Frage von Fairbär:
Hi,
I would like to see soon a professional camcorder, if possible re-growth. Since the time of the break between DV and HDV place, I am absolutely unsure what the right thing for now is.
Perhaps just to the claims:
- The camcorder should be at fairs and for brief interviews and features utilized. These are then streamed on the Internet or published. Possibly (!) Synonymous nature films.
- The price should be, because of my rather meager budgets that fail, do not exceed gross 3000Euro.
- Good image quality in true 16:9 format
- XLR inputs
- Flexible systems with lenses and other essays
- If possible, a long battery life
- Easy on the computer überspielbare recordings (Firewire, USB ..)
- Flexible manual setting possibilities
I have already viewed the Canon XL2, which is now synonymous already 3 years old, the camcorder which I would like to growth, but should the next 4-5years enough.
And here is my question: Is the Canon XL2 is so "outdated", the picture quality is no longer sufficient and just get on an HDV device should be set?
The reports are not supported on any 40 "LCD's running only on the Internet in normal 16:9 streams.
Antwort von Manuell:
Hello,
I stand at a similar problem, although have already XL2, but consider me a second to buy, or to switch to HD.
So the advantage of mini-DV is the possibility of a simple calculator with the material to be able to process and archive on tape.
I use mainly for my XL2 concert shots indoors with and am very satisfied with the camera, but in outdoor shoots I like the picture quality not so good.
On a 50 inch FullHD television, his Picture of a Panasonic Blu Ray player, of my DVD gets burned, the Picture of my concerts, for me, class.
I think the man with the XL2 at least 2 years work very well, but 4 years I do not know, because then some people probably already have HD Television :-)
Now I must admit, but synonymous, that I do not have a comparison with an HD camera and have it say yes All of the SD to HD have changed, that they never again want to back :-)
mfg
Manuel
Antwort von maniero:
Ne new XL2 would probably buy one more, half for the mind is ...
New = HD, or HD Consumer Wahn benefit and a used to ridicule XL2 purchase price, as each Hinz and Kunz says that he is for his semi-semi (pro) wedding videos to HD must change ... ;-) because you can make some bargains.
Antwort von raymaker:
The camera must be in the field of good. And that is the XL2. For interviews and reports, and general TV stuff, the camera (like the XL1S, the XL1 is no longer) very good.
On HD nunmal often grow documentary filmmaker, amateur filmmakers or "Consumer-film" in order.
If the target requires SD or SD ausreizt not, there is nothing. How it looks in the future, but each with their own check.
Antwort von Fairbär:
First, thanks for the replies. That helps me a lot next. :)
I said yes, the whole is not on the large full HD TVs are more likely in the range of online reports and interviews for a few pages and / or fairs.
Unless everyone has at home a 50 "monitor for his calculator.:)
Have ye yet alternatives, where I ultimately get away with would be better?
Antwort von maniero:
...
Have ye yet alternatives, where I ultimately get away with would be better? [/ b] If you do not Komsument and the 50 inch at home, you, the XL2 from thick ...
Antwort von Fairbär:
Now you see the cam such a massive price erosion, that they are even new for 2999Euro to acquire.
Used as you can probably do much more rausholen.
