Frage von lxRox:
Hi
what you think.
yes come much cheaper to prof. film / photo objects to use as any p + s adapters. (or so Movietube)
You can compare the quality with the mini35 adapter.
http://www.xl1solutions.com/ADAPTERS.htm
or this brilliant follow focus on the canon xl-series:
http://www.xl1solutions.com/xl1solution.htm
And anyway - how do I find products horny!
someone has experience with it?
And as with the schauts spiegelverkeehrten image from, but here is likely to be synonymous not a problem?
rockon
lxRox
Antwort von melloken:
Hi
if you want to use only other objective that is certainly a good solution. the sense of the p + s Depth of the adapter should be reduced, which with the other adapters but does not happen.
greets melloken
Antwort von lxRox:
but just that it needs so other objective, or deceive myself?
I also find the low tiefenschärfe the xl2 (20xzoom obj.) ja eh pretty mad ...
Antwort von melloken:
Hi
The depth is determined above all by the size of the chips, the greater the less depth of field.
Because the chip can not be changed, he is outwitted. The Picture of Lens where it falls on a Matscheibe of the action is filmed and so reduces the depth of field. Here's how the adapter to the P + S.
In the other adapter, the depth remains the same. If so synonymous in the writable've read Wennichen correct.
Antwort von GhostDog:
The XL-objects are constructed so that they are only projecting the picture on the small 2 / 3 "(?) Chip area of the XL1 / 2. If you are now on the Canon EF adapter normal Canon EOS Lenses s.The XL1 / 2 join, you're automatically in the "Zoom" ... because the little chip just a fraction of the surface covering 35mm that is normally exposed Stillimage of these lenses.
As the depth of field of the surface is dependent on the Picture of the lens is projected, you have no gain.
When mini35 adapter of P + S, however, the picture is projected by the lens on a 35mm ground glass, which in turn of the other by the Camera Page (in the case of the XL1 / 2 by a small-XL is filmed close-up lens).
Entsprechenderweise there is the possibility of camera lenses (eg Canon EOS or Nikon use) with the mini35 on. This requires an appropriate mount (there's of P + S). Makes perfect sense, because photo-optics are far cheaper than expensive PL Primes. For that they are not necessarily of less quality and there is hardly a camera lens for a "follow focus" (at least I still have no generally accepted among the lenders view).
Antwort von GhostDog:
sorry, did little to quickly read over it. Thought it is about the normal "EF adapter" of Canon. What is offered here, next is nothing but a "mechanical" adapter with which you can stop screwing a PL-prime before the XL-1 / 2. The true benefits (especially in relation to the price) but I do not understand. Sure, if you are PL-Primes in the basement then it might make sense to use the synonymous with. But you have the same problems as with photo-optics and the EF-adapter (see previous post) ... And if you can afford your PL-Primes, then you should make synonymous the mini35 no financial difficulties ...
Antwort von Jan:
Hello,
it should only be noted that a Kleinbildobjektiv eg 50 mm with 47 ° Wide Anglebei the 1 / 3 "CCD XL 1 / 2 (counts as one actually Chip's at 3?), the focal and the Wide Anglenicht is the same.
At 1 / 3 ", the conversion factor would therefore be approximately 6 out of 50 mm Small 300 mm Videocam what is good for telephoto, would be fatal in Weiwinkelbereich. Kleinbildfischaugenobjektive are synonymous, since very expensive as eg 8 mm = 48 mm Videocam, the variant would be synonymous very expensive.
With SLR digicam we do expect each day with Nikon D 50, D 70 x 1.5, therefore is from 28 mm format = 42 mm and at Canon 350 D, 20 D x1, 6 = 44.8 mm, as many of your old customers Lenses to your new digicam's stake my wish.
Power of the special adapter stake my more than one? Otherwise there'd be no great sense because of the large conversion factor's.
LG
January
Antwort von lxRox:
Hi,
Well then. If I hear you, so it's not, "the bringer!
But you just look at times of the images that were rotated with various objective. And if I have understood everything correctly, was "28 Days Later" with xl1 ner un rotated as a mechanical adapter.
So it "more film look"?
http://www.xl1solutions.com/AJ.htm
http://www.xl1solutions.com/FrankNikon.htm
http://www.xl1solutions.com/PLPhotos.htm
has anyone of you the dimensions of various mounts, so the mechanic would have to unravel one without problems!
My girlfriend is a photographer and has some great nikon / sigma objective.
würds just like to test in practice.
orig, and the follow focus for it. canon objectively, I'd fall on each
('ve now found one synonymous http://www.cinetechonline.com/ -> synonymous otherwise very nice / expensive products)
rockon
lxRox
Antwort von lxRox:
Nobody has to say more?
(xl1 / 2 user)?
lxRox
Antwort von marius:
Hello!
I do not know if you weiterhilft that, but I'm currently screwing synonymous to find a adapter to EF Lenses s.The XL1 too. Now I am but the original accessories with good part of Canon 400, - Euro a little too expensive. In my research for a much cheaper alternative, I'm - in addition to the possibility of Eigenbaus - not long Did not find anything until I've found the page of the company Novoflex. The offer EF -> an XL1 adapter for 169, - Euro. As I understand it is the same as the original part, is just much cheaper. The conversion factor at SLR lenses s.der XL1 is somewhere, in fact, at a factor of 6 ... Depth is in the telephoto range even synonymous pretty down, and that therefore provide 50mm here already some interesting results. Would experiment with times - times will look like the result. :)
Regards
Marius
Novoflex website: http://www.novoflex.de/html_d/produkte.htm
Antwort von Mausbaer:
It should be noted, however, that you in the use of EOS Obejktiven
with the EF adapter has no autofocus, which makes the work
with the XL1s color viewfinder is not easy doing (sharpness setting manual
with the small viewfinder) is not really funny.
Jochen
