Frage von mrhellstein:
Hi,
is it true that the number of MV8xx Canon has an aperture of f1.6? like this from the mini-chip 1 / 6?
have 3x1 / 6 "CCD camcorders with f1.8 same low-light properties as a 1 / 6" CCD with f1.6?
thank you,
Bye ;-)
Antwort von Acer:
Hello,
yes, it is true that the Canon MV8xx (at least my MV850i) Series has an aperture of f1.6. Whether three CCD camcorder with the same aperture 1.8 Low-light-show properties, I can not answer.
Antwort von mrhellstein:
Many thanks erstnma !!!;-"
But as it stands with the camcorder 3ccd-and the properties of low-light?
Antwort von Markus:
But as it stands with the camcorder 3ccd-and the properties of low-light? Is not the very general question? In principle applies: The larger the image intensifier are and the less (!) Pixels on it, the better the intensity of the camcorder. - Is that what you asked for?
Related Topic I:
1x1/6", 3x1/6"Verwandtes Thema II:
Explicitly stated in the question that you have ;-)
Antwort von Jan:
A Lichstarke Optics is all right, but since the JVC GR DV 2000 / 3000 and 4000 with its 1.2 lens, he has shown us the light intensity makes up only a part, were the 3 models in each year LowLight its competitor Sony Panasonic + ( 1.6 and 1.8) failed.
The quality of large CCD sensor, really good tempered lenses and a good signal processor is just as important. Models of higher category, ala Canon XL H 1 / L 2 (with 20x) and XM 2 have only synonymous f 1.6.
Since the digital age has been changes. The small sensors in entry-level (1 / 6 ") so would be about a half inch - not necessarily synonymous need a huge hole - the collecting lens and the light scattering answer" "
must be well paid - to the light as evenly as possible to raise the sensor - cheap lenses scatter light, and there are reflections and the picture becomes soft, low contrast, sharpness is not up to the edge profile.
The signal processor is responsible, among other things, for color management, he has influence image noise synonymous's - and that's an important point in low light.
Today, many factors play purely to convince there is synonymous with many cameras, the CCD pixels and similar small area anyway because the other factors to achieve a perfect combination - eg. DigiSLR Camera "Superior" of the year in Europe, Nikon D 200th
LG
Jan
Antwort von Acer:
I think our "guest" wants to know what is more important in the Videoaufnhamen in the same (bad) recording situations.
1. An f1.6 aperture and only 1x1 / 6 "CCD
or
2. An f1.8 aperture and for 3x1 / 6 "CCD.
So he wants to know who makes the better Cam shots in the same (bad) lighting conditions and whether the primacy of the 3CCD compensates the comminution aperture.
That's how I understood it.
Philipp
Antwort von Jan:
One can not say so, I had written, the JVC GR DV 2/3/4000, despite its 1.2 Lichstärke has not necessarily convinced by lowlight - similar SonyPC Series 1.6 or 1.8, despite the better picture for worse light.
If it is the same company, same CCD technology / size, same lens, same processor then the 3-chip model will vorneliegen with f close to 1.8, but only just. So big the difference is not between 1.6 and 1.8.
LG
Jan
Antwort von Acer:
Then I calmed find that my desire NV-GS280 has better low-light properties, as my current Canon MV850i Of ... phew, right?
