I would like to publish a video on YouTube. As background music I used a very popular song of Bonnie Tyler.
Where can I get the rights / permission now that I can use the song?
What would cost a thing like that about?
Thanks & Regards! HLG
Antwort von Pianist:
But you can lubricate your sandwiches already own?
What is so hard on it, sometimes to look at the back of the CD and then to contact the publisher to just to ask this question? Only there can tell you what it cost, and issue the appropriate permit, if it is ever issued.
Incidentally, the order was wrong: Ask first, then install in the film.
Matthias
Antwort von ruessel:
Quote:
What would cost a thing like that about?
Ask the relevant record company. For a DVD production of 500 units were called us a few years inclusive 1000 ¬ (1 piece of music of a CD) and paid (Philips Classics label, Hamburg).
Antwort von Jott:
For Bonnie Tyler ("Hero"), I would at least once with a zero count more behind it - and bring it synonymous with the clear prohibition on the track at all with your work here.
We had just the case that the board wanted a provincial bank not even a too-familiar title for his Imagefilmchen. For fun, despite knowing better times to be confirmed by the record company, so that the man knew what was the point: about 100,000 ¬.
Antwort von 1spektrum:
Dear HLG,
I can only connect to the statements.
It costs "an arm and a leg"; and as I said before: the order was wrong. You first need a legally secure piece of music should have and then start with the cut, when audio and video are to be reconciled.
By the way, a cover version version is not synonymous! The content ID system detects synonymous "musical compositions", meaning that synonymous in this case, the rights violated.
A tip of me, but by seeking to produce the pages of Youtube or Myspace synonymous to new bands, his own pieces; get content but your idea is very close. And that you write to it.
Which then can you explain what you want to use the audio. I'm sure that feeling one way or another tape is very flattered when using their piece.
Employed and sent that will cost nothing!
Greetings
1spektrum
Antwort von hlg:
Thanks for the quick replies!
So the numbers are so good and the other side of evil! : (
It was originally designed as a private video, because do you still worry about licensing. But as several people found the film well and wanted to see, I wanted to upload it on Youtube, and da comb just report the violation of protection, etc.
For my next "project" I'll be your tip (1spektrum) to heart;)
Antwort von hlg:
"Pianist" wrote:
But you can lubricate your sandwiches already own?
What is so hard on it, sometimes to look at the back of the CD ...
Matthias
I want to see how are you going to do without a CD: o)
Antwort von Pianist:
"Hlg" wrote:
I want to see how are you going to do without a CD: o)
But that is ever the first problem: If you think about it, to use a certain music, you should definitely have a CD of them to be able to actually just look on the back. If you have somewhere an audio file, receive this important information is missing probably, if they are not just included in the metadata.
Matthias
Antwort von NEEL:
The "back of a CD is also usually not the correct address. You have ran s.den licensors. Not every music publisher has synonymous over the full license rights, often facing only the license for a particular CD-acquired pressure, often the licensing rights are owned by the artist or elsewhere. ("Clearing" technical term) lawyers or experts commissioned research because it can get quite complicated when the film is to be evaluated internationally and in any country can theoretically rights of third parties in the film practice of the license procurement. TV stations have framework agreements with the Gema, that can use this in principle, any music, as long as they send the film only and does not want to sell on DVD. So better follow the above advice and use royaltyfree Music of new bands (note: synonymous clarify here that the bands have not yet signed up, because often the bands themselves do not know what exactly is with their rights).
Antwort von Pianist:
"Neel" wrote:
The "back of a CD is also usually not the correct address. You have ran s.den licensors. Not every music publisher has synonymous over the full license rights, often facing only the license for a particular CD-acquired pressure, often the licensing rights are owned by the artist or elsewhere.
Exactly. But all this we learn from the publisher or record company. Because the must know, of whom they have acquired rights.
Matthias
Antwort von mann:
"Neel" wrote:
... Well: Better ... Royalty free use music of new bands (note: synonymous clarify here that the bands have not yet signed up, because often the bands themselves do not know what exactly is with their rights).
How is that actually, if-we-say the tape then six months later agreements with the collecting society (VG) music edition plus Gema does stay, then the pre-produced pieces of royalty-free or will then practically EVERYTHING under Gema management, or does each of the contract concluded between them from?
Antwort von 1spektrum:
@ NEEL (Note: to clarify synonymous here that the bands have not yet signed up, because often the bands themselves do not know exactly what their rights are with) [/ quote].
Jepp -> therefore synonymous looking again for background information! Is on the tube sides or on their website that they are at a record deal, they have given up their own music rights s.das label.
A positive commitment of a band member goes, then no more.
Otherwise there is a copyright violation synonymous here.
Sure, that's now all a lot of wood, but now YouTube is no "legal vacuum". Quite the contrary.
The "warning industry" has grown into a new economic branch.
Therefore - search> always good.
Greetings
1spektrum
Antwort von 1spektrum:
@ Man How is that actually, if-we-say the tape then six months later agreements with the collecting society (VG) music edition plus Gema does stay, then the pre-produced pieces of royalty-free or will then practically EVERYTHING under Gema management, or does each of the contract concluded between them from [/ quote]
I pull back, only leads to confusion ...
Antwort von Pianist:
"1spektrum" wrote:
Certainly has every tape that is seriously considering turning to s.eine development company, sample recordings of himself. These are taken for granted. Sure, so is their ticket. One has to first show what they can. But older recordings that are not part of this content to be prevented, because the VG designed course, a special concept for the X tape, the tape s.die binds. "Mature stuff" should disappear, therefore, not to destroy the concept.
Honestly - I do not understand a word. Societies create concepts?
Matthias
Antwort von mann:
"1spektrum" wrote:
"Mature stuff" should disappear, therefore, not to destroy the concept.
What do you mean?
So what I would be interested in is whether I get a problem if I now ne CD with royalty-free license plus Mucke buy, but the artists who had licensed his Mucke s.den CD-Verlag, next month, all with the VG and Gema handles.
Antwort von 1spektrum:
No, that can not be any problems. Just that you have indeed purchased a license.
