Frage von oliver42:
Obviously the picture quality of HDV and AVCHD is roughly comparable.
For HDV is the fact that it can be worked well on "normal" PCs. However, the deal with tapes is a bit cumbersome.
For AVCHD is the fact that it can be easily stored and distributed on SD cards, as synonymous scene. However, the material for the high compression can be set to normal "PCs can not be edited.
So I ask myself for years: Why is there no HD camcorder, save the HDV to SD card?
Antwort von Zizi:
For AVCHD is the fact that it can be easily stored and distributed on SD cards, as synonymous scene. However, the material for the high compression can be set to normal "PCs can not be edited.
A normal PC from today's view (QuadCore, SSD and fast Ram)
Program comes with the current cut loose but cope?
MPG2 storage on cards or sheets of medium there eh JVC.
Only compressed Mpeg4 just better than second
HDV is synonymous with respect to its own compression cassettes and is not 1:1 on SD cards to transfer.
Auserd who wants in 1440?
Why, however, never or not the cameras are stored on cards Mpeg2 / speicjherten I know, however, not synonymous.
Meanwhile, I will not at all synonymous more.
After this, however, have often sought earlier .. Too bad somehow.
Antwort von Jott:
The original HDV - Standard requires that the devices must have a tape drive, or may not be 'draufstehen HDV. Without leaving the Standard, the manufacturers will only option, in addition to tape recording synonymous cards installed. Sonybietet such devices for two years in parallel to (tape and CF card, 1:1 identical data stream, if desired), if not synonymous in the lower price. Compatible HDV offer on map synonymous SonyEX1 / 3 and various JVC cameras if you want that - only that there is not so, because no tape drive is there.
Antwort von oliver42:
A normal PC from today's view (QuadCore, SSD and fast Ram)
Program comes with the current cut loose but cope?
Is it right? Can I expect for example that will handle AVCHD with Premiere Elements or whatever editing program would be recommended?
Antwort von DigiDau:
.. Speaks for AVCHD, that it can be easily stored and distributed on SD cards, as synonymous scene. However, the material for the high compression can to "normal" PCs can not be processed .. So if you eg HDV Split to play along the TS and takes the scene detection is enabled, the problem is synonymous. With AVCHD you must now distinguish between synonymous Progressive (p) and interlaced, as regards the processing s.PC. The former is more problematic for Nachberarbeitung and NLE. I have the time of the Panasonic SD707. At a i7, 10 GB Ram, useful graphics card and numerous test programs for editing, I'm with 1080/50p about the performance that I had in June 2006 with my first HDV cam at the time of SonyHC3 PC.
I still have the HV20 and what s.geht the post on my current system, a dream.
The difference between AVCHD and HDV 50i to find synonymous not particularly large. I therefore sometimes synonymous on thinking whether I again buy a Canon XH A1s. But the sequel is supposed to record MPEG card. For as pricklend I find the tape as a recording medium will not synonymous.
Antwort von tommyb:
It makes a difference whether one synonymous per second
50 x 1920 x 1080
processed or only
25 x 1920 x 540
(Which is then stretched to 1,080).
1080p50 is that all people are screaming so now even a thick chunks and now needs much more resources of time than anything before seen (synonymous 720p50).
Antwort von actaion:
It makes a difference whether one synonymous per second
50 x 1920 x 1080
processed or only
25 x 1920 x 540
(Which is then stretched to 1,080).
1080p50 is that all people are screaming so now even a thick chunks and now needs much more resources of time than anything before seen (synonymous 720p50). It must, however, hot
50 x 1920 x 540 (not 25 x 1920 x 540, for 25i makes no camera ...)
720p50, ie 50 x 1280 x 720 should accordingly be about the same complex.
Antwort von tommyb:
No need it.
During editing, you see that is only one of the two fields, the other is rejected (or simply not shown). Only the decoder may still be read the second field and then only reject but that all depends on the decoder.
Antwort von TheBubble:
1080p50 is that all people are screaming so now even a thick chunks and now needs much more resources of time than anything before seen (synonymous 720p50). A maximum of twice as much space and computing power as the corresponding interlaced format;)
Antwort von tommyb:
Is more than twice as much "not very much more?
Now I'm going 150 or 300 on the motorway - is this really just such a small difference?
Once the 8-cores of Intel will, we will probably synonymous qualify some of the liquid in AVCHD 1080p50 - provided the NLE Manufacturer pennen continue to grafikkartengestützten decoders (there are exceptions, fortunately) ...
