Frage von Helmut Hullen:
Hello all together,
if I have several *. mpg files (split due to file size) with
PVAstrumento one together and summarize the result as the other
one *. mpv and *. mpa file and then will output the *. mpv and *. mpa -
File mplex1 again with a single *. mpg file summary: is
the information loss associated with?
Background: I can then delete the original files?
Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
Antwort von Wolfgang Barth:
Helmut Hulle wrote:
>
> If I have several *. mpg files (split due to file size) with
> PVAstrumento one and the other summarized the result as
> One *. mpv and *. mpa file and then will output the *. mpv and *. mpa -
> File mplex1 again with a single *. mpg file summary: is
> The information loss associated with?
No loss regarding video - and audio quality.
It may be that you, not all audio tracks into reinmuxt result.
It may be that loss of information regarding sensitive information such as
Subtitle, ... occur.
>
> Background: I can then delete the original files?
I'm always so. The additional information does not interest me.
However, do you quite cumbersome.
With ProjectX is a step including the rough cut.
(Issue m2p then rename in mpg.)
mfgwb
Antwort von Helmut Hullen:
Hello Wolfgang,
You s.04.04.09 my test:
>> If I have several *. mpg files (split due to file size) with
>> PVAstrumento one and the other summarizing the results
>> As one *. mpv and *. mpa file and then will output the *. mpv and
>> *. Mpa file with mplex1 return to a single *. mpg file
>> Summarize the information loss associated with?
> No loss regarding video - and audio quality.
Ok - then I can tidy up a bit.
> However, do you quite cumbersome.
> With ProjectX is a step including the rough cut.
Meanwhile, I have found that
PVAstrumento
Cuttermaran
cut, muxen
reasonably so in one go to work (PVAstrumento meets
Cuttermaran to, and may be synonymous Cuttermaran muxen).
Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
Antwort von Josef Moellers:
Wolfgang Barth wrote:
> Helmut Hulle wrote:
>>
>> If I have several *. mpg files (split due to file size) with
>> PVAstrumento one and the other summarizing the results
>> Alsje a *. mpv and *. mpa file and then will output the *. mpv and
>> *. Mpa file with mplex1 return to a single *. mpg file
>> Summary: istdas associated with loss of information?
> No loss regarding video - and audio quality.
>
> It may be that you, not all audio tracks into reinmuxt result.
> It may be that loss of information regarding sensitive information such as
> Subtitles, ... occur.
>>
>> Background: I can then delete the original files?
> I machs always so. The additional information does not interest me.
>
> However, do you quite cumbersome.
> With ProjectX is a step including the rough cut.
> (Output m2p then rename in mpg.)
As they have with muxt PX? I use only for Demultiplexing and lead
Then the interesting parts of me back together with mplex (a
Perl script evaluates the log-file of PX and looking out as the best
Soundtrack)!
--
These are my personal views and not those of Fujitsu Technology Solutions!
Josef Möllers (penguin keeper at FTS)
If failure had no penalty success would not be a prize (T. Pratchett)
Company Details: http://de.ts.fujitsu.com/imprint.html
Antwort von Wolfgang Barth:
Josef Moellers wrote:
>>
>> But do you fairly cumbersome.
>> With ProjectX is a step including the rough cut.
>> (Output m2p then rename in mpg.)
>
> How it because muxt with PX? I use only for Demultiplexing and lead
> Then I am interested in the parts back together with mplex (a
> Perl script evaluates the log-file of PX and looking out as the best
> Soundtrack)!
>
I have not said that you can muxen with ProjectX.
But you can not demuxte mpg multiple files in one go
join, roughly cut and re-save and the latter is synonymous
in any of the "portions" of eg 650 MByte.
I made that very often with DVB-S transport stream files (. Ts) from the
Dreambox. The box stores the files in blocks of 2 GB, which I
the PC. Here I select multiple files then these as "input"
from coarsely cut (only goes sB-frames), and then save as
m2p. This goes in a Aufwasch without de-and remuxen and although sauschnell
with about 30000 sec n.pro m2p Then just rename in mpg.
wb mfg
Antwort von Dennis Reinhardt:
404ERR
Antwort von Wolfgang Hauser:
Dennis Reinhardt wrote:
> Wolfgang Barth wrote:
>
>> I'm always so. The additional information does not interest me.
>>
>> But do you fairly cumbersome.
>> With ProjectX is a step including the rough cut.
>> (Output m2p then rename in mpg.)
>>
>> Mfgwb
>
> Are you by chance a tool with which the transport stream of DVB-S2
> Recordings cope? So H.264 Sound (file extension = loud Digicorder
*. TS4).
Avidemux TSRemux and should be able, at least in the former
one go synonymous rough cut and format conversion offers.
> ProjectX TS4 seems neither the files nor the gemuxten to like it.
Project X is how many older tools around the digital TV only
with MPEG bypass.
Antwort von Dennis Reinhardt:
Wolfgang Hauser wrote:
> Avidemux TSRemux and should be able, at least in the former
> One go synonymous rough cut and format conversion offers.
Therefore, the files from the receiver to throw TSremux? There comes a *. m2ts
out, it is synonymous with MPC to play halfway, but no other
Program opens the file, I think all the waiting and MPEG2
not MPEG4.
I install avidemux straight, according to the website can be synonymous MPEG4, times
see if the files can open. :)
In MPEG2 it's much easier ... DVD data in open DVD2AVI
and in case of doubt, without a convert after Vdub frameserven. Does the
not similar with MPEG4 practicable?
> Project X, as many older tools around the digital TV only
> With MPEG bypass.
Jo, already noticed. Media Port (The client of copying data to Technisat
Videos to / from the receiver rauszukopieren) is used for SD conversion
synonymous ProjectX parts, HD conversion is well aware of not synonymous.
:) Is a form of copy protection synonymous when nix with the raw data to start
can ... :)
Gruß, Dennis
Antwort von Wolfgang Barth:
Dennis Reinhardt wrote:
>> With ProjectX is a step including the rough cut.
>> (Output m2p then rename in mpg.)
>>
> Are you by chance a tool with which the transport stream of DVB-S2
> Recordings cope? So H.264 Sound (file extension *. Digicorder loud TS4).
Unfortunately, no. I'm still not on the HDTV rail.
>
> ProjectX TS4 seems neither the files nor the gemuxten to like it.
Even. The tool is only for mpeg2 jurisdiction.
>
> Is there any chance to be in accordance Xvid
> Convert it to scale technically einzudampfen?
Xvid is not smaller than H.264 files with the same quality.
The latter is currently the best thing there is. Smaller files will be
only through a lossy Recodierung of Picture and / or sound.
wb mfg
Antwort von Dennis Reinhardt:
Wolfgang Barth wrote:
>> Is there any chance to be in accordance Xvid
>> Convert it to scale technically einzudampfen?
> Xvid makes no smaller than H.264 files with the same quality.
> The latter is currently the best thing there is. Smaller files will be
> Only by a lossy Recodierung of Picture and / or sound.
>
> Wb mfg
Yes, I would stop with ~ 3 megabit try. The quality of play
not as the major role. I just want a friend in overseas
Recording a TV give it otherwise about NEN
highly dubious Torrent should provide. :)
Gruß, Dennis
Antwort von Wolfgang Barth:
Dennis Reinhardt wrote:
> Wolfgang Barth wrote:
>
>>> Is there any chance to be in accordance Xvid
>>> Convert it to scale technically einzudampfen?
>
> Yes, I would stop with ~ 3 megabit try. The quality of play
> Not the major role.
Recoding I use the "super" of eRightSoft. This can at least
up to 1280 * 720, because it is in its parameter list.
The experimental times. And it is precisely in recoding Resolutionmit Xvid SDTV or
H.264 or what always synonymous. Then it will be massively smaller. If there are
the USA with 480 lines is very small and very "mushy".
wb mfg
Antwort von Wolfgang Hauser:
Dennis Reinhardt wrote:
> a friend overseas
> Recording a TV give
Ever thought of the media channel consulted? I would like to
Only do work when not to be happy on this path s.das
Material.
The quality is also available now partly quite
surprisingly good.
News Example: "People at Maischberger of 7.4. at
ardmediathek.de available as WMV with almost 3 Mbit / s in a little more than
900x500 pixels. This is above the level of DVD recorders!
Antwort von Dennis Reinhardt:
Wolfgang Hauser wrote:
> Ever thought of the media channel consulted? I would like to
> Only work, if not happy to be on this path s.das
> Material.
It's about "Doctor Who" on BBC HD s.kommenden Saturday. Although the
BBC probably something similar online where you can sometimes some consequences
can view it, but do an IP check. And I find no
fast and usable proxies in the UK.
> The quality is also available now partly quite
> Surprisingly well.
> News Example: "People at Maischberger of 7.4. at
> Ardmediathek.de available as WMV with almost 3 Mbit / s in a little more than
> 900x500 pixels. This is above the level of DVD recorders!
Okay, but people in Maischberger now, I would not necessarily
owllen record:)
Antwort von Helmut Hullen:
Hello Wolfgang,
You s.04.04.09 my test:
>> If I have several *. mpg files (split due to file size) with
>> PVAstrumento one and the other summarizing the results
>> As one *. mpv and *. mpa file and then will output the *. mpv and
>> *. Mpa file with mplex1 return to a single *. mpg file
>> Summarize the information loss associated with?
> No loss regarding video - and audio quality.
[...]
> However, do you quite cumbersome.
> With ProjectX is a step including the rough cut.
> (Output m2p then rename in mpg.)
Now I have some procedures durchprobiert.
Windows:
PVAstrumento
Cuttermaran
muxen
PVAstrumento
MPEG2Schnitt
muxen
Linux:
ProjectX
Windows: Cuttermaran requires. NET and Windows XP - both are not
necessarily on each machine before.
Muxen: the "mplex.dll" is older than "mplex1" and seems to be s.and
hook, then I must with "mplex1 'work.
Linux: looks as if ProjectX is similarly powerful, but
much faster. Can (in the "Customize" menu) synonymous muxen.
PVAstrumento some files can already be usable to prepare,
particularly the advertising blocks (frequent) value. Facilitates
(rest) very cutting.
Is there something synonymous with Linux?
Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
Antwort von Wolfgang Barth:
Helmut Hulle wrote:
>
> Windows:
>
> PVAstrumento
> Cuttermaran
> Muxen
>
> PVAstrumento
> MPEG2Schnitt
> Muxen
or just ProjectX. It just needs Java installed.
How do I do it now for many years.
>
> Linux:
>
> ProjectX
>
> Linux: looks as if ProjectX is similarly powerful, but
> Much faster. Can (in the "Customize" menu) synonymous muxen.
That would be me. In 0.90.04 B25 is not yet there.
You can just mplex1 as "post" mount.
But if you "gemuxtes" source material has, and is coarsely cut
ProjectX to convert with just one run in and extremely fast.
wb mfg
Antwort von Helmut Hullen:
Hello Wolfgang,
You s.10.04.09 my test:
>> ProjectX
>>
>> Linux: looks as if ProjectX is similarly powerful,
>> But a lot faster. Can (in the "Customize" menu) synonymous muxen.
> That would be me. In 0.90.04 B25 is not yet there.
> You can just mplex1 as "post" mount.
Here (Linux): ProjectX 0.90.4.00/30.3.2006
Process "Customize" action "to M2P"
No specific entry in "Settings / post"
Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
Antwort von Wolfgang Barth:
Helmut Hulle wrote:
>
>> That would be me. In 0.90.04 B25 is not yet there.
>> You can just mplex1 as "post" mount.
>
> Here (Linux): ProjectX 0.90.4.00/30.3.2006
>
> Process "Customize" action "to M2P"
> No specific entry in "Settings / post"
Yes, that's the setting I use for years.
But this can be just one from a file (consequently) the existing, ie
not "demuxten", video / audio stream back into such a transform,
So the "demux" quasi prevent.
I do not know how to use this setting with an already-in video
and audio (two files) separate video and audio stream with this
Setting back into a file together, then "muxen" may.
wb mfg
