Frage von Lepkojis:
I used to do double-Super Eight filmed, and I've always have videographers annoyed. Have you abandoned the shooting synonymous.
But now I see that now the video quality of a super present.
Now I want to start filming again, and could be a Canon XL 1 s used to acquire. Is this a camera for the next 2-3 years, or because I buy a discontinued model. But rather think not, or?
What am I to pay for the model? Have no idea.
Are there models around 2000 ¬ with beserer quality?
Soon would be glad of something to someone higher, because the camera I need to buy soon if I have the interest.
I'm new here ud have no experience with forums. (Was an idea of my son.)
Antwort von Luis1906:
Are there models around 2000 ¬ with beserer quality? Sure ... the Panasonic DVX100BE! A discarded DVX100AE is synonymous to 2000 ¬ drin.
My next cam will in any case be DVX100BE.
Greeting
Antwort von Luis1906:
SonyVX2100 - Top Cam, will cost around 2300 ¬ new, anything that is needed, or halt the VX2000, one of Canon XM2 (about 1600 ¬ )....
Antwort von Markus:
... could be a Canon XL 1 s used to acquire. Is this a camera for the next 2-3 years, or because I buy a discontinued model. The XL1S is definitely a discontinued model. And not just since yesterday. ;-)
Do you want to film in 4:3 or 16:9 in synonymous? Should the new camcorders record in standard definition (SD), or possibly high resolution (HD)?
Antwort von Lepkojis:
That was my question, I absolutely need HD? Think widescreen yes.
I want a top picture on a beamer, but the film needs no cinema standards, as wrts too expensive I think.
If I understand you correctly, would you give me the Canon XL 1 is not recommended for the beginning. What could you recommend to use?
Does it make more sense in 2000 ¬ spout a good model to invest than in a mediocre new Camera?
Were glad to answer. Thank you
Antwort von Markus:
What could you recommend to use? I would also s.eine SonyVX2100, but the idea with the Panasonic DVX100 I find synonymous gut. Both are, however, 4:3-cameras, but with a so-called Anamophot where are you from true 16:9 camcorder.
Does it make more sense in 2000 ¬ spout a good model to invest than in a mediocre new Camera? The thing has two sides: For the same money you get a better-equipped model, if it's not new anymore, but is needed. However, I recommend that anyone with the camcorder not know enough, a used machine to buy. Except perhaps at the dealer, then it is synonymous warranty.
Antwort von lippsiagolf:
Please synonymous think that you have the right HD-capable editing software need.
Otherwise, perhaps you have a great camera and you have the problems of high quality video files to edit.
The editing software will cost a few euros synonymous and fuffzich.
Sign up but again, please, before you finally decide.
So, good luck, you'll already get baked! Who wants that's synonymous and creates the wrong mood makes Videofilmerei "
Greeting
Lippsiagolf
Antwort von schingge:
It comes late but thank you it comes from.
Have a very good second-hand Canon XM2 purchased. Well now I will slowly start times. Issues as determined enough.
How about with the 16:9 These Cam While it may be but I think I've given an understanding problem. Do I need to 16:9 in the picture but with a normal monitor above and below cut. Is not.
I have since a mistake?
Antwort von Axel:
I have since a mistake? No, but if you all the aspects outlined here, you could easily have a brain twister, that's when you suddenly reach the level of immersion in 16:9 and 4:3 one. This is the Dharma Body of Buddha.
The above issues are addressed in
this Starting of the things you write, you have either not recorded in 16:9 or 4:3 your TV is on zoom (or similar) is
set. For Purchase DVDs will not be one's conscious, since these instructions for the DVD player included, the first TV to letterbox playback to force.
Antwort von Axel:
Do I need to 16:9 in the picture but with a normal monitor above and below cut. Is not. The picture may also be distorted (perhaps you had not noticed). That would be a good sign.
