Logo Logo
/// 
Xl1 XL1s XM2

Xl1 XL1s XM2



Frage von dnk:
Februar 2006

Hello.

After several inquiring as a newcomer here, I must ask but one question.
Is it true that the XM2 is now better or as good as the XL1? How it looks with the XL1s?
It's not about manipulation, or the like, interests me only the quality of the result (of the post-apart).

Thank you very much

dnk



Antwort von Markus:

Hello,

The XL1s is an improved successor to the XL1. The XL2 is indeed again a development of XL1s, but it brings not only advantages but also synonymous with new cons.

In this context, you will surely make a article from the journal



Antwort von prem:

you could betray us vielelciht in 2-3 sentences what was there in it??

Greeting
ULY








Antwort von Markus:

I need to dig up the article again until ... (give a little with time). ;-)

What is striking to me just yet that I have misunderstood the title line appears: Since X is not M 2 and X L 2 Is that correct? It's about the XM2?



Antwort von dnk.:

Yes, correct. It's about the x M in the ratio of XL1s.
The article is still very interesting. It is essentially synonymous so that the XL1s as compared with the XL2 in most cases 4:3 s was somewhat better.
But overall, the XL2 comes off very well.
But the thing with the XL2 and XL predecessors me interested yet. Contributions are not really clear I find ...



Antwort von Markus:

Okay, here's the summary from the PC video:

XL2 vs. XL1s

The improvements g s:
+ 16:9 wide-screen with 962x576 pixels
+ 25 frames progressive
+ 20X Zoom with 1000-mm telescopic
+ Markedly sharper picture resolution
+ Available 2-inch display as a viewfinder
+ 15 picture set in the Custom preset
+ Extensive skin tone Blur
+ Two XLR microphone jacks installed
+ All four audio channels individually pegelbar
+ Focus and zoom preset
+ Free-Run-Time Code
+ Hard disk recording via firewire

The new disadvantages:
- 4:3-format uses only half of the CCD
- 4:3-format provides only 51 mm wide
- In low light flauer, noisy colors
- About 1000 ¬ more expensive



Antwort von molch:

Hi,
The XL1S is stop already somewhat obsolete.
the CCDs do not have the full PAL resolution, the picture is blurred and muddy.
http://arco.acromedia.de/mini70/variante3.jpg

Moreover, the s.den xl side has black stripes, as shown in the picture is.
you can not see on the television, but on average it can annoy with some visual transitions.

advantages of the XL1S is the professional handling arranging schultercam design in public for attention, therefore, one feels after a time by himself like a benefit, you can use interchangeable lenses and the true cam master Full image recording.



Antwort von d.n.k.:

It says yes for something. Thank you.
M 2 is the X better, or have to go there one thing you have on XL2?
In concrete terms would, apart from the price and the Exchangeable optics, worth a XL1s instead of a XM2 yet?



Antwort von Theo Rettisch:

Hello.
The last point I would be interested synonymous times, cut off just like a XL1s in Comparison to the XM2. Where the differences are advantages and disadvantages. So are priced around 500-800 ¬ between the two camcorders. Is there somewhere sample clips, made with a XL1s was? Thanks to you ... Theo.



Antwort von molch:

http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/av/docs/20010822/zooma23.htm for the XL1S

http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/av/docs/20020717/zooma68.htm
The xm2

I can sharpen the enthusiasm of the XL1S is not easy and if one does not necessarily progressive recording, I think we should resort to xm2 day to day.
But really crunchy, I find the picture is not synonymous ...
I think for the typical "hammer-the-ist-geil" it needs a quality of Sony VX2100.
but can be difficult to find visual examples.

said that, however, that both cams are definitely bad for 16:9.



Antwort von Markus:

The thread even said so:




Antwort von molch:

I have not written FEW examples:-D.
And the whole is indeed turned into an anamorphic lens to the closure discussion.

But here you get what the VX2000 (or rather the pd150):
http://eric.descarpentri.free.fr/images/








Antwort von d.n.k.:

I fell because another one aspect.
If man is now set to film look, you would get with the Opjektiv the XL1s to not be a better depth of field? She has only synonymous still the larger chip, right?
Can you play around with the Optics not synonymous generally better "than the XM? Or ultimately brings nothing.
The New XM2 lies synonymous with almost 2000, - and occasionally you may even have the option of a used XL1s in the same segment ...



Antwort von Jan:

Hello you,

The XL 1 S has a lot more manual options for more professional applications (indicating a prof. Company):

Custom preset
[image control in 4 different types: farbamplitude farbphase, selective value can be in black and up to 13 steps to choose and store locations on 3]

" Custom Keys
[to 2 buttons can be saved individually and retrieve functions 2 of 9]

" Zebra Pattern
[settings in 5 steps possible]

" White Balance
[manual memory centers on 3]

" Gain Control
[available in 7 steps, -3 to +30 dB]

" Zoom Speed
[s.griff: variable, slow, medium, fast s.handgriff;: slow, medium, fast]

" Clear Scan
[for the capture of as PC monitors (51.7 hz - 200hz])

16:9 " Guide-Line
[shows part of the non-imageable 4:3 recordings, which can be converted to 16:9]

" Interval Recording
[for recordings in zeitraffer]

" Color Bar
[ebu-normfarbbalken]

" Character Studio
[to record data of year, month, day, hour, minute, second]

" 5 Program AE modes
[Full Auto, auto mode, spotlight, blinded, time]

" Shutter [1/6s - 1/16.000s]

" Aperture
[adjustable in 28 steps (f1.6 - closed)]

" AE Lock
[fixed the exposure]

" AE shift
[enable in 13 steps one under-or overexposure - +2.0 to -2.0]

" Power Save
Choices [2: shut-off: head drum stops, does not run next vcr: head drum stops, gets run next]

Additional features of the 3-chip 1 / 3 inch CCD (320,000 pixels) digital camcorder, the possibility still pictures, a multi-color viewfinder with 180,000 pixels and built-in sports viewfinder and an IEEE 1394 DV terminal with DV - In and analog line-in. The basic version of the XL-1S with is the new, improved 16x zoom lens XL delivered 5,5-88 mm IS II.

The compact housing of the XL1S is made of a magnesium alloy which gives the camera despite their low weight, the stability twenty times the conventional camcorder. He himself is playing the toughest professional applications has grown. The slim design allows comfortable shooting with shoulder pad. The outer shell of the camera consists of a single casting, which provides optimum protection.

Clear Scan

The Clear Scan feature allows the choice between 51.7 Hz - 200 Hz, which gives the user the ability camcorder s.The Buckley frequency of the moving image as the PC screen to adapt, and overcome the flicker thus far.

Zebra Pattern

The zebra patterns are identified that bright areas in the Picture, which would lead to overexposure and require correction. In these areas in the viewfinder will be overlaid with a diagonal stripe pattern when their brightness is 80 / 85 / 90 95 / 100 IRE (adjustable in 5 steps beyond). They serve as guidelines for the recruitment of Aperture and shutter speed.

Three recording methods

A highlight of the XL-1S three different recording methods:
" Normal movie mode - for normal video recordings
" Frame Movie Mode - with record of 25 full pictures per second for extremely sharp "freeze" shots.
" Photo mode - perfect for digital stills. The camera features while each still image for about six seconds long. During this time the sound recording system for comments is available. With available accessories than Stillimage-Canon EX-series flash unit from the XL can be used as a standard Small-1S SLR camera. The combination of three recording chip and pixel shift ensures superior digital picture quality. When using the XL-1S as a digital Stehbildkamera can be more than 500 images on a single tape accommodated (over 800 in the LP mode).

So a lot of manual functions, which are synonymous larger CCD 1 / 3 "to 1 / 4".

Well everyone should decide whether this is needed .....

LG
January



Antwort von rote kiwi:

hey DNK,
myself am not a technology per ... but have about 1 year worked regularly with the XM2 and they'd call nice allrounder, but not more!
were really excited, neither I nor anyone else ... but there s.set synonymous nothing to complain about.
S.configurieren myself am just a new computer systems and'll definitely no longer work for XM2 ...
'm between XL1s and XL2, and I'll continue to rotate more 16:9 and thus the good XL1s probably the worst of it ...

cheers
red kiwi




Antworten zu ähnlichen Fragen:
Canon XL1 und XM1
EOS-Objektiv an XL1: auch mit VL-EX-adapter?
Vorstellung und 4K Nachfolger für Canon XM2
Canon XM2 oder Sony DCR-VX2100 oder Panasonic NV-GS400EG-S
Fragen zu Panasonic NV-GS400 und Canon XM2

















weitere Themen:
Spezialthemen


16:9
AI
ARD
AVCHD
AVI
Adobe After Effects
Adobe Premiere Pro
After effects
Apple Final Cut Pro
Audio
Avid
Avid Media Composer
Cam
Camcorder
Camera
Canon
Capture
Capturing
Clip
EOS
Editing
Effect
Error
Export
File
Files
Film
Final Cut
Format
Formate
HDR
Import
JVC
Layer
Light
MAGIX video deLuxe
Magix
Microphone
Monitor
Movie
PC
Panasonic
Pinnacle
Pinnacle Studio
Player
Premiere
RAM
RED
Recording
Red
Software
Sony
Sound
Studio
TV
Tape
Video
Videos