Frage von Straubmeier:
Hi s.alle,
I'm new here, and had read some time with, thank s.alle which I could help (already there but do not know :-))
Now I have a problem, I need an HD Cam ect for weddings corporate videos. What is good up to 3500 ¬
The search way, I have already activated and I've read a wolf synonymous. I no longer look through, just too much information, too many formats Cams ................................
Sorry for the Tread, but somehow I've given up, next to search. I would favor the Canon XH A1s, but I'd rather ne shoulder mounted camcorders, but the Prices :-(
Cam makes sense? Can you man synonymous longer use or will soon hit another format out and everything will be different. Is there ne shoulder mounted camcorders synonymous in the price range with HD (
Incidentally, I've been all of Canon (XM2, HV40, and Miscellaneous Fotocamere incl 5dmark II), but am not fixated.
Thanks s.alle, sorry for the nerves.
Gruß Rudi
Antwort von kalle70:
Only the quiet brown ....!
Have you looked here before?
Antwort von Straubmeier:
Sure I :-) so yes, I'm the Canon, this will indeed be synonymous ichs'd better only if we all then continue reading and then see what else there is or is not synonymous :-) and then again in front of starts and anderey then again what is it somehow captures s.durchzudrehen, the boys in my shop was synonymous not really helping (Canon is good but Sonyand jvc ...........) and already I start up again: -- )
In normal cams I never had such problems, but I know for me at least.
Gruß Rudi
Antwort von kalle70:
Do you honestly believe that a different camera makes a bad movie better?
Certainly not.
I see it so that the camera is the tool that makes the Masters to be with the workpiece.
Most of the films of my "hobby friends" are so bad because basic things are not right.
Cut to long, lousy idea, shaky camera, light is not set, lousy sound, settings, etc. .... uniformly
Antwort von Straubmeier:
You're right, I think I've used :-)
It's like when you shoot, which makes the picture behind the cam :-)
I'll buy the ding, and working s.mir and not s.irgentwelchen formats etc. I just get out the best.
, Thank you once jar file, need photographic assistance, at any time.
Gruß Rudi
Antwort von kalle70:
You're right, I think I've used :-)
It's like when you shoot, which makes the picture behind the cam :-)
I'll buy the ding, and working s.mir and not s.irgentwelchen formats etc. I just get out the best.
, Thank you once jar file, need photographic assistance, at any time.
Gruß Rudi The photograph I have left hanging for the filming. (manual Contax with Zeiss)
But it was a mistake.
Better a single perfect picture makes me excited as a 25 or 50 per minute, which make me doubt it s.mir. ;-)
Antwort von Pixelzähler:
Take the Canon, it is always worth its money.
HDV, it will probably be synonymous in years to come, it is a synonymous in the broadcast field is still used format that does not use ENG few suppliers.
I myself had also long been doubt about what I buy, both to ensure Cam synonymous take time for a vacation and make the other just for regional and interregional synonymous News Channel with light equipment to take place the heavy, unwieldy Schultercams.
The presence of autofocus and image stabilization in some cases, extremely comfortable, the image quality ranges from absolute, even the DV output to 16:9 for the public broadcasters is excellent.
The automatic exposure (if you're using it) beyond criticism, the noise behavior in low-light area at +6 dB so well that the other day with a dub feel on Digi-Beta, the boys were little, what they saw.
You get money for DAS little better (I remember after a long search of nothing).
Regards
