Frage von penance:
Hi.
I'm quite new here in the area of your camcorder.
I want to buy me my first and 'I'm on synonymous manual white balance and other things informed raff but one thing I still do not:
What is it now better? 3ccd chips with 800,000, respectively 1CCD with eg 3 megapixels? Or rather .. when the television signal so eh .. used only 400,000 for what then 3 megapixels? Only for pictures? No, that can not be yes (which told me that is) one from the Sony support. And higher Resolutionist thus also not in it.
So I have the following questions:
1. What bring me the "more" pixels in principle? For what are they used?
2. 3ccds jew with 0.8 MP or 1CCD with such 3MP .. Which is better?
3. . .. and to point two intersects the other hand, how deliver an 1CCD-cam with 0.8 MP? Is it then so much worse?
For an answer I would be very grateful. Because I can not find intelligent reports thereon. = P
Greetings, penance
Antwort von AndyZZ:
I'll try once ...
To 1
The "More is s.Pixeln" function with 1 CCD cameras for the built-in photo, and used for the electronic image stabilization. Here the picture is in fact out on the chip "and hergerutscht" so that the recorded signals is again wackelärmer.
to 2
In general 3CCD be better, since each one chip for each primary color (RGB: red, green, blue) in charge. Broken, the light on a prism. Means that the Resolutioneiner 3CCD camera will theoretically always better than the one 1CDD Camera.
to 3
see 2 The Picture of 1CCD Camera with 0.8 MP is not in the video function to be worse than the picture of a 1CCD Camera with 3 MP. (Exceptions prove the rule).
Now there's a little BUT:
Some cameras have a built-in 16:9 wide-screen function. A true widescreen can be recognized, that widens the viewing angle! A broader picture is of course synonymous taken only by a larger chip. Is then stored again in 720x576 pixels, although the upset, however, are and will be rectified during play back on full widescreen.
Recommendation:
If you can function without the photo, then see that you have a 3CCD camera purchase. They can take pictures but mostly synonymous, but come across as a rule, no more than 1.3 MP.
Hope I could reasonably explain in brief ...
Greeting
Andy
PS:
here's a link relating to:
http://forum.slashcam.de/technologie-3ccd-vs-1ccd-vt28078.html?highlight=chipgr% F6% DFe
Antwort von penance:
Hi! Thanks for the quick reply.
Hm, that is really mostly just play the megapixel photos for a role .. tja this is not lucrative for me. Then fetch me, I still prefer 'intelligent ne digicam .. which is so synonymous smaller. =)
So I'll probably look for 'ner of 3 ccd lookout.
How good is because the electronic image stabilization in Comparison to optical? I always read that a camcorder conjure with less megapixels, but optical image stabilization, in any case, the better picture. Is the extra cost for gerechtgertigt in your opinion?
What can you recommend me under 1000 ¬? ;)
Greetings, penance
Antwort von Kiara Borini:
to 3
see 2 The Picture of 1CCD Camera with 0.8 MP is not in the video function to be worse than the picture of a 1CCD Camera with 3 MP. (Exceptions prove the rule).
It may even be worse, because the same chip size, more pixels means smaller pixels always synonymous. But that usually means more noise synonymous with bad light.
Generally 3CCD (or 3CMOS have - yes, there is now synonymous) always "shocking" pixels have little, if an optical Stbilisator. That does not detract from the quality but rather the reverse can not be - so frighten. These models are, however, generally more expensive than models with electronic image stabilization.
1CCD models are much cheaper and often provide less "realistic" colors because they do not need a color sensor for each pixel, but the masked out from the neighboring cells.
In practice, the upper 1CCD models but are very useful. Because the data-compression of color information will be lost anyway, the difference is smaller than one might initially think. Nevertheless, one can certainly see it in direct Comparison! Often, the 1CCD models but an advantage in smaller size, synonymous when the boundaries become blurred.
When the pixel numbers that come up on the tape, however there is no difference. They are standardized at the same DV, HDV, as in the different image sizes. Since no one cook a Extrasüppchen. Therefore, a (H) DV video camera images in greater quality than the video standard
can accommodate only if it is written to a flash memory. The format of the tape will not let him.
The trend in the "Stillimage video Wollmilchsäuen" at the moment seems to be the hard drive storage, such as in JVC's Everio models. Although it has since opted for a MPEG2 video standard. But in principle, such a camera can read and write at the same time the sensor video - and photo data in two different qualities on the same medium. Only the signal processors share the still limited. In principle, such a product could write a synonymous video data in DV or HDV codec. With today's hard drive when traveling and needed only 13 gigabyte per hour they would come in the 1.8 inch Festpaltten become almost synonymous to three hours non-stop. With the top open future border.
That this is not done, has probably mostly Marektinggründe. And maybe is synonymous in the utilization of production lines. Otherwise I do not understand that will get the new Canon XL H1 without at least one removable cartridge hard drive module ";-)
But this is actually a new thread ...
Antwort von GhostDog:
Hi.
Thanks for your reply .. But somehow nothing had to do with my last question!? ;)
Is there anyone else rüberschrieben me some info?
Antwort von Jan:
Hello,
Kiara is exactly why VX 2100 with 3x 1 / 3 "CCD 540,000 pixels and ever I think better in low light than an overlying XL 2 with 3x 1 / 3" per 800,000 pixels which is noticed in many magazines.
Here has been much discussion about your class:
sony-DCR-HC32-42-90-or-like Lg
January
Antwort von vspec2:
hy
So if you are looking for a 3 CCD cam with optical image stabilization and super quality under 1000 euro I would GS250EG the Panasonic NV-S nehmen.Ich to think for a better price you get a new 3 Chipper with optical image stabilization to price it. hew (@ all: Do not ask if I was mistaken)
On the subject of optical image stabilization, I had some time previously had a Canon of this, even at maximum zoom you could make recordings in a quiet single-handed operation thanks to the floating lens :-))
I fands super!
Antwort von Markus:
Questions about 3CCD/1CCD were discussed last month in the following contribution:
