Frage von baerfot:
hello dear Slashcam,
So have just completed a composition in s.gerendert (lossless, best qualified)
when I look now but the final rendered video (power dvd, vlc player, wmplayer), it is fully slow, so around half ..
hab tau why not?
I have since rendered the video again, for example, edit in premiere?
thanks you
lg
Antwort von HansMaulwurf:
If we do not compress the video? Jerky `s` s hooks or run `s really only half as fast? SD or HD?
Antwort von baerfot:
hello dear Slashcam,
So have just completed a composition in s.gerendert (lossless, best qualified)
when I look now but the final rendered video (power dvd, vlc player, wmplayer), it is fully slow, so around half ..
hab tau why not?
I have since rendered the video again, for example, edit in premiere?
thanks you
lg Öhm, well, then rat times why it's compressed format there. If each x-arbitrary Calculator uncompressed clips could easily play would suddenly half the Manufacturer with compression software and hardware go broke because there is no longer a need for doing so ... That is not so, but you should have at least reflection. Search the web look for terms such as codec, data rate, etc., then you have come to enlightenment. Small tip for last: WMV gives you everything you need to appear.
Mylenium
Antwort von baerfot:
Hello
no, did not compress the video - am on komposition-> create movie-> render gone
best qualified and lossless
the final rendered video has a running time of 1 min and 2gb is great!
in s.läufts at normal speed
Antwort von baerfot:
Have you distributed the brake?
Antwort von HansMaulwurf:
Leg überleg stop times. One minute two GB. That is the name of a movie 90minütiger would need 180GB. Ne normal DVD has 4.7 GB, a brand new scheiss expensive Blu-ray creates about 50 GB. There could be something not right, right?
So short and scarce: Use the h264 codec, MPG2 or blu-ray in AE, freu dich that it works and then investing ten minutes to "codec" to Google and to understand why everything is great.
