Frage von Christoph Kirchner:
Dear Slashcam community,
after me the existing posts of this forum (thank the posters!) repeatedly saved their necks, I now own question.
Those who know them of course all the camcorder-comparison thread - why was told in advance that I am diligent Video Aktiv Digital and Slashcam readers bin. The latest market survey of "5000 ¬ HD Cams" I have already looked at. What I now still missing would be some subjective voices / impressions of users who come with the camcorders mentioned experiences.
For a nearly 70 minute documentary (it is a game developer, so for most indoor shots taken - the film is synonymous, however, a certain part of metropolitan s.Natur and recordings posts. For many images there is enough time, appropriate to place the filter color and made other recordings have documented typical fast - here is largely due to the automatic functions (aside from auto) have to leave - will be rotated in HD/25p, possibly with a 35mm adapter, it is but it must be assumed that, for reasons of flexibility will be waived) will I get a camera in the price segment below 5000 ¬ buy. The choice was now closer to the HVX 200 E, the XH A1 E and the HVR-Z1 E. retires from the former, because to me the P2 card system is too expensive. Does the Canon and Sony. Now I have to Slashcam Active Digital Video and clever made: While the A1E in SC performs significantly better, it seems in the VAD exactly the opposite to be. Here, for example, only the sharpness with "satisfactory" assessment, while those in Slashcam test performs significantly better. Admittedly, both in the core test results good, but seems you are in relation to many details not quite agree to.
Therefore now the question: Which Camera did you better (subjective) experience? I have no problem, appropriate settings themselves - however, the Cam a degree s.Flexibilität and offer reliability.
Antwort von Axel:
... is rotated only in HD/25p, possibly with a 35mm adapter, but it is probably assumed that, for reasons of flexibility will be waived). The Z1 may have been no "p". Basically Comparison of repeated only this:
http://forum.slashcam.de/sony-fx1-oder-doch-die-canon-xh-a1--vt57059.html
, With the difference that the Z1 is significantly more expensive, but XLR, Lanc and between 25i and 30i is switchable.
On the Picture has not changed, neither s.der better optics of the Sony (see CA-criticism in the A1 - a problem with 35mm adapter - and focus problems), nor significantly worse s.ihrer resolution (third lower pixel resolution, and another third is by "i" is wasted).
Read the relevant thread, lend you the Cams, decide.
Antwort von Helene:
Well, if 25p will be synonymous würd ich mal ins auge the V1 grasp.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
[quote = "Axel "][... different that the z1 is significantly more expensive, but xlr, Lance and between 25i and 30i switchable ...[/ quote]
Differences between the FX1 and Z1, there's already a whole series, but LANC is not one of them: this connection is synonymous the FX1.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von Christoph Kirchner:
Hi guys,
thanks for the replies. 720p was perhaps something wrong words - primary HD is important, not the "p" in the shortcut. What is special to me (oh wonder!) Is image quality and sharpness - synonymous with photography, the times "must go quickly," but certainly synonymous a degree-and-adjustment s.Einstellungs freedom. Possibly. Cinema is a small part in the evaluation stage. Therefore, the question may be in the following direction: "Cam is the (possibly with 35 items) eureserachtens
kinotauglicher?"
