Frage von dradz@web.de:
Hello together!
I'm new in this forum and hope I'm right here synonymous
landed with my question that would be because ... "I plan soon
my own HP to make at the time I like a larger number of
Videos for download, or even better, available for streaming
would like. In doing so it is relatively high-quality
Videos act, with a length of approximately 15-30 minutes. Now
Unfortunately, I have little idea how best to me that in a good
Speed, without too much loading can achieve.
So the questions:
1. What format would be da best ever? Rather, Avi, or
Mpg, or a completely different format?
2. Which vendor is recommended that a fast server
Available so that you do not have to wait for death, until
anything happens, I would be synonymous to a certain sum
this issue. Above all, the video archive is always next
grow, so synonymous sufficient space available
should be.
3. Is that even feasible for private HPs, a fast,
high-quality video stream to provide? Mostly
yes you can see only about 30 sec. Mini videos in meager
Quality ...
Yes, provided only once for an introduction. I hope there is
anyone experienced in this field, and me as a
bit of help could and can tell me what else
still important to observe, so before you start a project, etc.
Thanks again in advance:).
Antwort von dradz@web.de:
Hi, first of all thank you for the answer, help me in any
Very next case, but I would still have a few additional
Questions ...
> Well, it depends mainly on whether you are streaming or only synonymous
> Download. When downloading, it is actually more or less
> Wurscht, because all you need is to ensure that as many
> User with as little effort "abspielfähig" are.
> For Streaming's imperative, however, you must use a format which
> This is appropriate. AVI is no such format in the MPEG Ausprägu =
ng
> As a "transport stream" on the other hand already.
OK, so MPG. Is this the only format, which you for streams
synonymous and can recommend the quickest, or there are other
Möglichekeiten?
> This is good. Practically everyone has Hoster for the targeted
> Appropriate services (dedicated server with generous
> Traffic-fee or flat), this offers merely a cost of course
> Considerably more than a simple website of a few MB, which together
> With hundreds of others on a single server.
> So easy to get between HP's free and very few in ¤
> Year after being missed, for a dedicated server must be flat with
> The other hand, at least as about 1000 ¤ / year abdrücken.
>
> If the circle of users of the service is limited and relatively small
> Is sufficient, perhaps synonymous a virtual server. Den there's already
> Much less money, but a (small) three-digit number ¤ per year
> You have to give this estimate synonymous.
Mhm, so I had around me the synonymous presented, then it would probably
rather a virtual server synonymous do I think. Since one here yes
probably should not post supplier, which are recommended,
I will even at times because the search must I think.
Or someone can give me maybe a good starting point for a friend?
>> 3 Is that even feasible for private HPs, a fast,
>> High-quality video stream to provide?
Is there perhaps someone who is on his own HP
Video Stream offers, and of his experiences could
watch what should be, if you would like to start a tender and
what you should do and what you should prefer to avoid, etc.
Each notice will in any case very much appreciated ... :)!
