Frage von hozz:
Hello,
I hope what comes next has not been all too often something like this because I've found nothing here, first thing I weiterhilft :-)
So, I'm looking for
a wide angle lens
for my SonyXR520VE. Plus a few general questions because I am here the absolute Beginners:
In what was at wide-angle lenses generally pay attention to? The important thing is the best possible picture quality, the rest (weight, obs handsome looks, and anything else I know) has no preference. Wishes to have a no distortion and clean, sharp images with no noticeable loss of quality (in Comparison to situations where no lens is used).
The distortion depends only of the "zoom" from (0.7 is enough for me) or synonymous of the lens quality? And in what area to move popular magnifications?
What else is there for criteria (loss of light? Loss of sharpness ?...?)
What is the difference between these two as examples, Sony (both 0.7x):
VCL-HGE07A (UVP 100€) and
VCL HGA07 (RRP ¬ 200)?
How it looks with third-party, you can use the synonymous? I noticed that the XR520 has no real thread in front, you can attach the same way as the Sony Lenses originals? Is it sufficient to correct "Anschlussweite" (30 or 37mm?? Eighth), it is necessary or be specially constructed for Sony cameras?
If third-party go, what companies are there? Perhaps someone has the same should be (a recommendation no more than ~ 200 ¬ cost)?
Mir is a general lack of anything relating to Any additional data, would be nice if someone could help :-)
Antwort von kalle70:
Would a Raynox HD5050Pro recommend. Approx. 90 euro, with 37mm, good optical performance, fit s.The Camera
However, there is no converter without distortion!
Such a part should be exactly determined for a camera designed, manufactured and will be charged. Would probably cost more than the camera itself
Antwort von hozz:
Thanks for the tip. I'm gonna go look for videos!
One more question:
What is the difference between "thick" look like MF lenses (such as the Raynox or HGA07) and the "thin" (eg HGE07A) the more like a medium-thick plastic disk.
I am surprised that at the same magnification such "Big differences in the pattern exist.
Antwort von kalle70:
Thanks for the tip. I'm gonna go look for videos!
One more question:
What is the difference between "thick" look like MF lenses (such as the Raynox or HGA07) and the "thin" (eg HGE07A) the more like a medium-thick plastic disk.
I am surprised that at the same magnification such "Big differences in the pattern exist. For several thick lenses were used.
One makes the Wide Angleund reduced the distortion of the first.
It is synonymous with the 3 lenses.
Antwort von hozz:
Thank you.
High-aperture wide-angle lenses require a very high structural costs, which is why cheap wide-angle lenses generally have a relatively low intensity compared to the typical standard lenses.
Do you generally worry about lowlight shots? Just inside, where you need a WW, then ists rather darker.
Is there a visible loss of brightness (for the Raynox, or in general), let's say in there with not-too-bright light and moderate lighting?
Antwort von kalle70:
The loss s.Licht can be ignored.
He is really very small.
Home Of The XR520 is not just faint, therefore, will not adversely affect the converter.
Antwort von hozz:
I rumgesucht something: the Raynox HD 5050PRO does not seem to be compatible for the XR520, see Annex.
And it seems to me must be specifically constructed for the Camera (or adapter), that is true or is it some kind default port?
