Frage von bluescreen:
Hello
Does anyone know the JVC x5e?
For I have strong interest s.der Camera.
But first maybe want to know how it is.
Thank you
Antwort von Jan:
The "cube"?
Should pretty much be the same MC 500 with MiniDV recording, when the test was so Videoaktiv nana. Perhaps you can find with the search what.
An exotic ....
LG
January
Antwort von Acer:
The tests were actually net the best, not folded), especially the display (was criticized. Despite 3CCD she lay behind so many 1Chipper (look at the table: behind Canon MVX350i - that wants to read what)
My opinion:
Image quality: Good (upward trend)
Daylight: very good
Artificial light: good
Sensitivity: Satisfactory (Tendez sinking)
Sound quality: adequate / satisfactory
External Micro: well
None Viewfinder: inadequate (decreasing trend)
Autofocus: Satisfactory (tendency in the middle)
(For Comparison: Panasonic NV-GS35 was Energebnis equally well - both 2.9 = satisfactory)
Antwort von martinsw:
huh? the display does not fold??
The display can be herausklappen to rotate in all directions!
I do not understand it, what you think
Antwort von martinsw:
And the table? where relatively tables are there?
Antwort von Acer:
My Mag 'at home my table. But that would be so 'ne table with all the important features of cams, quite nicely, thank you for the thought-provoking ... "Guest "!!!;.)
Antwort von Daniel_23:
nciht yes I know what you have for a test, but
here
http://www.testberichte.de/test/produkt_tests_jvc_gr_x5e_p53074.html
the test is probably very different from the jvc and there is a PDF document, where you can find other test sentences, cut off all of very good to good.
Weis does not compare to, yes, but ne 3CCD with the GS35??
And how do you get the info that you can not unfold the display ?!?!?!?
The true fact is not synonymous
Antwort von Daniel_23:
So much wrong so I've never read ...
read all views here and you prefer to make himself a Picture of the CAM is sensationally good.
http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/JVC-GR-X5-Camcorders-Review.htm
Antwort von prem:
yes, I am of the opinion now synonymous, I really thought that we find here competent knowledge, but it looks like, this is not the case.
Do not even know that the camera has a swiveling display in all directions, and then pass me the wrong ...
?
Antwort von Acer:
But now up half long. Competent individuals are you "guests" is not synonymous. Will you get everything served on a silver platter and if I do the regurgitation of what I know you're dissatisfied.
Of course, I can say something wrong synonymous, and the display information was wrong (as there is) nothing to deny, you must not rebuke me, the sound makes the music.
And I think that Cam is not particularly Outrageous. You asked for an opinion as x5e is, here's mine.
And with the display, I had confused with another action.
Ciao,
Philip
Antwort von Jan:
VAD - I can look at the issue again has really given only an average test - just like Phillip has said.
Test Result "Good" means even more than average, so out of my head I can still remember s.verauschte images at slumber light / AF lazy, but happy to rummage the test times out tomorrow, what was good / not so good.
Yes Test's can be trusted or not.
The camera is an exotic car, I've never had you there, but said the sales figures for the model, at least not in "my" chain "that some shops had been the model because, unfortunately, for too long ...
If you like it - then they purchase.
LG
Jan
Antwort von Acer:
In order to know "score", with which I had confused the Cam X5:
Antwort von FutureStyle:
VAD VAD? I hope it's not the magazines that I have just hovers before our eyes.
The same can read in the Picture, but no preference, schon mal noticed whoever wins in this Zeitschrifft the tests?? I'll help you, which switches the most ads.
None of you had the cam in private use. But the main thing that we read VAD.
Irony on blue screen: for the next Christmas she reaches far and most are under bad light rather star: irony off
Antwort von Jan:
Digital Videoaktiv test winner of the last months of the Special Issue incl Camcorders Consultant
Beginner:
1. Panasonic GS 27
Mid
- Of the 2005 models
1. Canon MVX 330 close behind Sony / Panasonic
- If the 2006 is still pending probably Panasonic GS 180
Upper middle class:
2005
1 SonyHC 90
2006
1. Pansonic GS 300
"1000" Consumer ¬
2005
1. Panasonic GS 250 close behind Canon MVX 45i
2006.
1. Canon MVX 4i probably has a new champion Panasonic GS 500
HDV entry
2005
SonyHC 1
HDV Semi
Canon XL H 1
Which company that is becoming?
The JVC / Sanjo / Samsung do not have the class is not my problem - but would spur of the 3 companies mentioned s.The top, I had ample time to test all 3 listed companies - they are 5 days a week before me. Most models fall on: excessive noise in less light, lame AF, with some models picture errors / artifacts for swivel's, does not apply to all JVC / Sanyo / LG's, but is a strong tendency for the majority of models.
In order stabilizer, functionality testing, AF speed that I need no VAD, I'll be happy to confirm if I was right.
Another stupid move as a guest reinquatschen / other into rotten, but this time I turn the tables around and did the test with winners to you that you have actually shown no plan, you can all test's synonymous to send - since 2003, had a lot of Vad's .
The VAD is not always right just like us, yes, they have been synonymous reingeschrieben error (Nichtspeicherkartenfunktion Canon MV 830 / JVC GR D 270, or the dubious einwenig JVC HD 100 test)
Making the big companies such as Canon in their own Gesammtkatalogen (2006) false statement can be synonymous to prove, for example: Page 71 Canon Powershot A 430, it has not been described as a 1 / 1, 3 "CCD.
Yes, I had synonymous least the 25 P overlooked function of the GS 500, it's just happen every time error.
And with the user - the let's say a Panasonic consumer has in recent years, is familiar with the models in detail, I would doubt it. Every week I show some people Pansonic the manual mode with shutter speed / aperture / gain code - namely, not to know the most, just like DVD camcorder owners usually have no plan by the VR mode.
Quite AFVB magazines like others - where the claim is SonyHC 17, a better Gesammtperformence to use than the HC 90, video tapes or use a XL 2 in terms of image quality on a par with a Pansonic GS 280, with those judgments, even beginners are very surprised and so incomprehensible , who is it competently.
I'll still sags in the consumer class is a very decent VAD Magazine
many others show no low light pictures, then go with the pictures on another motion, noise filters are known to deteriorate and how they improve the Picture /.
If you are not on magazines, there's is ok and sometimes synonymous to understand.
I once type in JVC / Sanyo / Samsung friend / employee?
Yes, the last representative said my Casio Casio makes the noise-free images at higher gain - the 99% know that it is not true - the opposite is usually the case, eg Z 750, or claiming the Casio with the S 600, the first with a editing in the camera function is true, again not synonymous Pentax has been a long time in the program.
If the other really better in many areas, one should recognize the synonymous
.
Pansonic eg the prior 5-10 years for me were still a mile long of Sonyweg, now they have their weaknesses Stabilizer / low light pretty well under control now, without getting to shine, but you endeckt progress.
Example Test stabilizer Old / New
Pansonic GS 17 / 20 vs. GS 27
Pansonic GS 140 vs. GS 280
LG
Jan
Antwort von Jan:
Still time for advertising in VAD:
here are a few companies:
Apple, Maxtor, Sony, Canopus, Pinnacle, DazzleRovotech, MSI an issue of major companies that I just feel in the hand. How often since gaining Test's Canopus or Sony? Sonyin lately probably rare, Canopus yes - because they are outstanding, the number of video users can confirm here and in other good forums, wenns mal is trouble, as synonymous with the DV Storm 2 card.
LG
Jan
Antwort von blogGreen88:
If you are not on magazines, there's is ok and sometimes synonymous to understand.
I once type in JVC / Sanyo / Samsung friend / employee? with such statements is just a nice chat almost impossible ...
Conclusion alone is not enough to read. No problem to point out such tests and their results show that then sell it as a fact to be presumptuous beyond compare.
and away
Antwort von motiongroup:
I can give the pros for the JVC only right since I have even tested. If I had not received an unbeatable offer for a HC90 she was now my property.
especially over the word exotic, I had to smile ....
smaller brother to the New MC505
http://www.digitalkamera.de/Info/TIPA-Awards_2005-2006_vergeben_3264.asp Even Weird but certainly not perfect mispriced
Best Camcorder: JVC GZ-MC505 G Evirio Synonymous with the previous speaker, I must give legal tests in magazines are more for the ton. Wait, not really for the ton, but rather a collection of features for a number of Cams .. completely forget about the scores and rankings are associated s.denen some pull (see this post or the HC96) contribution.
Antwort von Jan:
The MC 500 / 505 is more due to their hitherto Performence something special, the Pana SDR S 100's did not exist until then.
The beautiful little MC 500, with CF / SD Card MPEG 2 recording, 3 and 5 million pixel CCD was not Wiederworte something special. I have long held for the camera and had as one of the few of my chain in Munich - the model nor an end last year. Unfortunately, my clients had a different opinion - it was a shop keeper - only if you show went well. It is definitely a good camera, the result was X 5, a little worse.
That does not mean that it is sufficient. For me, there's only moment in the price range better, like who the X 5, they should buy and do not go along with the mainstream.
I can only find the insinuation say generally - you have no plan unfair.
Who do I talk to myself with representatives of the major video companies are generally not on an absolute basis Height and know only Fakts, with other good sellers is similar.
VAD, and I think it has JVC GR was 425, gave her the best picture in low light, better than Primus Sony / Pana or Canon.
Entry-level models ala JVC GR D 239 / 245 but unfortunately next back, just take time SonyHC 17 / 23 or Canon MV 900 in the hand, zoom, still image or make a little change. The AF and the stabilizer is simply not as strong as Canon / Sony. Of course, JVC synonymous Pros the 245 points the best camera 2005 with a microphone input, only Sonyhatte HC 39 - was only Canon MVX 330i - Pana 75th GS
That would be the same as if I were to stand motion group as a fool, that I would never say in the way of doing with me strangely, some guests of the fun. I think I have dozens of Consumertip's here now - with very few mistakes.
VAD has the JVC HD 100 yes judged to be very tidy - oddly there were graced with some back and thought the zb. Fringing problem is much worse, I do not know what you want. When the VAD Gesammteigenschaften then praises gibts synonymous again contradictions.
LG
January
Antwort von motiongroup:
That would be the same as if I were to stand motion group as a fool, that I would never say in the way of doing with me strangely, some guests of the fun. I think I have dozens of Consumertip's here now - with very few mistakes.
Why you should do so synonymous, whose father has done in this case synonymous None with you.
It went as I read in this paper represent an exchange of views about the qualities of the X5. These have been shown here in the form of some of test assessments and no more no less.
There many exotic words like an explanation why there is not ..
Exotic because of the housing? On the recording formats are not kanns.
On the Features? hardly
On the power measured? probably not there always synonymous with a quick quiz! different results have emerged.
See Slashcam sense and nonsense of laboratory tests.
The MC500 is indeed an exotic car just why? because of the format? Because of the media? Because of the lack verfügungstehenden see at video editing programs ....? That will be it ..
Oh yes do not forget to 16:9 and the audio bug bug the widely covered in the forums was not None ..
That's just the beautiful landscape in the forums there will never be a green branch.
Speaking of the 505 ne has a fixed plate, according to JVC if they will be popular?
Antwort von Jan:
Yes at the X 5, it is more likely the external appearance of a cube's.
The MC 500 was special because she was not what the weaknesses of other SD camcorder or only in small degree, their microdrive recording possibility she makes really good value, the compression is not synonymous with hard-elected. For the ei or another probably still too expensive.
Guest just once boldly declared: "I" or Phillipp - we've never been the different models in my hand, and views itself as the differences are tested eg behave with White Balance, AF, Low Light, Features or the case agrees with the stabilizer, etc. probably not definitely divided, I have my first impressions usually listed here eg GS 280, and very often I have the magazine then confirmed it was very often what is truth to this. I have the opportunity every day to play synonymous with the cameras, as long as time is. Today I have with my colleagues made the Panasonic DVD camcorder, and ever looked / tested, if it's similar problems with DV editing as Sonygibt.
I like the equivalent of Panasonic 3 CCD camcorders stop better than the X 5, who like the JVC, which should strike.
LG
Jan
Antwort von motiongroup:
http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/JVC-Announces-GZ-MG505---New-Top-of-the-Line-Everio.htmda hast gleich die Infos über die 505er
Antwort von Jan:
Yes the 505 less I know, now more than a few on the Fact's X 5
Sharpness, Color performanceist good / very good, the AF weakens a bit, Low Light is average. The eingabaute mic sound very sound quality music / Language is less good.
+ The number of connections DV / AV In / Out, Headphones / micro jack
46 ° Wide Anglebeim 16 / 9 mode, but they are top.
This is included in Cinematography class a battery for 45 minutes, you can not really understand.
Reingestellt VAD had an indoor test image with all models of class (MVX 45i, X 5, MC 500, GS 250, DVD 403 and PC 1000), the X 5 Picture was not bad, GS 250, but stuck out immediately, Sharpness / Color performancewar better. The MC 500, however, weakened's visible detail visible in turn went down the drain - the typical MPEG 2 problem.
The GS 250 is similar in almost all the score a little better for me, although the X 5 is not bad.
LG
January
Antwort von Acer:
Stupid question between chatted ?!;.)
How much has the WW NV-GS280? Even so, 46 ° or less?
Antwort von Nightfly!:
The GS 250 is similar in almost all the score a little better for me, although the X 5 is not bad.
For VALUATION: January to vote!
GS 250
Gruß,
Nightfly!
Antwort von Jan:
X 5 / MC 500 MF 38 ° / 46 °
GS 250 MF 41 ° / 43 °
LG
January
Antwort von Acer:
Sorry, Jan, but I think the NV-GS280 * blushes *;).
How much has the WW?
Ciao,
Philip
Antwort von Jan:
39 ° / 42 °
LG
Jan
Antwort von Acer:
Thank you, unfortunately, some little WW, but it can sustain itself, right?
Ciao;).
Philipp
