Frage von Auf Achse:
Keep in touch!
I feel the cable of the headphones on my nerves! It constantly gets tangled in the clothes and plucking s.der Camera or s.Headphones! Is there any wireless headphones for such an operation? With s.Headphones transmitter s.der Camera and receiver?
Has anyone an idea how the cost itself may eventually build or Manufacturer of whom are there any?
Thanks and regards,
Auf Achse
Antwort von carstenkurz:
The most compact in this respect that I have found is a Bluetooth-Stereosender/Empfängerset. Both parts have Battery, can be charged via USB, 3.5mm stereo jack s.Ein-and output.
Uncomplicated operation. The sound is not high-end (compressed transmission), but noise-and interference. Can be used as synonymous headsets for mobile phones.
http://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B000JFVDGG/
- Carsten
Antwort von Auf Achse:
Servus Carsten!
Thanks for your info, s.Bluetooth I have not even thought of, which is actually exactly what I want! Convince me but the reviews in the not very customer reviews. What are your experiences?
What else is commendable in this area?
For me it's important: 3.5 mm jack s.Sender, the longest possible battery life, battery charging via USB is not preferred, at least 5m interference range, good sound quality but not high end. Receiver part (3.5 mm jack) which I can infect my own headphones, so no Blueetoothheadset from another manufacturer.
Who has experience with it and I still can recommend other Manufacturer?
Thank you for your info,
Auf Achse
Antwort von carstenkurz:
Da gibts not much. For complex signals, the audio compression on the stereo BlueTooth profile will of course be heard clearly. As I said, it is not high end nunmal, but extremely lightweight, small and cheap. For ne mere monitoring solution in my opinion, okay.
There are a few other methods for stereo audio transmission, but those are not the most portable devices. Analog / FM at 868KHz or 2.4MHz eg
Pearl has a little something as synonymous in the range. The c't had tested some time ago, such solutions schonmal.
Much gibts da nunmal not a trend that's just streaming wirelessly terms.
With the power you have to stop what these solutions of MBI himself tinkering. With a little luck goes a camera battery. The other solutions mentioned need to be happy schonmal 12V/1A.
Otherwise: MP3 FM transmitter with pocket radio, then you can listen even more. Only if the will is always the sound that comes out of the camera ... (duck. ..)
- Carsten
Antwort von -sky-:
as it would with an IN-EAR Monitoring Set with a small transmitter and receiver?
Antwort von carstenkurz:
Of which are below about 1000-1500 euro all mono and the channels and nearly as big as the camera-hungry.
If necessary, I can gladly provide a time of cheap Durchschleifaufzeichnung HAMA sets online.
Consider the set of mobile power supply costs including time and is just 30 euros without tinkering to use immediately. Transmitter after charging s.der infected Camera, receiver s.den pinch collar or head phones, headphones on, done. Transmitter and receiver are each about thumb.
For Produktionston course referenztontauglich best, but for monitoring okay.
- Carsten
Antwort von Auf Achse:
Keep in touch!
Thank you for your time Tips! As already mentioned, for me the cable very annoying. This has to do largely synonymous with the nature of my film contracts. These are eg. Events where I once filme half an hour, then a pause is and I put away the camera, then shoot again maybe a couple of minutes, etc. .. all very spontaneous. This is certainly not like in a studio where you can kontinuierich work after work and put away everything.
Before I buy now what I would like to know how you've solved the headphones thing.
Thanks and regards,
Auf Achse
Antwort von carstenkurz:
There are other synonymous, eg here:
http://www.amazon.de/Suvil-Bluetooth-Empf%C3%A4nger-Stereo-Headset/dp/B000S9VWQ4/ref=pd_cp_ce_3_img
But I am quite sure that there drinsteckt the same chipset and the audio quality is the same. That black ;-)
Individual components gibts synonymous example of Sony. Whether the audioqualitativ more I know of no use, in any case, they cost more, and there is some risk when combining with another recipient. With any certainty but the station is crucial for the quality of the audio compression. It is important A2DP support.
Search at Amazon times for Bluetooth, stereo headset, and since there is a lot. Only problem is spoiled for choice ...
What kind of headphones do you use now?
Hama range of my sets is about 4-5m. There is increasing interference dropouts. The devices are found but again at reducing the gap ever without intervention.
Just always have to think with two battery charges. But go easily from the usual 4 * AA USB battery boxes.
More expensive devices supposedly make 10h period, but whether it really ripped open Headphones with A2DP and continuous upward synonymous still true, no idea.
- Carsten
Antwort von newsart:
I think the idea with the HAMA-part genius. My Assi does have a wireless connection of the Angel / mixer to the camera but without any cable channel. That would be a very inexpensive solution.
If you time an audio sample online stele could be that's great. And maybe you can say what the battery runtime.
THANK YOU!
Antwort von deti:
A2DP is not a good solution: The sound quality is significantly worse by the compression and the signal is no longer in real time by far.
Deti
Antwort von carstenkurz:
This is nunmal so good in all digital portable (which are affordable) methods so that delays are there. For monitoring, but I see no big problem, just as with the compression.
We are not talking here about ear monitoring for live musicians.
Can I see some happy when tested on the second channel, the direct sound for an estimate and that the delay can be measured synonymous times. Degree just short estimated time, in any case less than one second.
- Carsten
Antwort von MK:
As a transmitter you can add some of these FM stations with which you feed your MP3 player into the car radio can use. Which have a range of 3 to 9 meters and cost 20 to 30 euros.
As a receiver you can then take an arbitrary small scan the radio clipped to 5, - EUR.
Antwort von carstenkurz:
The constant disruption to make a pretty nervous but when recording, even those things have been tried. Since one has to be tolerable in a dead zone, even if sender and receiver are close together. This is precisely why I switched to what digital.
- Carsten
Antwort von Meggs:
This is nunmal so good in all digital portable (which are affordable) methods so that delays are there. For monitoring, but I see no big problem, just as with the compression.
I would never do. It still comes to the tone control of the recording. At each hum you hear, can advise you whether the coming of the wireless Billigübertragung, or whether it is being recorded so. I do not see any great improvement synonymous with frequent turning intervals.
Antwort von carstenkurz:
We hear no 'hum'. That is just the gimmick, so I have excluded all common analog methods.
If You turn Doku, then runs her always synonymous with Assi nem FullHD monitor from you?
- Carsten
Antwort von Auf Achse:
Keep in touch!
Thanks for the many contributions that would be synonymous for others an interesting topic!
@ Carsten: I would be very interested in the time delay and the sound quality, you could create a confrontation preview with cable / wireless?
Regards,
Auf Achse
Antwort von carstenkurz:
Is quickly done, but if I should put it online I have to make me think about erstmal suitable material, my Abmahnsparschwein is just empty ...
But I think there certainly was.
- Carsten
