Frage von Peter06:![](https://www.slashcam.de/images/basic/google_trans_headline.gif)
What is the export of shooting AP in the difference between "join video" and "no fields (progressive)" in the rendering options? Source material is interlaced (50i).
Antwort von pyjama:
![](https://www.slashcam.de/images/basic/google_trans_headline.gif)
If you are on the PC monitor video want to play, you can not half need it. When rendering so you have the option "join video" option.
Antwort von pyjama:
![](https://www.slashcam.de/images/basic/google_trans_headline.gif)
But if he selects the item progressive, but he has already achieved ... So why then added "join" - which he says sure, I think? :)
Antwort von Wiro:
But if he selects the item progressive, but he has already achieved ... No..
The pull-down menu "Progressive / Lower / Upper", the rendering engine only indicates how the scan lines to be processed - it does not say, from interlaced> progressive. "Progressive" is only set if the original footage in the timeline is already present progressive (with material about 25p).
"Merging" on the other hand, the rendering engine, it only every 2nd Line (ie a field) into account and the intervening interpolated them. This is something completely different.
Gruss Wiro
Antwort von Beatfabrikant:
![](https://www.slashcam.de/images/basic/google_trans_headline.gif)
I have since grad could ask the question on the subject.
If I interlaced video on my PC play, you can clearly recognize the half. On the other hand, television can be seen they are not. So far so clear. How is the video footage now changed, if it is in format such as WMV or Divx compressed. Finally, one in shooting Dvix yes to monitor and not on the television fields.
Antwort von Wiro:
![](https://www.slashcam.de/images/basic/google_trans_headline.gif)
With MPEG4 derivatives like DivX or WMV synonymous, it is no different.
Interlaced material is as synonymous with rows offset (Halbbildkämmen) displayed - so it is synonymous because when encoding "Material join" setting (called at different encoders often synonymous otherwise).
Some players are MPEG4 Halbbildmaterial autom. deinterlaced, since they simply omit a half. For other players it can be set manually during playback. But these are all just crutches.
The only true way is, when encoding is already the material together. It is - as described - only every 2nd Line and the rest interpolated.
Gruss Wiro
Antwort von wolfgang:
.... and no fields (progressive) "in the rendering options? Source material is interlaced (50i). Here was but rather the question of rendering options. And sowas:
No..
The pull-down menu "Progressive / Lower / Upper", the rendering engine only indicates how the scan lines to be processed - it does not say, from interlaced> progressive. "Progressive" is only set if the original footage in the timeline is already present progressive (with material about 25p).
I would rather the project settings in the NLE expected because it is based on the settings for the source material relates. Well apparently this is not so.