Frage von Blackeagle123:
Hello,
I have the Panasonic NV-MX 300!
Am I an considering buying WW to it 05x probable vll even a 0.75 x!
Will my lens with one WW brighter? Or is the only and solely from the size of the WW's, so in my 43mm ...?
Then yes I would have a very large depth of field, which I probably only with aperture and exposure number or ND filters not hinbekommen! That would mean that my films seen by large numbers despite the wide exposure Anglewieder cheap out ...!?
I would have to zoom to get shallow depth of field back to ... But then I need not synonymous Wide Anglemehr, right?
Or am I then to the SLD, despite wide-angle adapter with a zoom adapter without at the same depth?
If this were all that with a Fisheye (fish-eye) nor extreme?
That keeps me then that is a bit on it, such a purchase an adapter to ...
PS: Let us not argue about depth of field, I use rather than the depth of field! ( "Terfenschiefe");)
Love Greetings
Constantin
Antwort von GhostDog:
moin,
So erstma ... 's WW factor of 0.75 x wide angle gives you less than a factor of 0.5 x. .. the smaller the factor, the more you will achieve weitwinkel (but synonymous distortions and baschattungen)
durch'n weitwinkel you will get a better tiefenschärfe ... ->
Depth of the hanging of the object and the distance from blende is, you mean by a ww-will be presented objectively, the objects in the image synonymous and therefore less sharply
in the luminous intensity I have to fit ... 's good ww lenses can certainly have more light to pass through (which is synonymous with unwanted lichteinstreuungen can drag on) .. But the optics of the camera is indeed objective, behind the ww and is thus not so eigentlch auto brighter? I would now tap times ...
Antwort von rtzbild:
PS: Let us not argue about depth of field, I use rather than the depth of field! ( "Terfenschiefe");)
Constantin Neeee, ie Schiefenterfe! °
SCNR
Olli
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
Hello, Olli:) okay ^ ^ Schiefenterfe
Thanks to "guest", why are they more expensive than 0.75 x WW essays 0.5 x? I truly thought would be 0.75 x more wide angle, because if one 2x0, 75 notes, has been synonymous ne greater number as when one 2x0, 5 multiplied!
2x0, 5 = 1
2x0, 75 = 1.5
or?
Viele liebe Grüße
Constantin
Antwort von GhostDog:
Am I an considering buying WW to it 05x probable vll even a 0.75 x!
Will my lens with one WW brighter? Or is the only and solely from the size of the WW's, so in my 43mm ...?
Then yes I would have a very large depth of field, which I probably only with aperture and exposure number or ND filters not hinbekommen! That would mean that my films seen by large numbers despite the wide exposure Anglewieder cheap out ...!? 0.5 is broader
ww are basically never been brighter
put a converter on the lens, natural light is lost
The focus area is through the lens bigger overall (sharp)
Antwort von Markus:
Hi Constantin,
the factor of a lens is how the camcorder lens changed during screwed Converter: factors <1 indicate wide-angle lenses because they reduce the focal lengths. Factors> 1 indicate telephoto lenses, with the potential to achieve greater focal lengths.
Example: A lens with a factor of 0.75 x represents 50 mm focal (50 mm × 0.75 =) 37.5 mm, a lens with a factor of 0.5 x (50 mm × 0.5 =) 25, 0 mm.
A lot of useful information about the properties (and poss. Optical errors) of lenses you can find in the
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
Hello,
Thank you!
When changing the focal, with a wide angle, then what exactly happened with my picture? I mean, smaller focal net is indeed strictly larger picture, right?
Love Greetings
Constantin
Antwort von Markus:
The Picture) remains unchanged in its size (area of the image intensifier. But that did not mean you sure? ;-)
Focal will be reduced, then the optics are wide-angle. That is always the case.
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
oh, right:)
But why are 0.75 x because then more expensive? is a rare degree, or a measure that is especially used in professional movies?
Do you think 0.5 x wide angle is already too?
We have seen in 0.75 x wide angle large difference?
Love Greetings
Constantin
Antwort von Jan:
Hello you,
I think that the intensity of the wide-angle converter remains the same or slightly worse.
There are of a 50 mm Canon Lens with intensity 1.0!! for SLR cameras.
In principle, however, was rounded up. Is quite logical, in principle, should be at 1.0 by all the lights go out completely as lentils and s.end again, but this is impossible, because due to reflections are always some losses. The same applies to converter, the better the coating of the lens the less light is lost.
In my opinion, but it can not be better, only equal to, or worse.
That in a 2.0 x teleconverter lens of a camcorder with 1.8 intensity - 3.6 makes is well known, why not use a teleconverter but everyone looks to the basic look so bright as possible and the optical zoom is fairly decent. Everything that comes front lens moves "" more or less light, already synonymous filter (I do not mean ND filter, where it's intended). So I've learned, at least in photography, I would of camcorder but experts can learn.
LG
January
