Newsmeldung von slashCAM:Here is the news message with links and images on the pages slashCAM Magazine
Antwort von the_flasher:
I wish you a convenient cigarette lighter and a flashlight function. Thanks in advance. ^ ^
Message TheFlash
Antwort von pixler:
I'd like to have an HD-SDI connection (because the HDMI stuff is garbage anyway) and a decent solid body with many mounting options - but then we would soon be back in the Red - probably synonymous ago from price.
Antwort von Funque:
why is it hdmi waste? hdmi is not good?
Greetz
Funque
Antwort von Angry_C:
HDMI is actually exactly Rotzbus such as SDI, HD SDI, however, can be sent via BNC coaxial cable lines, loosely synonymous 100m. This is of course not with HDMI.
Who wants to hang directly s.die Cam recording system, it is synonymous to the bush really no preference whether HDMI or SDI.
BNC's just more robust than some consumer-HDMI connector.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
HD-SDI to HDMI with Time code is not.
Antwort von Garfield007x:
not that I do not speak the English Language, am
It would be nice, and especially convenient if you could make you as Redation (if any) the trouble to write your own articles or translate at all, other than to applaud only English links ...
Antwort von B.DeKid:
@ Garfield007x
Here is the news message with links and images on the pages slashCAM Magazine If there is a link found / Message
This to "steal" just and NEN own articles is to write out of it probably not The Way to go!
In addition, the articles listed there anyway a bunch of crap!
It shows already s.dem Ranking!
.............................
Instead of rolling shutter should be there rather s.Alias | Wavefront Mayaing to work.
HD output s.Port should be 4:2:2 or even 4:4:4 with at least 10 bits.
A TC Singnal should be tapped.
Those are really important points. These pictures are not actually listed.
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von WoWu:
HDMI is actually exactly Rotzbus such as SDI, HD SDI, however, can be sent via BNC coaxial cable lines, loosely synonymous 100m. This is of course not with HDMI.
Who wants to hang directly s.die Cam recording system, it is synonymous to the bush really no preference whether HDMI or SDI.
BNC's just more robust than some consumer-HDMI connector. Neither HDMI nor SDI is a bus.
The 100 yards are synonymous just barely possible with HD in SD because there is no chance.
And HDMI is also to be transmitted over long distances, depends on the medium and the connection.
And no preference is not synonymous whether HDMI or SDI.
Not only as Bernd correctly observes, HDMI transmits no TC, is synonymous with the sound you have to drive on SDI einwenig more effort.
This can be understood on SDI transmit significantly more flexible and image formats because the timing is changed.
HDMI includes certain timing categorically because it is deliberately intervened in the interface.
HDMI can also be coded Sound Mix.
-And last but not least, HDMI with HDCP is not coupled to SDI. (Who needs it).
You see, there are a lot of significant differences.
@ Kid
HD output s.Port should be 4:2:2 or even 4:4:4 with at least 10 bits. 4:4:4 there are nicht.Nun requiring, in the Bayer mask nothing impossible.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
.....
@ Kid
HD output s.Port should be 4:2:2 or even 4:4:4 with at least 10 bits.
4:4:4 there are nicht.Nun requiring, in the Bayer mask nothing impossible. I thought it was a "a wish" thread ;-))
* Thanks you for the info * MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von WoWu:
yes, yes, but then you talk just of a different camera. Then you can leave out of the same DSLR, if you want what we have good. :-))
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Nen XL H1 successor with 1920x1080 would be enough for me already ;-)
Antwort von WoWu:
ne me non ....
Antwort von B.DeKid:
You play so synonymous in ner other league ;-))
Antwort von WoWu:
But the differences are getting smaller.
And I find it not so bad.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Because I vote for you time.
Happy new video system of Canon of me with the code 4:2:2 MPEG him as the XF Cams have now, and TC Out / In, interchangeable lenses (as in XL H Series) So what would have been a certain charm for me .
I may VDSLR the cams but so what that feels like a camera I could find already installed. Go out the Canon but it not then Sonyand Panasonic pull away.
What do you think really of the square sensor (rumored) of Canon?
You mean something like this makes sense and in how far?
http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/05/the-cmos-sensor-squared-cr2/
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von deti:
But the differences are getting smaller.
And I find it not so bad. Where you have to say that companies like Sony already rumeiern rather to deprive ordinary customers products with 4:2:2 processing. I wonder whether the shot will never come back we go.
Deti
Antwort von WoWu:
@ Kid
These are all speculations from the photo view and have very limited relevance in the video section, where other factors have an influence (dramatically) with. I think you should mix the two worlds do not really zusehr together and do not synonymous because the perfect video camera comes from the breast area. Finally, we are dealing with diametrical factors: Moving / Still Image; real / not real-time, low resolution / high resolution --- according to the projections, etc., etc.
Finally, there is a very important factor that synonymous with a change in geometry of the sensor is not to solve: the fill factor of the very much depends on the quality of the image and to promise just times as 16 bit is so synonymous not without. to be done for now.
And the topic is the future anyway from the DoF Calculator and not from the sensor. And better than it is now synonymous because the bokeh of the circles can be selected.
The euphoria can not really touch me.
Therefore, it is to me still to resolve the fundamental problems.
And since I'm totally with you, Deti.
It creates an artificial market. And above all, with not really fair means and colorful stickers.
The company can understand I know that they try to exploit their old patents in abundance.
Only the media, I understand it not, that they can be harnessed to the cart and demonize synonymous not the consumers who hinterhertapern bleating like sheep, all that is new and behold not the quality, but only after more pixel.
So far, the company can play the game for a long time and probably it is so in the next 20 years synonymous still interlaced, which is Jott pleased. (No offense, Jott)
But a fair way you have to ask the question, of course, synonymous: we were already next, if we had asked for more?
I do not know, but at least we were firm restrictions on the format as BR or HDMI spared and synonymous AVCHD would come to us with his limitations and not the market would develop differently and if the whole range of H.264 would have been negotiable , was already won. But if the player can not, it has no sense synonymous for competitors to offer a different product. Threaded already sent.
