Frage von ct.g:
Hello,
I have even a little leisure in the forum.
I want to buy me a camera I used to do the recording of lectures and their presentation using beamer and on the internet (eg you tube website and want to use.
nem was now with sellers on the JVC GZ-MS 120 spoken.
the camera is roughly synonymous with what I would like to print out.
jemend can tell me what `s still camera could ask?
un what should I look?
lg
ct.g
Antwort von tommyb:
Basically, you can each SD (standard definition) camera take. The quality should be sufficient slack for YouTube.
EXCEPT
You absolutely want to use HD 720p and the function of YouTube. Then you come to the newer HD equipment is not over.
Antwort von ct.g:
thank ever,
synonymous, it is no preference when I look at the "movies" of events in a good beamer to approximately 1.5 x 1 m canvas would like to present?
720p on the function must be clever, I still do.
to disclose his complete layman, I am :-)
gruß
ct.g
Antwort von tommyb:
synonymous, it is no preference when I look at the "movies" of events in a good beamer to approximately 1.5 x 1 m canvas would like to present? When people sit 15 meters away, then you can even take VHS Camera;)
Of course, this is not no preference and are an HD-capable camera their raison d'être.
Furthermore, it is not necessarily of detriment to shoot in HD and SD runterzuskalieren.
The only issue on which one makes the choice of storage medium, which is not mandatory but often also determines in what format the video will be stored. Depending on the requirements grow s.den average PC.
In principle you can now choose between
HDV and AVCHD
HDV is a little longer on the market, has a native resolution of 1440x1080 (; but with 1920x1080), is based on MPEG2 and is with a middling PC of 2008 quite well processable. HDV is synonymous in most cases recorded on MiniDV cassettes, which means that the material must be only in the calculator will be recorded in real time for it to start with the cut.
AVCHD is still not as long on the market that is hard, but rather on memory cards (; Secure Digital) and is recorded in my opinion rather s.Anwender to turn their material and not necessarily after großartig want to edit (except gaaanz gently rumschneiden ).
AVCHD is with a very efficient compression codec (; h.264) and requires only to play the 1920x1080 pixels on the PC has the full power of the middling PC of 2008 (that is, however, estimated).
Will you cut AVCHD, so you need just a middling PC from the year 2011/2012. Should read: barely liquid editing without the material previously in a less strongly compressed material to convert - this therefore no advantage over the usual capture with an HDV camera.
The HDV segment is not as big as of AVCHD, however, are some wonderful HDV cameras to be anything where as the Canon HV30 of falls. Alternatively there is the SONY HDR HC-9 which also has its charms, for reasons such as the green NightShot (for example, P * rnofilmchen). These cameras, however, are all more expensive in comparison to
AVCHD cams. There are also some of Canon beautiful parts such as the HF10 or the HF100 of CANON. Just draw the same stupid AVCHD to ...
Antwort von ct.g:
hallo thank you very much,
very invormatiev.
Now I've read that the HV30 is not so good sound quality seems to have.
how do you see das
so what can at such a price be?
I thought s.ca. 300.00 euros or so.
lg
ct.g
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... good sound quality ... One, in fact, very important point! You can so badly Talks with the built-in Microphone record, neither the space nor thought is - unless you ask the camera to the lectern ...
Therefore, you should at the camera selection, make sure it has a microphone input, so you have an external Microphone on s.die Camera? can. And of course, is something of a micro budget s.für, cable and - necessarily - an Headphones.
Mach in case of doubt, rather than swabs s.der image s.Sound: An HD picture with a weak, noisy or otherwise abnormal sound is an affront, an SD picture with clear contrast to human intelligible sound worlds better.
Antwort von unodostres:
I use the HV30 for similar purposes. With a good external microphone (I use a directional microphone) and a little basic know-how how to edit sound files in general should be (; Compressor, DeEsser, EQ) gets you a perfectly usable, good ionqualität.
Antwort von ct.g:
I've read the HV 30 very good images do.
ok
but let me just as mentioned in the main have a very good sound quality.
good visual technique synonymous, I believe to be important but need not sooo good. as I said the budget is not very high.
external microphone seems important to me the lights.
cables, etc. to come.
because as I said I'm hardly familiar (what is sure will change) in this area I really need the equipment synonymous layman like me can easily operate without großartig with bearbeitungspogrammen bets. (or should I in any instance with einplannen)? ask for more help regarding cheap, determination equipments
Thank you
Antwort von unodostres:
To have good sound quality style you like I said in any case, something dealing with the issue.
On a voice recording is always DeEsser, Compressor and then dan Freuencen with the EQ to adjust so that it sounds good.
Antwort von maremiru:
Hello,
I've just registered in this thread and in a XLR s.consumer camcorders participate.
basically I have a similar plan: stativ recordings of lessons and interviews with studio conditions, good (for the deliverable) to moderate (flash video) IMAGE quality for the web, but excellent sound quality.
I therefore ask for my contribution "speaker": there is software, even open source, to DeEsser, compressor, eq. someone knows how to do that with (what) video editing software can combine?
then my question to the long outstanding contribution to AVCHD and desen kritisablen Editable: why not simple - for the settings of the threads - a DIRECT CAPTURING make in MPEG2 or, if it exists in FLASH or QUICKTIME.
Pity that there is no flash in the record, or is that "around the corner"?
Viele Gruesse, Michael
