camcorder is always cheaper or kleinder, but why would you HC7 of the size of her more like the HC1 can make (if not slightly larger) and with several rings or levers for manual Einstallungen so they Camera the "semi-professional 'field with it ....
And where did the HDD camcorder? "Uncompressed" HDV on a 120-GB Hard is better than the MPEG2 codec scheiss!
Antwort von Valentino:
And where did the HDD camcorder? "Uncompressed" HDV on a 120-GB Hard is better than the MPEG2 codec scheiss! Help has since once again someone is not properly infomiert. So HDV is MPEG2 and is certainly not the uncompressed and will not synonymous change.
At the DV standard is synonymous nobody came up with the idea of the MPEG2 but would be better.
Quite apart uncompressed HD would be synonymous not just with a hard drive aufzuzeichenen. This requires you already have an kompetntes RAID system. In addition this
contribution
So you have something in google or wiki or clever synonymous times Slashcam the search and do not use semi-spreading.
Antwort von ph_glitsch:
[quote = "Valentino"]
Help has since once again someone is not properly infomiert. So HDV is MPEG2 and is certainly not the uncompressed and will not synonymous change.
At the DV standard is synonymous nobody came up with the idea of the MPEG2 but would be better.
Quite apart uncompressed HD would be synonymous not just with a hard drive aufzuzeichenen. In previous PAL was yes to AVI with the DV codec recorded ... (which is practically not compressed, and not in the MPEG2 format) ... whether to HDD or tape aufnimmst should play no role (everything is digital)
And yet one hears repeatedly that the MPEG2 compression for HDV is poor and at faster movements quickly blocks appear.
-> I wanted to actually enable this comment
Antwort von Bernd E.:
DV codec ... which is practically non-compressed DV is compressed, and not just low - on the one hand due to the sampling rate of 4:2:0 (for PAL) and then secondly by the digital compression factor 5:1. Sun remains of about 27 MB per second, only one data set of 3.6 MB / s left.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von deepcode:
could agree to be nice - but beware with the "2 Lux Rating:
"... The Auto Slow Shutter function (Automatic adjusting shutter speed: 1 / 25 ~ 1 / 215 sec) even in the darkness makes for acceptable photographs: they reduce the required minimum brightness of five to two Lux"
http://www.sony.de/view/View.action?section=de_DE_Press&pressrelease=1168443951714&site=odw_de_DE&page=PressReleaseDetail
if I understand correctly, the cam reaches the 2 lux sensitivity by a 1 / 25 shutter and is thus in this area for film work useless, since movements in 1 / 25 total blur and smear. Schade eigentlich.
