Frage von brendan:
hello together,
for O-tones I want a possibility to make this wirelessly to a cable rumbaumelt less. the operating range must not be large.
what systems exist there?
happy to supplement an existing microscopic (ME-66)
LG-brendan
Antwort von domain:
In my opinion, because you will not be able to avoid a Sennheiser G3 system. Which reaches 50 meters and a relaxed nice feature: either the sound is good without being disturbed or has he falls in the border area completely, so obviously digitally encoded.
Quite different for pure UHF frequency modulated systems, because there are all intermediates of noise depending on the distance, simply impossible.
Antwort von brendan:
naj a distance of about 80cm to be synonymous but a low-cost location analogues do their service.
've looked at ebay for grad sennheisser g3, there seems to be a major recipient of the box ... I seek to fix what little s.der cam .. and then to a micro
Antwort von deti:
In my opinion, because you will not be able to avoid a Sennheiser G3 system. Which reaches 50 meters and a relaxed nice feature: either the sound is good without being disturbed or has he falls in the border area completely, so obviously digitally encoded.
Quite different for pure UHF frequency modulated systems, because there are all intermediates of noise depending on the distance, simply impossible. To my knowledge there are no Sennheiser of digital radio link. The G3 series, works just like the previous model series, with a broadband analog frequency modulation - FM radio with similar technology, but just mono with pilot tone.
Deti
Antwort von brendan:
for something like 444th -
http://www.musikhaus-korn.de/Samson-Airline- video combination system wireless Systems__sca16230.aspx
.. but looks for "cheap out"
Antwort von mbwkrause:
The problem is not that it looks cheap, but that it sounds cheap. You need something like this: http://www.thomann.de/de/sennheiser_ew_112p_g3dband.htm
Otherwise I would look used after a well-preserved G2 set, then you save maybe 200-250 ¬ ...
Antwort von brendan:
ok ..
the sender and receiver are therefore relatively outwardly identical? but I would like to have a micro in the hand, so a micro-radio transmitter or as a Mljet walking in an XLR adapter ... Otherwise the kästchen yes still synonymous to the micro?
edit: something like this:
http://cgi.ebay.de/SENNHEISER-SKP-500-G2-PlugOnSender-EK-500-G2-Empfanger-/130426669572?pt=DE_Elektronik_Computer_Audio_Hi_Fi_Mikrofone&hash=item1e5e090a04
n whole chunk more expensive but is
maybe there is synonymous cheap funk-microscopic
Antwort von deti:
ok ..
the sender and receiver are therefore relatively outwardly identical? but I would like to have a micro in the hand, so a micro-radio transmitter or as a Mljet walking in an XLR adapter ... Otherwise the kästchen yes still synonymous to the micro? That's why you need this set: http://www.thomann.de/de/sennheiser_ew_100_eng_g3eband.htm
Make sure you take an E-tape set, because the D-tape is approved for only a short time officially.
Deti
Antwort von brendan:
exactly this:
http://cgi.ebay.de/Sennheiser-EW-135-P-G2-D-/200515613524?pt=DE_Elektronik_Computer_Audio_Hi_Fi_Mikrofone&hash=item2eafa97354
but that is probably D-tape, if the D to G 2 in the name for the band is ...
EW 135 is the one predecessor or what is the difference?
the set here would be more comfortable with, one hand and a micro receiver, no lavender micro, therefore, probably cheaper.
http://www.thomann.de/de/sennheiser_ew_135_p_g3_e_band.htm
Antwort von deti:
EW 135 is the one predecessor or what is the difference?
the set here would be more comfortable with, one hand and a micro receiver, no lavender micro, therefore, probably cheaper. You have already recognized the difference - there are just a handful of different sets of Sennheiser. You have to know what you'd like, although the pins are already a very good thing (if one does not exactly street interviews).
Deti
Antwort von bgk:
Hi Brendan,
in the next forum is just about
