Frage von biene170:
hello, I would like to see soon a camcorder to buy, just know I'm in some really not, so this time I want to ask. I hope you can help me!
1. what is the difference between a digital image stabilizer and an optical image stabilizer?
2. The megapixel or pixel in the film important? because most have only 800,000 pixels?
3. jvc camcorder what can you recommend me?
In any case there should be a disk with his!
danke für eure hilfe
Antwort von AndyZZ:
1. what is the difference between a digital image stabilizer and an optical image stabilizer?
A Digital Image Stabilization uses the surface of the CCDs to the picture on the chip, so to speak, "out-and herzuschieben".
For an optical stabilizer is usually a movable lens in front of the chip / chip, the picture counter-movement by stabilized.
2. The megapixel or pixel in the film important? because most have only 800,000 pixels?
For the shoot you need 720x576 pixel = 414,720 pixels.
The remaining pixels are either on the electronic Image Stabilization is necessary or for the built-in photo function (which you usually can forget eh!)
3. jvc camcorder what can you recommend me?
Sorry, I know with JVC Cams is not enough.
In any case there should be a disk with his!
Would you like s.PC edit? Then should you have a miniDV tape cam with take. Would you just hold it and then watch, then do it a DVD or HDD Cam too.
Antwort von Jan:
3. Look at the two of them at times, wenns ne JVC to be:
MG MG 505 vs.
575 VG
Jan
Antwort von Genevare:
As long as you do not at least 1,500 euros to spend it, so is the preference scheißno what you buy ... Take some what from the beginner league, this is rich.
Antwort von Biene170:
hy thanks for your reply.
So it wants to halt s.computer edit synonymous.
I've prescribed me yesterday, I wanted not only a jvc camcorder Recommandation but a general recommendation.
what is now actually better? an optical image stabilizer or a digital? 've read here in the forum is a better optical to be.
and I would be honest if you have a normal image instead verwackelungen have.
in some stands while Super SteadyShot, that is if I read correctly synonymous have a picture stabilizer, just how do I know I have an optical or digital is?
synonymous nor what I wanted to ask for some it is handycam, which means that?
it is clearly too many gitb camcorder in the world, I can not even decide for a brand!
mfg
Antwort von Bernd E.:
So it wants to halt s.computer edit synonymous. Then, a MiniDV camcorder is the best choice.
what is now actually better? an optical image stabilizer or a digital? 've read here in the forum is a better optical to be. True, if it is synonymous, at least of Sony electronic Today there are also a reasonably good job.
and I want ... instead of a normal visual verwackelungen have. The best way is still a Tripod. Insertion, whenever it is!
in some stands while Super SteadyShot, that is if I read correctly synonymous have a picture stabilizer, just how do I know I have an optical or digital is? That is the term for an electronic image Stabilization of Sony.
in some stands while handycam, which means that? This is also a description of Sony, but means nothing as the next, that the device is a camcorder (for the distinction as of the cameras, the Sony 'Cybershot' hot).
it is clearly too many gitb camcorder in the world, I can not even decide for a brand! This problem has been present in almost every product, from the washing ... ;-)
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von Biene170:
Thank you for the quick reply!
Well now is s.mir, now I have only dreamed about my camcorder to my affordable price range view and compare!
mfg
Antwort von Jürgen Hochmuth:
test
Antwort von Jürgen Hochmuth:
Hello, I have just synonymous the problem of choice. So far, I have a Canon with MV20i (Mini DV) filmed. And was very satisfied so far.
I believe that video cameras without optical stabilizer worse.
If you want to edit movies s.PC (and it should probably always be, because what you want with uncut shooting?) Is any system.
The quality is definitely with Mini DV s.besten. When such films on DVD burning, you already have a quality loss.
Mini DV usually uses the AVI format. Since an hour is about 12 gigabytes of movie recorded. The DVD has about 4.5 Giga place but for 2 hours of film. The resultant eineQualitätsverschlechterung arises is obvious.
If I can help, please email s.shopper @ online.de
Incidentally, to me, I will probably be a Panasonic NV GS 320 EC to buy, because they usopt Camera. Stabislisator / Mini DV has. Am I on the Internet for 499 euros found.
(The Canon MV 20I in 2000, about 2900DM (!) Tasted and is now broken after 50 shooting, the repair would cost around 250 euros!)
Antwort von Peter06:
test 1, 2, 3 .. - Yes, go
;)
Antwort von biene170:
yes but I have so far not seen the camcorder has a hard drive and mini dv has? because almost all camcorder hard disk recording in MPEG2!
MPEG2 is so bad quality and bad editing?
mfg
Antwort von Markus73:
yes but I have so far not seen the camcorder has a hard drive and mini dv has? because almost all camcorder hard disk recording in MPEG2! Since you have misunderstood something: is MiniDV tape, always! This is DV-AVI format. Hard disks and DVD camcorders into MPEG2 draw on.
MPEG2 is so bad quality and bad editing? It is actually not a great handling foreseen. Reiner cut alone is not a major problem. It's difficult when effects are used to modify the image material. MPEG2 is compressed across one frame, so you should s.diesem material is no longer feasible change.
Basically MPEG2 is not bad, on any video DVD, this format. The problem is only when precompressed material again changed.
For MiniDV is the way someone else: It uses material that is only very slightly compressed, thus all processing steps and then to compress MPEG2 file. All changes can be considered in the compression and these should be optimized. Once compressed, the thus generated MPEG2 file no longer changed.
Therefore, the basic recommendation: If you want post and is only mini-DV and nothing else.
Gruß,
Markus
Antwort von Markus73:
If you want to edit movies s.PC (and it should probably always be, because what you want with uncut shooting?) Is any system. ... with more or less annoying / serious limitations, problems and quality deficiencies, if one MPEG2-based recording formats use!
When such films on DVD burning, you already have a quality loss. In theory, yes. Watch this loss can be handy but not good when compressed.
Very crucial is when this compression takes place (before or after processing), see my other post.
Otherwise full support!
Gruß,
Markus
