Frage von Fuxsberger:
Hi,
actually, the headline said already of their own. I am planning a shoot for a music video that will be rotated on the Canon 5D Mark II is to us but only a lens ... And while the standard zoom lens Canon EF 24-105mm f4.0 L IS USM is available!
I myself have not yet with the 5d MarkII rotated and therefore know whether the last s.Optiken ... or whether to rent or possibly to what?
The video will look like in the end so that there are many long shots but synonymous many close-ups of people will be ... where then with the depth of focus should be played ...
Maybe you could help me and tell me if indeed something and if so, what optics organ isere I should do?
Would be grateful for any tip ...
Thank you ever ...
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Gude
Tough question
if you find a lender I would to either Canon EF or Nikon AIs FB (fixed focal length) look
24-135 mm Covering
All by possibillity so between f1.2 to f2.8
So you can be happy.
f4 zoom your lens to be less suitable.
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von Fuxsberger:
and is synonymous really necessary?
I have my rent in the glasses now so synonymous non-grad soooo cheap ...
Antwort von majaprinz:
If you want to have more favorable: with the Canon 24-70/2.8 I mainly work: with open aperture has little depth of field, but still quite flexible. If you still find a 100/2.0 and a 17-40/4 mm (Wide Angle with very little depth of field is difficult, then you already s.24mm the other Lens ...), you should get along already.
Depending on the brightness / location you should consider synonymous s.ND filter!
Antwort von Fuxsberger:
So I'm looking for right now a little bit and found the following glasses ...
1x EF zoom 4,0 / 17-40mm L USM
1x EF zoom 2,8 / 24-70mm L USM
1x EF 2,0 / 100mm USM
The three would cost per day 53 ¬ which I think would be perfectly fine!
This would, however, get good quality of the pictures will you? So would be suitable for the rotation?
The recordings are held in a white scarf ... So is anything but light based !!!!!
Antwort von B.DeKid:
How big is the because the Loctation so if you do not want to cropping and enough space then you will be happy with not just f4
Antwort von Fuxsberger:
the groove width of 8m has ne ...
s exempt what? how do you mean?
Antwort von B.DeKid:
..... where then with the depth of focus should be played ...
So you think yes then Crop / Shallow Depth of Field or blurred background
Here you can http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html times you work out a sharpness range.
And then come quickly to the results, the f4 is not that the charm.
And more important than the width of the area more depth is the whole room!
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von Fuxsberger:
ahhh, you mean okay ....
ehm ... yes So the space has deep backward ne of no plan so about 10-15 meters ..
What would be better suited??
Antwort von soan:
I (personally) think the f4 s.Vollformat definitely enough to brag look away. All that lies underneath is moving with Camera and without exercise (which I at the questioner even partially suspect) to compensate for difficult.
I find F 1.4 synonymous quite great, but you should not overdo synonymous.
Antwort von Fuxsberger:
I do not quite understand ... why the glasses are more intense because more difficult to use?
Antwort von soan:
Are more difficult to use them, but it is very difficult to open Aperture to keep the focus.
You is at maximum aperture (eg 1.4) a very small focal plane, in Aperture, 4 eg the greater one and does not slip so easily into the blur.
Antwort von Fuxsberger:
yes I never imagined the synonymous thought !!!!!!!
why are so danna uch that while you have 2.0 or containing 4 ... have choice then ...
Antwort von Mink:
For DV-kameraverleih.de there is a Nikon kit with adapter for 16 ¬ .... that's probably best .... Before You turn ... borg you the parts and practice! do not seem particularly to have the plan .... You need to change this.
Antwort von Fuxsberger:
where is the since an adapter is available at?
Antwort von Mink:
The adapter with you and give is the give the 5D the 24-105 L f4 here ... for 19 ¬.
Antwort von Fuxsberger:
yes I say yes .... I wuuste the net the only synonymous n adapter to have the canon connection ... because there is nowhere?
Antwort von Mink:
They have a lot of stuff that is nowhere .... ask around for .... (But enough for now .... pay me even the non-;)
Antwort von Fuxsberger:
being so dependent of the suitcase with the fixed focal length of your statement by then is almost the hardest?
which are all completely bright ...
Antwort von Mink:
What do you want?
Antwort von majaprinz:
I recommend strongly once the camera with the 24-105 at least try out without time pressure, and look up the basics beforehand, the effect of the aperture, the distance to the object and the focal on the Picture and in particular on the depth of field.
What do you want to achieve eigenlich with the DSLR? The background is beautiful it will certainly not be resolved, which is white in color.
Antwort von Fuxsberger:
which in any case .... the cam is a few days before shooting on location already !!!!! that is so clear ....
It is primarily and really impress the image and the quality of the pictures of the dslr's ...
Antwort von rainermann:
It is primarily and really impress the image and the quality of the pictures of the dslr's ... I am saving to ne Red Epic.
No idea what I want with so many pixels, but ... then make my movies look like Spiderman 4th
Because:
"A good camera makes a good movie."
(Oh dear)
(Duck and away!)
Antwort von Fuxsberger:
jaja you flipping idiot standing around!! synonymous because the the statement is that I've made ...
Antwort von rainermann:
I just let the other go first ... ;-)
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Dim man can always ;-)
Therefore, the lenses may have only synonymous like f1.4.
But somehow I have the feeling that you synonymous you make it easy to imagine NEN bissel ;-))
Why do not you seek their new skills to photography and doing only Directing?
I find work in a team's worth all the time.
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von majaprinz:
The beautiful picture of a DSLR is defined mainly by the fact that you can use, among others Lenses with relatively long focal length and fairly open aperture (.. and by the brilliant wide-angle capability). If you then really use this with an open aperture (which requires a well-lit studio a proper density filter), then get out a picture, the focus range is very small.
Looks cool off, but in your case, two serious drawbacks:
1. You turn a music video. At a distance of one meter, we say to the musicians of the Focus range is the 100/2.0 now be within of a few centimeters. As you probably know, that would be even less with longer Focal. Now move our friend, and what happened? Nothing is more sharp. Not the foreground not the background.
If you want this effect, that a musician in the pure sharpness and rauszappelt, ok. If you will not have - then you need a way to stay in focus. You can do s.Lens, or more comfortable with a focus device. And you do this exercise.
2. You will not see much of the low field: This is because you have a white single-colored background, where there is nothing to resolve it with blur. Well, something will have to see blur when hopping around your musicians are synonymous to be rarely sharp.
You should be synonymous, that your musicians wear any clothing with small samples, since results in a moire pattern.
Antwort von majaprinz:
Oh yes, Wide Angle: Is enjoying synonymous with prudence, a 17mm are distorted at every Optics (ok, maybe not with Zeiss, I have not tried ...).
