Is this Canon recorded in a position to anamorphic 16:9? (Of course, without Anamorphic!)
Antwort von Commanderjanke:
The Camera is not included in the position since the 16:9 only 4:3 CCD Camera 's has. But a 16:9 mode, but is not a proper 16:9 but a 4:3 picture that has black bars top and bottom (letterbox).
Greetings from the Commander
Antwort von campool:
Thank you!
Antwort von Marco:
Almost. The XL-1 is the "16:9" Although balkenfrei in the correct pixel aspect ratio on, but with a corresponding loss of quality because s.Chip while only 432 lines are scanned vertically, which are extended further back in the Processing of 576 lines. After applying the 16:9 pixel aspect ratio it becomes again a geometrically correct picture.
Technically, after the fixation with the XL-1 in the 16:9 mode synonymous "real" 16:9 signal on the tape, which can be treated appropriately than 16:9 signal to the cut programs / should. But from "normal" PAL 16:9 format, it is distinguished by the loss of resolution of 144 lines.
One could in principle work equally well in the 4:3-programmed later in the editing mode and a 16:9-making cropping, so you have even more flexibility when preparing the 16:9 screen. There remains the argument of who makes the full picture scaling better - the XL-1 or the editing program.
slashCAM benutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch werden teilweise Cookies von Diensten Dritter gesetzt. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr InfosVerstanden!