Frage von catfish:
who has one of the tripod head and can tell me how happy he is?
My Camera (JVC GY-DV5000) brings with all drum and Dran almost 7 n.auf the tripod, as is the Manfrotto 501/525 combi which I had previously used fairly s.Rande their forces.
The head of 516er Manfrotto is the price range I wanted to spend. Together with a 350er Camera Tripod should really are quite safe.
How did your experience there?
Greetings, Catfish
PS: No, I can not Vinten Vision 6 Tripod with CF pay synonymous if I would like him ;-)
Antwort von smooth-appeal:
Where you're talking like this ...
The Vision 6 tripod head with carbon fiber, I can highly recommend. However, I still wait for the invoice from the big men with Yacht and Country Property in Majorca ...
Anyway s.der Vision series and the middle Sachtler models can not hold a lot more wrong with the tripod purchase. If you needed s.was as well-preserved impact to come!
Of the two brands apart, I had already Manfrotto, Tripods Cartoni and Miller in their hands.
The Cartonis are only s.der middle class in order. The cheap models I found haptics of the awful and then they did not synonymous next tested. I'll give no 1000 euro for something that feels bad.
Miller is not bad. Playing partly in the upper class with relatively cheap and are used in the purchase, because the brand here in Germany is not so well known.
Manfrotto has a good quality, but is only synonymous with the very expensive head / tripod combos recommended. I do not know how the model was called, but the combo has s.die cost 2000 euros. That was very nicely processed, but through the behavior of the head has not promised to me. And the bad was not synonymous.
As far as I know Vinten and Manfrotto produce some models together. I think of you even mentioned the Touch Pro series is below. Please look at google make clever.
So, I hope I was a little confusion ;-) Foundation
Antwort von catfish:
So, I am now one step next, had a used Sachtler Panorama 7 +7 until anden (thanks s.smooth-appeal even for the short overview of the landscape tripod).
The 7 +7 head inspires me despite the 25 years he has on the hump. Soft launch of pan, all without the typical Manfrotto Ruckler at overcoming the friction. With the restriction that the strength of the counterbalance spring is not adjustable and the balance to the camera can be moved, I can live a little Fummelei After I got the camera in such a way that I am at my favorite low resistance "the camera in both directions, 30 ° from the horizontal prone and they can still stand.
With the tripod legs, I'm not quite so lucky. The Tripod is a very lightweight carbon fiber tripod step. If I have more than 2 / 3 out, then the verwindet Tripod with pan. Ie after the spring swing the camera back slightly. Not much, but yet a little.
I make recordings of plays, is often bound with the Tripod Height in full in the last row. That means many "mini-pans" with a long focal, the rear springs is very unpleasant.
So other legs. Requirements:
* Absolutely rigid
* At least 1.5m high
* Should not cost much ;-)
An idea of mine is a wooden tripod Berlebach (UNI22/100 would be the right size). I've never had a wooden tripod, but know of a photographer to swear. Who of you has been with a wooden tripod and a camera in the weight class (6-7kg) worked?
As an alternative, still in my first posting mentioned Manfrotto 350th Looks incredibly massive in the catalog, whether it would solve my Verwindungsproblem I can not judge.
I am now a bit puzzled ...
Regards
catfish
