Frage von BasicMotion:
Hello!
Have I with the Canon XL1 films and the film feeding into MagixVideoDeluxe (; to 4:3), I have a very small frame around the picture around. During the recording, I can see this framework. What's going on? I had nowhere else! First are the XL1. Now I always have to cut this piece, or adjust the picture, because (in the resulting video, avi for example) is the edge synonymous visible. He is only quite small .. s.Screen about 5mm to full screen
how can I solve this problem?
Antwort von nicecam:
During the recording, I can see this framework. Do you mean the picture in the capture tool of MAGIX, or do you see the black border already synonymous with the viewfinder of the XL1?
Modify the title and time to take the word of XL1, then perhaps the B. DeKid jumps depends.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... I had nowhere else! First are the XL1 ... Maybe it had to do with it:
http://forum.slashcam.de/dv-material-canon-xl-1s-hat-nicht-die-volle-breite--vt19542.html
Antwort von BasicMotion:
No, the black frame is only seen in Magix, not in the XL1. Hmm weird .. So whether the XL1 has a different standard than any other 4:3 Cam, and does not recognize the Magix :-)
So I have a frame as soon as I stöpsle the XL1 s.den PC, Magix will open and import the video.
I can see where the frame
It then remains to see if I edited the video. I get the frame only to get away when I picture the little (editing zoom in)
Antwort von robbie:
The frame is probably in his overscannbereich.
So no preference, if you have something on a tv-bildscirm watching.
Antwort von nicecam:
Yes
robbie, overscan can be yes, but easily the thing was really only to tube time.
I still have not got a flat screen TV, is to read but sometimes that's synonymous modern LCD and Plasma TVs at times or even mostly, although work without hardship, with overscan, which one can then turn off sometimes.
I'm sitting here in front of a degree synonymous film that I cut and ask myself often, I must note overscan / underscan? Because I never know where the movie's up and running.
Example: The camera has captured a Picture slightly crooked. I just put are back again, as I in my mail the effect "rotation" applying.
If I'm lucky, and with a 4x3-4x3-production for television, I have no problem. In both the 4x3-16x9 Television as synonymous on the LCD then I see the crooked corners.
So now I must zoom in addition to the cut to the rotation in the movie, I want to take any chances.
Her with the B. DeKid. The Council knew So Basic Motion, in reference to the XL1, title, insert, so as DeKid comes. But may provide the link of Bernd E. and even the solution.
At that time, the problem that I described above was, but probably not yet in sight to the same extent.
Antwort von campool:
Feeds the signal as you're doing? This is not even mentioned! If you do this by analogy, that is out of the RCA composite output of the camera, perhaps in an A / D converter or by capture card directly into the calculator, this is completely normal. If you import via FW, then I am very puzzling phenomenon synonymous ...
Regards, Tim
Antwort von Stelzi:
Hi!
So I worked a lot with the said cam, and exactly the same problem occurred to me synonymous with home. And I'm just starting to work synonymous with MAGIX. I've solved the problem by the use of Adobe Premiere! Recorded, and lo and behold: not even seen a black frame!
I can not tell obs s.der XL1, which is located MAGIX or s.der compatibility (btw always via DV, thus recorded FW). I accept however that it has something to do with the action, because if I've recorded with the XM2 gabs synonymous no frame.
Sorry that I can not really help, so my problem was Premiere ..
MfG Michael
Antwort von srone:
@ Stelzi
With premiere version which has solved your problem?
just speculating about whether the richtigstellung the pixel width of 1.066 times to 1.094 times for adobe, has since changed it?
lg
SRON
Antwort von Stelzi:
So when CS4 gabs certainly worked under no more, I'm synonymous with Pro 3.0 (; CS3), I can not remember me but synonymous s.das problem, but can not guaranteeing it, but as I said, but CS4 gibts no problems , have been working until 2 months ago with the combination!
MfG
Antwort von BasicMotion:
I always play one in DV over Firewire ...
So I constantly for the publishing company producing videos, I can not quickly switch to another editing program even though I have here eeendlich Sony Vegas. But this I must first cope times - this takes time and I just have not yet.
'll Look into whether the said framework is synonymous see in Vegas. Because the videos I are currently producing for the Internet. So, no tube boxes ;-)
Antwort von sebherrmann:
My XL1 synonymous hatt always made a black border. Have the materials, therefore, always scaled to 102%. But then they had fewer opportunities synonymous. Today is indeed the Adobe Media Encoder be synonymous configured so that the black border will be cut off.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Progi times such as Capture Virtualdub or test one of the others here on unteranderm Slashcam Freeware Capture Progis.
A black frame is my perso. not yet encountered.
I would have guessed the first time now nen filter edge shading.
But having been here designate this as a problem in some Magix first time I'd really back access to other capture software.
If Magix perhaps as a 768x576 picture then make'd give it an edge but only really s.den pages.
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von sebherrmann:
Do correct me synonymous: synonymous with me only s.den pages ...
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Then it could be really Magix as indicating 768x576 / accept ... But other people should be synonymous with SD material that has Prob.
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von WoWu:
If he has 788) as (Q project setting and the camera delivers only 702, then he would have to have the edges.
I'm assuming that it comes with IR 601, 720 Pixels (H) from the camera, so no boundary then arise even with a (Q) 768 setting because it already noticeable when capturing.
@ Basic Motion
Check doch mal your project setting. It should be 788 x 576th
And leaving you not to specify such as PAL. Which is false in 90% of all applications.
