Frage von M.Hulot:
I want to buy me a stereo microphone for my camcorder (SonyDCR14). Mainly I am talking about mitzufilmen concerts my tape. In addition, the microphone must be so (if one directly in front of the stage) is to withstand some volume. I have now gained the hama RMZ 14 that has a pretty good sound quality, but to me synonymous in the low-mode seems to distort anything (although it takes quite a few bass, since it only synonymous Hz has a frequency response p.400). But was still bearable. In rehearsal, however, the distortion was very disturbing. If, of course, distorts the micro camera itself synonymous much more ...
What was the matter of alternatives that are still priced bearable and especially (not important! Distortion) at once at higher volumes? On the Sony-page I can find no reference.
For advice I would be very grateful!
Antwort von Peter S.:
Sound directly from the Grief s.mixer. If you can not reposition the camera in cable reach, use a Funkset. This is no more expensive than a decent micro.
MFG Peter
Antwort von GhostDog:
This we do with the mixer only sometimes, because sometimes the only opportunity is given for the mix and then synonymous not always so hot, depending on what acoustically anyway without PA penetrates to the outside.
I have now found after poking around a Micro, which apparently can stand the sound: Audio-Technica ATR 25th Should I stop testing times.
I am talking just about synonymous to keep the cost low as possible. If Mischpultton there, then I mix it anyway, together with the Micro-sound. But since the Micro is the camera is not the synonymous Hammer and you start and stop so that noise gets onto tape, Mirko is such a need for me anyway. Should not be too expensive. There is still one of beyerdynamic, of course, is the hammer, but it costs 250 euros synonymous ...
Antwort von Markus:
250 euros ... for a good microphone that would be a good price? I often observe that a good image quality much more highly prized than a good sound quality.
Sounds funny, but it is so! - In a double sense! ;-)
Antwort von Jan:
Hello,
Audio Technica mics are not bad reviews from other reviews, your favorites, I have not found.
In stereo microphones Beyerdynamic MCE 82 is good, but expensive
The older SonyECM S 959 C in the test was synonymous not bad and should be getting significantly less than 200 ¬.
Mono microphone AKG C 535 EB or Beyerdynamic MCE 58 (too close to 200 ¬)
Direct Micro's Sennheiser MKH 70 P 48 (approx ¬ 1500) or Beyerdynamic MCE 86 o. 87 thy-called price ca (again the company!)
Wireless Micro's Sennheiser EW 112 P
Perhaps Bring a microphone amplifier improvement?
January
Antwort von Jan:
Hello,
it's me again, the Richmikro Beyerdynamic MCE 86 (I think it was around this) is very popular in this forum, there are several versions:
MCE 86 S II Cam (probably the best cameras for under ¬ 1500) with mini-jack connection, fits this suspension EA 86 is available with hot shoe adapter and windscreen.
With XLR jacks with phantom power MCE 86 II
With XLR jacks with no phantom power (such as Canon XL 1S) MCE 86 S II
January
Antwort von K.-D. Schmidt:
The MCE 86 is a mono microphone!
For stereo provides the MCE 82 s.oder the cheaper, but only slightly worse MCE 72 () suitable for your camcorder.
Greeting
KDS
Antwort von Jan:
Hello,
I am not synonymous sound engineer, I have looked up in Videoaktivdigital (synonymous with scores on the Internet) or issue June / July 2005 Page 73 times. The new models which I have described above had been given a full test page. All 3 were described as directional microphones, and the Mag has all the varieties tested in 4 Stereo Microphones (your MCE 82 was the best) - Mono (the majority) - directional microphones - Wireless Microphones
But there are a plurality of different (synonymous older) versions of MCE 86
The video's synonymous FachMag make mistakes so happens synonymous, as the alleged 4:2:2 sampling at Sony's HDV 1080i's what the system was clearly written.
January
