Frage von Mr.Wolf:
Zeiss lens buy now or wait to nab?
Antwort von domain:
Can you buy unconditionally forever. When lenses are not changed so quickly ;-) \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cimg alt=\
Antwort von WoWu:
Ensure that the coating's because old Lenses usually have no, or only very inadequate coating, because there was noReflektion from the film. \u003cbr /\u003e This is different in sensors. \u003cbr /\u003e Reflected there, the filter surface and it can in no lenses Entspieglung come Ghoasting.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von domain:
I wanted to express with my ironical contribution synonymous. \u003cbr /\u003e But WoWu a very interesting chapter has touched on. \u003cbr /\u003e The old uncoated Lenses offer in some cases, truly a special visual effect. First, it is not really sharp, furthermore, they provide in the rule, a low contrast performance, so that one is approaching the car the soft S-log profiles and thirdly, they conjure up grand cause internal reflections and lens flare, all very suitable for atmospheric shots.
Antwort von Mr.Wolf:
I have to buy from me, the Carl Zeiss Distagon T * 2/35 and then the \u003cbr /\u003e Carl Zeiss Planar T * 1,4 / 50. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Now I'm just not sure if in the time to shoot for what NAB is doing with regard Lenses. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Otherwise I would be interested if the PA or the IF for Canon for Nikon Mount is the better film?
Antwort von WoWu:
However, I would go as far as not to compare a poor MTF with an S-curve sign. \u003cbr /\u003e It's as if you lack power with upscale comfort in the pedestrian-founded.
Antwort von Mr.Wolf:
I just want some reasonable objective for the film and I can take long to use without me in NEM year again everything must sell as regards any mount problem which always synonymous. \u003cbr /\u003e I also want to take photographs for them synonymous. \u003cbr /\u003e prio film but
Antwort von domain:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von Mr.Wolf:
Do not Distract of my Question, I care about. :-)
Antwort von domain:
Please do not be evil, but if yours is something important, then you will have to learn synonymous to clarify the initial question ever. Or should we all know, car, what are you actually had in view?
Antwort von WoWu:
That should be synonymous noAblenkung. \u003cbr /\u003e You must know that the use of lenses in the video / sensor area but rather strongly of different a film-based use. \u003cbr /\u003e Some differences are listed above leads already. Another problem is added. \u003cbr /\u003e Blurring in the image lead to a significantly higher requirement a.Fully engage the following codec. \u003cbr /\u003e If you like to say those fallen slightly blurred images, you will come to the overall result is not around. \u003cbr /\u003e So you will have to adapt the Lenses times and have seen everything that they do (and what not). \u003cbr /\u003e My tip is synonymous to make identical shots with the old and modern HD Objectively. \u003cbr /\u003e If you see the images side by side in the split-screen viewing, differences are pretty much a surprise. \u003cbr
Antwort von Bernd E.:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von Mr.Wolf:
So without time to make advertisement that is recommended. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e
