Frage von Beatfabrikant:
Hi Leutz!
Post programs are well known porcine expensive. Now there is the possibility of such Programs from the Usenet LEGAL to download. And for little money (10-20 euros per month).
What say you about this. Is it really 100 times cheaper than the progs to buy or what do you think?
thx beat fabrikant
Antwort von daniela_:
Well that's great but then mach das But do not forget you at Adobe and co. to register with and address that. viel spaß!
Antwort von daniela_:
I believe that the manufacturer wanted to beat just s.Sonntag the Troll raushängen leave.
Matthias
Antwort von StefanS:
A pirated copy can not be legal, that they take over the donkey's about Usenet is pursued.
Please do me the favor and sign up anywhere with your name correctly, so you the Abmahnanwälte post synonymous correctly can deliver.
Greeting
Stefan
Antwort von christoph 12574:
That it is legal to download software lizenspflichtige is news to me no preference whether the file or using Usenet happening.
Of which I prefer to let my finger off nicely!
If I only have like s.so provider Usenext think that will give me very bad, what to do in my eyes, but the fraud is synonymous to a different theme.
What would interest me but why do you think it is actually legally chargeable Programs free download on usenet?
And then are cracked or how does the install and then register?
Antwort von Beatfabrikant:
Well then I'm not quite synonymous convincing them that it is legal (has anyone here ne ahnung Page of the law of such matters?)
I can only say from other Erfahungsberichten that until now no legal difficulties with the Usenet was, or because someone knows what else?
Antwort von StefanS:
The question here is behind it is this:
The Usenet providers promise anonymity that the ass and they no longer offer Knsorten (can / want)
So we turn to Usenet's in the hope that since our illegal activities further.
Any other representation - such as: there are legal problems with the Usenet - is yet again only the question: "Will I be caught in Usenet?"
Violation of the law remains the law
I deliberately do not say that wrong is wrong.
And so is this discussion for me to end.
Greeting
Stefan
Antwort von daniela_:
Well then I'm not quite synonymous convincing them that it is legal (has anyone here ne ahnung Page of the law of such matters?)
I can only say from other Erfahungsberichten that until now no legal difficulties with the Usenet was, or because someone knows what else? Herrjeh - the question was really serious ...
Then quite simple for you: You shall pay me $ 20 and I allow you to s.sofort always with red lights on the ride. If the police stop you, then simply tell where a nice greeting of me and that I'm going to have the permits.
Matthias
Antwort von Beatfabrikant:
Where the hell I said that I do something synonymous? Huhhh?
I see about this topic you can not speak without someone to make accusations. I just wanted to be an objective Meinung.Nicht more and no less. And I apologize synonymous this forum with such a dirty subject to charge. Will never happen again synonymous
No more answers erwünscht.Danke, close, conclusion.
Antwort von daniela_:
No more answers erwünscht.Danke, close, conclusion. That is now not synonymous. You can not start a thread and then someday say that you do not want to have more answers, because they do not like the content you have. So I think the course you can, but it helps you nothing. None of you will be deterred from further comment. But I hope that the whole thread will be deleted due to uselessness.
On Usenet you have to say "Kathinkas Law": "A question in the Usenet does not provide the answers relating to who we want to hear." Most will still add to the sentence: "You have lost". A beautiful tradition that we are synonymous in a forum like this can be transferred.
Matthias
Antwort von Bernd E.:
Well then I'm not quite synonymous convincing them that it is legal Beautifully worded s.sofort ;-) You can even be convinced that it is illegal, because it is.
Gruß Bernd E.
