USB 3.0 compatibility issues today?Of rudi - 3 Jun 2008 13:15:00 Those who have not yet heard: USB 3.0 is just around the corner and the specifications are being festgeklopft: 4.8 Gbit / s maximum transfer rate (by two additional stripping in the "Super Speed" mode) and an optional fiber-optic connections to promise just for video editors fast memory access. With about 500MB / s is likely synonymous FullHD successor or uncompressed 4K files to grips with his. A backward compatibility with USB 1.1 and 2.0 is guaranteed, but it could be the connection of USB 3.0 devices to a significant incompatibilities come. At least if one believes the Inquirer, which claims that Intel, the specification does not give out before it totally finished. Now, however, seem to some companies already have access to the specs on, while a direct Intel competitor will have to wait. And it may happen that these companies now with their own USB 3.0 standard to send into the race in order to "Introduction" is not without USB 3.0 features to it. And this should be two (at least partially) incompatible USB 3.0-versions to follow. With the usual negative consequences for the customer.
This is a brand-current contribution .... Pat Gelsinger after the system in September last year, not only presented, but synonymous during his key note presentation has since February 2007 and the first plots on CSI is available on the Internet .... and discussed. As I said, "latest" post ....
Antwort von Markus:
"WoWu" wrote:
... in September last year ...
... was already synonymous of Slashcam via USB 3.0 reported.
Antwort von cutty:
I wonder what the whole. It has the clear (because far less demanding processor load) IEE 1394/800.
Antwort von WoWu:
Jau, but FireWire is then of Apple as an industry standard has been released and thus free from licensing (IEEE1394) .... USB to try to earn all with ....
Antwort von Bernd E.:
"WoWu" wrote:
FireWire is ... ... ... royalty free USB with any attempt to earn ...
I have always thought that it was exactly the opposite situation: The use of Firewire royalties should s.Apple and Sonyentrichtet, while the USB-free license to get it? Therefore, the trend towards USB in any case obvious to explain.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von WoWu:
Actually yes FW was not for external use but provided as an internal machine and buss so synonymous of the IEEE defined. I'm not clear on what the IEEE Sonywith to do, because of Apple is really alone and developed so synonymous in the first PowerMac internal models have been used. It may be that Sony Of these "open source" of IEEE and has plucked one of the 77 minutes it has implemented. ? In any case, the IEEE is "Member benefits"-oriented ... may now be that a "non-member" to pay what ... I do not know. I can just not imagine that Intel and NEC anything available for free .... then it would be submitting it to the IEEE is an easy task. But USB3 is synonymous not primarily as a substitute for FW planned, but much more as an interface in the Gbit range ....
Antwort von Bernd E.:
"WoWu" wrote:
... now I'm not clear on what the IEEE Sonywith to do ... I just can not imagine that Intel ... anything for free, the ...
More than this brief information (in the fourth paragraph of the article): www.heise.de/newsticker/Marktforscher-nennt-FireWire-Nischentechnik--/meldung/91878 I think at the moment, unfortunately, not synonymous.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von WoWu:
Many thanks for the contribution, Bernd, interesting. I am trying times PatCom about what to get out ... nor am I member. The thing with Intel, it is clear on each CPU can be found in a variety of peripheral interfaces ... at Intel and then probably the USB ... but since then you pay the price the CPU Fee. It is interesting just how it is in non-Intel products behave. But again, thank you for the contribution.
Antwort von Quadruplex:
"Bernd E." wrote:
I have always thought that it was exactly the opposite is the case
This is synonymous my knowledge. Since FireWire has been there for 13 years, likes the meantime, however, times have changed.
"Cutty" wrote:
I wonder what the whole. It has the clear (because far less demanding processor load) IEE 1394/800.
Between 800 Mps and 5 Gbps is probably a significant difference. However, it is synonymous with the fire wire possible, appropriate speeds to be achieved, if one wants.
For the origin theme since there are still a somewhat more detailed reporting to Heise.
Antwort von DWUA:
To cheer something more OT-ypical.
There will be a FW cable (new addition) is used, since the Appearance of the first iMac (the transparent, small, portable "Television") is still flawless services. As it is still far no USB port on the Front at the time of the wins (95/98) - Housing has been made. There were so floppy slots. If you are not forgotten in the discussion ...
One thing is for sure: Canon FS 10/11/100 etc. may IEEE neither with nor with USB 3.
