Frage von Torsten_Rüdiger_Hansen:
Hello,
who knows the Camera Panasonic NV-GS27 EG and can tell me whether the
"true" 16:9 can? In the instructions, only the "black bars
above and below will be displayed to select a widescreen feel to
let. According to some vendors, however, the device can be 16:9, but I
the two statements can see a big contradiction. Maybe
but only the instructions poorly translated.
--
Answers to public questions, please ONLY public.
My mailbox (email) is only 2 times a month entmüllt.
Also I do not live in the calculator, answers could be a few days
dauern.Grüße of TRH
Antwort von Detlev Hoffmann:
"Torsten Rüdiger Hansen"
wrote in news post
Who knows the Camera Panasonic NV-GS27 EG (MiniDV) # # #
> Hello,
>
> Who knows the Camera Panasonic NV-GS27 EG and can tell me whether the
> "True" 16:9 can? In the instructions, only the "black
Girder
1. Wrong group
2. No, you can not really 16:9
Detlev
Antwort von Dieter Lefeling:
Torsten Rüdiger Hansen wrote:
> Who knows the Camera Panasonic NV-GS27 EG and can tell me whether the
> "True" 16:9 can?
What is for you "real" 16:9? Per true 16:9 CCD with 960x576?
How many cameras can be and what the cost? Or do you have a
Recording anamorphic aspect ratio of 720x432 by => without Aufloesungsgewinn?
What advantage would be the consequences?
> In the instructions, only the "black bars
> Above and below will be displayed to select a widescreen feel to
> Let. According to some vendors, however, the device can be 16:9,
The remainder of the picture has a Seitenverhaeltnis of 16:9, yes. <8)
After all, the instructions in this case seems to be honest.
> Where I
> The two statements can see a big contradiction. Maybe
> But only the instructions poorly translated.
Remain realistic. Do you have a camcorder in the beginners class
around 300 euros, "16:9" realized otherwise than by 720x432 letterbox?
Camera on, select 4:3, left and right Bildraender view.
Switch to 16:9. Falls above or below what is gone or left / right
what about this? AFAIK, the GS27 of the first case (Letter).
Dieter
Antwort von Günter_Hackel:
Dieter Lefeling wrote:
> Torsten Rüdiger Hansen wrote:
>
>> Who knows the Camera Panasonic NV-GS27 EG and can tell me whether the
>> "Real" can be 16:9?
>
> What's for you "real" 16:9?
Hello
which is expected out of context but clear. Correct 16:9
requires a chip, this format of the scan can be synonymous. What the
Camera, IMO with the intention to deceive is concerned, is to cover a
Part of the "4:3" format, ie a reduction of the image content rather
its extension.
gh
Antwort von Torsten_Rüdiger_Hansen:
"Detlev Hoffmann" wrote:
> 1 Wrong group
And what would be better suited?
--
Answers to public questions, please ONLY public.
My mailbox (email) is only 2 times a month entmüllt.
Also I do not live in the calculator, answers could be a few days
dauern.Grüße of TRH
Antwort von Torsten_Rüdiger_Hansen:
Dieter Lefeling wrote:
> What's for you "real" 16:9?
That what makes the SonyPC 101 and in my calculator synonymous than 16:9
arrives (anamopxyz. .. - I can not remember this word).
Now made a test recording shows the following: For the same
Preferences / requirements such as the Sony is a 16:9 Bildschirmfesnter
packed. The Sony picture is correct and proportionnelles bild filling (if
synonymous only 720 x 576). The Picture of the Panasonic is * on all 4 sides with *
black bars limited. But here is synonymous "720 * 576" is displayed.
Mir is ultimately no preference, as 16:9 is realized when the
Feeling fit, since the finished film on alternate settings
both cameras will be based.
> Do you have a camcorder in the beginners class
> To 300 euro, the "16:9" realized otherwise than by 720x432 letterbox?
The Sonyhabe I get for 450 that does that .. Why 432?
--
Answers to public questions, please ONLY public.
My mailbox (email) is only 2 times a month entmüllt.
Also I do not live in the calculator, answers could be a few days
dauern.Grüße of TRH
Antwort von Dieter Lefeling:
Torsten Rüdiger Hansen wrote:
> Dieter Lefeling wrote:
>
>> What's for you "real" 16:9?
>
> This is what makes the SonyPC 101 and in my calculator synonymous than 16:9
> Arrives (anamopxyz. .. - I can not remember this word).
To my knowledge, uses the PC101 neither a "true" 16:9 - CCD still
an anamorphic optics. Accordingly, she works like other cameras
synonymous: Recording with 720x432 with subsequent distortion of 720x576.
In other words, this is better than aufloesungstechnisch not letterbox.
Okay, a true 16:9 - CCD synonymous anything else would be very expensive. <8)
> Meanwhile made a test recording shows the following: For the same
> Settings / specifications as the Sony is a 16:9 Bildschirmfesnter
> Up. The Sony picture is correct and proportionnelles bild filling (if
> Synonymous only 720 x 576).
Exactly.
> The Picture of the Panasonic is * on all 4 sides with *
> Black bars limited. But here is synonymous "720 * 576" is displayed.
Letterbox precisely. Of the 576 lines are 432 for the actual Picture
used, the rest is the black border above and below.
> I, it is ultimately no preference, as 16:9 is realized,
Well, there are already procedures depending on the qualitative differences:
> If the
> Impression fits, since the finished film on alternate settings
> Both cameras will be based.
You could apply a letterbox anamorphic video to convert and so with the
anamorph Sony already recorded video combine.
>> Do you have a camcorder in the beginners class
>> Around 300 euros, "16:9" realized otherwise than by 720x432 letterbox?
>
> The Sonyhabe I get for 450 that does that .. Why 432?
The 432 are just 9 / 16 of the 768th
The fact that the camera 768, but 720 is used, has other reasons.
Dieter
Antwort von Detlev Hoffmann:
"Torsten Rüdiger Hansen" wrote in news post
Re: Who knows the Camera Panasonic NV-GS27 EG (MiniDV) # # #
> "Detlev Hoffmann" wrote:
>
>> 1 Wrong group
>
> And what would be better suited?
In any case, not the de.alt.rec.digitalfotografie in which this
Tread as cross-posting (or how the heist?) Appeared synonymous. Then
covered my answer.
Gruss
Detlev
Antwort von Torsten_Rüdiger_Hansen:
"Detlev Hoffmann" wrote:
> In any case, not the de.alt.rec.digitalfotografie
Why not? It is finally digital recording of images.
--
Answers to public questions, please ONLY public.
My mailbox (email) is only 2 times a month entmüllt.
Also I do not live in the calculator, answers could be a few days
dauern.Grüße of TRH
Antwort von Detlev Hoffmann:
"Torsten Rüdiger Hansen" wrote in news post
Re: Who knows the Camera Panasonic NV-GS27 EG (MiniDV) # # #
> "Detlev Hoffmann" wrote:
>
>> In any case, not the de.alt.rec.digitalfotografie
>
> Why not? It is finally digital recording of images.
>
Sorry, as you will in the group probably de.alt.rec.digitalfotografie
alone
From selfishness, you have probably the sense 'photography' not quite
understood ;-)
Grüßle
Detlev
Antwort von Kristian Schmees:
Torsten Rüdiger Hansen wrote:
[Camera Panason ** NV ...]
>> 1 Wrong group
>
> And what would be better suited?
Good question.
I would take de.rec.tv.technik - although I synonymous not 100%
find. Is s.Thema but closer than ever in a comp * *- Group.
Regards
Kristian
Antwort von Ka Prucha:
"Torsten Rüdiger Hansen" wrote
>
> This is what makes the SonyPC 101 and in my calculator synonymous than 16:9
> Arrives (anamopxyz. .. - I can not remember this word).
>
> Meanwhile made a test recording shows the following: For the same
> Settings / specifications as the Sony is a 16:9 Bildschirmfesnter
> Up. The Sony picture is correct and proportionnelles bild filling (if
> Synonymous only 720 x 576). The Picture of the Panasonic is * on all 4 sides with *
> Black bars limited. But here is synonymous "720 * 576" is displayed.
Servus
The Canon MVX200i is useful 16x9, but then
the "loose balance" is no longer in operation because the extra pixels
yes for the additional width needed.
mfg Ka Prucha
