Frage von Ramsi:
Hello Forum Friends,
did before, my old Hi8 tapes to digitizer. Also lots Normal8 and Super8 films must still be placed on video (which should then be equal to MiniDV available). After processing s.PC.
Have in this forum of you learned a lot and is now on the eve of the decision, Canopus
ADVC110 or
ADVC300 to buy and need some decision criteria. In principle ADVC110 would suffice.
In
www.Digitalschnitt.de The device is essential ... to recommend ... if you analog material, but somewhat critical (noisy, distorted, unstable, alienated), in accordance with best quality DV "rescue" will. It offers the ADVC-300 synonymous possible ... a different adjustment Bildverbesserer (noise) and settings (like brightness / contrast) to be.
What can the editing software of these tasks it synonymous?
I think that the Hi8 tapes to be easily and a ADVC110 enough.
The MiniDV tapes as well as the ever-synonymous converted N8 and S8 can I still not what I expected and whether a ADVC300 would be advisable.
Thanks in advance
Ramsi
Antwort von Markus:
What can the editing software of these tasks it synonymous? Hello,
a video editing program can be grossly wrong and s.Jitter brightness values no longer change, since the images are already digitized. Especially jitter can only recognize and video s.anlogen thereon.
On the other hand, you can (usually only with plug-ins, that is not directly synonymous with an editing software) nor synonymous subsequently minimize the image noise. A subsequent correction of this kind would have a very long time to render.
The MiniDV tapes as well as the ever-synonymous converted N8 and S8 can I still not what I expected Other .. If you (as owner of the film) does not know how then should we know?
zum Bild A good service is the film digitizer is so that no further steps are needed to improve. Particularly MiniDV is digital already and no A / D converter would be needed to view the recordings on a computer to transfer.
The same topic:
Purchase Canopus (ADVC-110 or ADVC-300?)
Antwort von Ramsi:
Thanks Mark for the promt reply
synonymous, I would like your valuable contributions commendable. Thank you for that.
Well, I think that the ADVC110 is sufficient. The additional options are available for the ADVC300 analog Hi8 tapes very likely not necessary as the quality of the images is good (camcorder SonyTR3100, was once 10 years ago "Test Winner").
At the N8 and S8-shooting is the most critical "interface" - since you have the right, of course, his conversion to MiniDV. Then go directly into the PC.
Now that the benefit of the ADVC110 to ADVC55 only the image control is to see what the converters are played from the AV signal does, but without any influence, I can see is only one benefit: When it looks good, run. If not, abort, and search reasons.
You see it as synonymous or are there other applications for the digital-analog-direction, which I still hidden?
Greeting
Ramsi
Antwort von Markus K.:
Synonymous, especially since you should not go unmentioned that the ADVC-300 still has several bugs, among others, the concern TBC;).
Antwort von Markus:
Now that the benefit of the ADVC110 to ADVC55 only the image control is to see what the converters are played from the AV signal does, but without any influence, I can see is only one benefit: ... Actually, we see no difference between the video signal directly from the recorder and the video from the ADVC-110. When digitization process, you need to get no picture control
after digitization, since no additional devices (analog Page) anyway no interference is possible.
... there are other use cases for the digital-analog-direction, which I still hidden? 1. If you cut a video, you need a suitable image control. The preview window on your computer monitor displays the image you are content, but leaves no proper assessment (here: brightness, contrast, color, interlace flicker, overscan, etc.). With an ADVC-110 s.Firewireanschluss your computer can you imagine the picture (depending on the editing program) synonymous to a television or video monitor output.
2. It is increasingly rare, but if someone has a VHS video copy of your wishes, you can select the timeline and play the movie with a connected analog recorder record.
Synonymous, especially since you should not go unmentioned that the ADVC-300 still has several bugs, among others, the concern TBC;). Please do more of the times.
I have (since two years!) Regularly ADVC-300 in use and has so far no jokes allowed, on a video monitor, a waveform or when the pulses cross would have been visible. On the contrary: The device and the TBC synonymous afford really good job.
BTW: There was some time ago times a firmware update (see Annex - only for registered users) that you download and on his ADVC-300 can install. Whether it has to do with it?
Antwort von Ramsi:
Hi Markus,
Thank you for the very useful information. Precisely this understanding of the processes and their interrelationships, I am missing because I have not worked.
Thus, for me to note that the ADVC-110 universal and more useful than the ADVC-55 is.
I think in this context, synonymous to a monitor with built-in TV tuner would be very handy, because you do not create an additional television in the "cutting table" for review needs. Have the Samsung SyncMaster 2032MW in sight.
Greeting
Ramsi
Antwort von Markus (unangemeldet):
... that a monitor with built-in TV tuner would be very handy [...] Have the Samsung SyncMaster 2032MW in sight. It was true that would be responsible for assessing the picture but not as optimal.
See:
Video recordings s.Computermonitor not look good _________________
Sincerely,
Markus
Antwort von Markus K.:
The problems with the TBC at Canopus already been well documented (through personal demonstration of mine directly from Canopus), and it gives me, because until now no solution for the problems was offered, to be honest too cumbersome now again everything out in detail.
But again the short version:
Under certain circumstances, produce the ADVC-300 in the material played jitter. Some times a short jitter over a few lines in some bands or synonymous continuously over a large area.
Most users do not fall on it for a tape-Dropout held. If the affected tapes on the ADVC-110 recordings are not on the jitter. If another TBC before the ADVC-300 will use the problems no longer synonymous.
Furthermore, despite the sound-audio locked up to 40ms (1 frame) asynchronously. The Asynchronität varies over the term, irgnedwann twice the ADVC-300 is a frame and then makes another synchronicity 0ms ago, which is on a slow 40ms Asynchronität hocharbeitet until a frame is inserted.
And still some other minor details (software bug in the Black-level enhancement which makes the picture brighter, etc.)
Latest firmware and it is obviously synonymous with several devices tested to exclude a defect. The problems all the time I can on each ADVC-300 to reproduce.
Antwort von sarasocke:
Hi Markus,
It was true that would be responsible for assessing the picture but not as optimal. Based on this information and other links, I will monitor with TV tuner more times through the head can go. Especially since the choice of such monitors greatly restricted.
But still 'ne question I had: Is your statement synonymous for the
Samsung 2032WM? It says:
HD Ready, PAL TV Tuner, PIP / PBP, Supports 1080i.
Connections: 15pin D-Sub, DVI-D, HDMI, Component, S-Video, CVBS, SCART, TV.
What distinguishes these TV-tuner or of a "Just TV"? Greeting
Ramsi
Antwort von Markus:
For any kind of video recordings with Halbbildübertragung is a tube TV or CRT monitor the optimal video output device.
All other images generator, such as PC monitors (here synonymous tube equipment) and flat panel displays and projectors have to change the picture to show it to be.
The question is, how reliable your video output to be? For viewing the digitized analog video without the possibility of any parameters, all these options more or less come into question.
