Apparently too much for my comprehension ... have the following question:
What brings the now-complete acquisition of the best-quality digitization of VHS tapes or S-VHS cassette apart?
Have read many who thought that a TV card is'toll, others are on CANOPUS ADVC 55 and following (link can be viewed and I've seen, great and extensive ...) to write a little different, the converters are not synonymous dolle . Still others recommend camcorder?!
Now I stand here helpless and frag's go on it: What should I do if begrentzte costs play a role, but the picture-and sound quality is crucial and should be up to?
is grateful for your answers: Sandman
Antwort von Stefan:
Quote:
What brings the now-complete acquisition of the best-quality digitization of VHS tapes or S-VHS cassette apart?
It can make from a pro to professional equipment.
SCNR The fat Stefan
Antwort von brothermikee:
"Sandman" wrote:
Love slashCAM,
Now I stand here helpless and frag's go on it: What should I do if begrentzte costs play a role, but the picture-and sound quality is crucial and should be up to?
is grateful for your answers: Sandman
The Canopus ADVC 300 of this is extra - about 400 euros. Much more can I boost s.Qualität only with manual labor.
Jo where you at in the Comparison of current digital DVDs, probably can hardly achieve a truly breathtaking quality.
What is this exactly?
Antwort von Sandman:
"Stefan" wrote:
Quote:
What brings the now-complete acquisition of the best-quality digitization of VHS tapes or S-VHS cassette apart?
It can make from a pro to professional equipment.
SCNR The fat Stefan
@ Stefan: Yes, maybe, with so here is exactly this question. What does the Profiequitment in your eyes?
ADVC 300, I've now discovered (Thanks s.Leini), should be good.
The question is: What did it produce more for equipment, a quality that is look good. 'll Take time, it's a high-quality video player (but what strikes me ???), but more than a "little software" for a non-synonymous, right??!
@ LuFaHa "Jo, where you at in the Comparison of current digital DVDs, probably can hardly achieve a truly breathtaking quality. "
What does that mean? If you have no chance, only approximately synonymous s.The quality of digital heranzukommen DVD's, or is it already, but the effort is disproportionate??
What exactly is it in fact is that I have some friends who have VHS tapes and liked them as a DVD, "reworked" respectively. want to have digitized. And who's to do, because he has the time? "I!
So I thought I'd inform me once before, as it gets before I buy nen pile of stuff that does not bring the desired results after ...
Furthermore grateful for answers
Sandman
Antwort von brothermikee:
Hello,
basically I would just say you'll get from a VHS never a quality like a DVD purchase. Where is intended to benefit the quality, can conjure up ninth. But we can compensate for the Überspielverluste and remove such noise. Dropouts smooth stabilize Picture and put colors cope. Optimally wirds better than the original but never as good as a bad purchase DVD. I doubt synonymous views very strongly that your friend will have Astreines VHS material. In a good SVHS copy You could possibly create s.ein come Orignal DVD, provided the original is super.
mfg
Leini
Antwort von StefanS:
"Sandman" wrote:
What does that mean? If you have no chance, only approximately synonymous s.The quality of digital heranzukommen DVD's, or is it already, but the effort is disproportionate?? Sandman
Hello Sandman,
just imagine a video playing as a glass of beer. Now you drink a tiny sip and fill to the mark again with water. Now you have transferred to film / video, the quality of a DVD purchase of a Hollywood production. Well you're drinking a sip again and then again to fill up to the mark with water. Now you have the quality that emit the broadcasters. Well you're drinking a sip again and then again to fill up to the mark with water. Now you have the quality that can reflect your own TV channel. Well you're drinking a sip again and then again to fill up to the mark with water. Now you have the quality has taken up with the your VHS recorder. Well you're drinking a sip again and then again to fill up to the mark with water. Well you're drinking a sip again and then again to fill up to the mark with water. Now you have the quality of your VHS recorder with reproducing the aged videotape. Well you're drinking a sip again and then again to fill up to the mark with water. Now you have the quality with which can be digitized.
And do not tell me that You taste no difference between the fresh draft beer, and the seventh dilution.
What I want to tell you. VHS video in all formats today s.Markt located next to the analog antenna signal the worst. By digitize that is no longer better, tastes genauo little as a beer by dilution with water better.
What matters in the Digitalis of old VHS videos arrive, is simple and poignant today s.den s.Markt located formats mitigation measure.
This damage limitation rather poorly handled a device with composite input and output MPEG2 via USB. Similar graphics are bad cards with video in and TV cards.
In our homes, you drive with one s.besten Canopus converter, which outputs a DV-AVI via firewire. Similarly well with other converters manufacturer, or a modern video camera via firewire also spend a DV-AVI.
How you can save a little more, as the player is using an S-VHS VCR and a corresponding S-video cable, synonymous if you only have VHS tapes. Reason: The signal from the VCR is simply better than composite.
Anything beyond that can only be a "professional" with "professional equipment" better, which is as much more expensive, a much better and degraded signal, etc. generated
Greeting Stefan
PS: If you drink beer, try it with white wine, red wine, soup or or
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
Hello all of you.
There's actually a company in America that can make a VHS from a really good video, in DVD quality. This is a company that actually are working with space for NASA and improve anything in particular. In criminal cases, this company has improved already extremely pixelated video recordings so that you could see face book. Since then it costs ¬ 1 seconds film 2000, bears no relationship, I just want to say that it is possible to make something like this too!
Otherwise, I digitize video to DVD on my camcorder and evt allow an improvement in the PC running over it. I maintain that one hardly recognizes a distinction between video and digitized video. But: we recognize the distinction between DVD and video, that's for sure! (Well, of course, synonymous between DVD and digitized video)
Must be because the quality as good as DVD? I mean, the videos but for years habens synonymous done, right? And if the pros can not even rausholen much more, why then do you?
Love Greetings Constantin
Antwort von Markus:
Hello "Sandman"
Canopus ADVC-300 I have now called synonymous, when a very good quality to be achieved during digitizing. I wish to highlight here synonymous, the locked audio, so this does not lead to drift between Picture and Sound.
To play a high quality SVHS or VHS recorder should be used, because what good is an ADVC-300, if he needs to iron out weaknesses, primarily the reproduction of a cheap recorder?
See synonymous: FireWire FAQ">1. (c) Why do not capture using graphics card, TV card or video grabber?
Or is it possible to make (
Antwort von Rob65:
Hello Sandmann
Also of use to me on the Recommendation to the Canopus ADVC300. In my opinion, unbeatable price / performance ratio.
But it remains the most important player, the VCR. Very good is the Panasonic NV-FS88 and the NV-FS200. Both devices from the mid-90s, but are definitely present NOT better. Functioning and expertly maintained equipment there is always again on eBay for under $ 200. If you yourself are familiar with VCR's, you procure a defective, non verbastelten. There's the cost under 50 euros and usually only a handful of capacitors are replaced. (another 5-10 EURO)
