Frage von rush:
Moin,
here there were already some s.Infos on the innovations of the XH-A1S to the S without :-)
The camcorder comparison test here the XH-A1s in low-light cuts from jedochirgendwie worse ... If the s.Automatikmodus or whatever it comes into existence? Found here somehow not right about this entry on the fly.
The XH-A1s is new so slightly cheaper than the current A1 without s. .. And of my logical mind, I would rather synonymous to tend Camera with S .. or speaks against something? :)
Achso and what it has with the larger firewire port on the camera itself? Is this mechanically for so much better than the small connections, or where there is actually the advantage?
Antwort von nicecam:
That the new model is cheaper synonymous surprised me a little, and probably has the old (Juchhee, I've had ...) already left an aura.
The Lowlightbildern in the database, I do not come across clearly.
hier
Dagegen sieht es There In Comparison
hier
Dagegen sieht es
But I think the slight improvement in handling and in the audio field, rather talk to XHA1s.
If I need something new today, however, I would get my bearings but rather in the direction Tapeless. Although I can always live with the tape still good.
Antwort von rush:
The Lowlightbildern in the database, I do not come across clearly. When Comparison hier fällt der Comparison der beiden Test pictures doch eher zu Gunsten der XH-A1s aus.
Dagegen sieht es then reversed out. For the latter, I have found no permalink.
True - which is synonymous my problem. With me in your first link, the XH-A1
without S appear brighter.
Hach naja not all that easy;) The FX1000 is not synonymous interesting again and what better but without XLR.
Can we use the FX1000 the internal microphone on a track and an extremely attached mic on the other? As with the XH-A1s now possible?
Antwort von nicecam:
With me in your first link, the XH-A1 without S appear brighter. I've lost me as well. However, it was here I think so yes debbatiert times that the test can not readily compare pictures in every case.
