Frage von sawdust:Hey,
sorry for the funny person but I did not know how better ichs brief can! ;)
So, I have a value (for example, position) with an expression (for example, Wiggle) influence, but still have the possibility to change this value manually keyframe. Is this possible? The only way I stopped about a second level to create, without expression, and of her only to the opacity keyframes.
Is this the only option?
Thank you
Antwort von Mylenium:
Hey,
sorry for the funny person but I did not know how better ichs brief can! ;)
So, I have a value (for example, position) with an expression (for example, Wiggle) influence, but still have the possibility to change this value manually keyframe. Is this possible? The only way I stopped about a second level to create, without expression, and of her only to the opacity keyframes.
Is this the only option?
Thank you Why willste's difficult to make thee?
Wiggle () always works relative to the value of the keyframe or the static property value. In that case you can without any further action immediately. Otherwise, a general
value as a general wildcard. Soll's specific, you give the property holding the name. Is even more, but you do not want to annoy. Write simple
value + wiggle (), which is 100% secure.
Mylenium
Antwort von mdp:
ok sure! thanks you.
I think because fehte me a little basic know-how of expression! ;)